This is more an academic question right now but was there ever some
work in progress how UML could be made better for Python or script
languages in general.
It is so extremely deep interwoven with Java/C++ language
implementations that there are a lot of modified notiations necessary.
Or is
On 5 Apr., 15:48, Fredrik Lundh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
llothar wrote:
My question was: Why does setup.py generated sometimes a pyd and
sometimes a so file?
setup.py picks an extension that happens to work on the platform you're
running setup.py on. doing otherwise would be pretty
Right, so you think people aren't trying to help you?
I think they are not reading the question.
You display your ignorance here. The .pyd extension is used on Windows
as an alternative to .dll, but both are recognized as shared
libraries. Personally I'm not really sure why they even chose
On windows everything is '.pyd' but there seems to be two ways to get
this on unix?
Why and what is the rule?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Thanks, my question was not how can i make python to it find. I don't
have a problem.
My question was: Why does setup.py generated sometimes a pyd and
sometimes a so file?
There must be a rule behind this.
Unforunately setup.py is not well documented. Here i mean i need a
specification not a
I works well on Linux. But on FreeBSD when i use
../bin/python setup.py build_ext --inplace
to select my own build python interpreter it is not using the correct
library paths and therefore complains that it can't find the -
lpython2.5 library.
Using python-config i also don't see that the lib
Why does Python2.5 do not include the amalgamation source code of
sqlite3?
At the moment it is not possible to build the system out of the box
with the Visual Studio project.
I don't think this is good. The amalgamation version is exactly for
this purpose.
Is there a 2.5.3 release on the way?
--
I'm, not sure that I'm getting your point, but are you trying to argue that
_not_ knowing mathemathics makes you a better programmer?
No but it doesn't help you very much either. They are just different
skills.
Or maybe that learning math is useless to a programmer?
No and at least the
On 21 Okt., 21:39, Arne Vajhøj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That level of activity could be considered dead.
For me at least 2% of the total line count should be changed
to call it non dead.
I don't say it it not used anymore for users it might be
not dead but this is not the point under
Depends obvious a bot on what you consider serious math.
Expression evaluation, floating point characteristics, relational
database theory, simulation, optimum location, encryption etc.
are all based on mathematics of different levels.
Thats not i call serious maths. You just need a very
I love math. I respect Math. I'm nothing but a menial servant to
Mathematics.
Programming and use cases are not maths. Many mathematics are
the worst programmers i've seen because they want to solve things and
much more often you just need heuristics. Once they are into exact
world they loose
On 5 Sep., 02:15, Kenneth McDonald [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Would anyone care to offer their opinions as to using Python with the
FOX GUI toolkit? Ease of use, stability, power,
speed, etc., all thoughts would be appreciated.
Pure theoretical question, as FXPy is not supported anymore, but i
I'm afraid that the GIL is killing the usefullness of python for some
types of applications now where 4,8 oder 64 threads on a chip are here
or comming soon.
What is the status about that for the future of python?
I know that at the moment allmost nobody in the scripting world has
solved this
On 3 Sep., 07:38, Eduardo O. Padoan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
No.http://www.artima.com/weblogs/viewpost.jsp?thread=211430
Ops, I meant:http://www.artima.com/forums/threaded.jsp?forum=106thread=211200
Thanks. I whish there would be a project for rewritting the C
interpreter
to make it better
On 1 Sep., 10:37, Lawrence D'Oliveiro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
central.gen.new_zealand wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], llothar
wrote:
How can i find out if a selected python interpreter (i only know the
path name under which i should start it) is a debug build?
What's the difference
On 1 Sep., 13:25, Martin v. Löwis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you want it cross-platform, you can check whether sys.getobjects
is available. That, of course, is also unsafe because there isn't
a single debug build on Unix, but instead, several debugging
features can be enabled and disabled
On 29 Aug., 13:45, Russ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have not yet personally used it, but I am interested in anything
that can help to make my programs more reliable. If you are
programming something that doesn't really need to be correct, than you
probably don't need it. But if you really need
Would you like to contribute a patch?
Would such a patch require a full blown PEP?
If i have to write a PEP i can better add it to the documentation of
my application and be sure that the problem is solved. A patch might
be rejected by anybody in a bad mood or who don't understand why it is
How can i find out if a selected python interpreter (i only know the
path name under which i should start it) is a debug build? I tried
sys.api_version, sys.platform, sys.version, sys.version_info
and there is no difference between python.exe and python_d.exe.
I'm pretty sure the information
Hello,
as the subject says, for an embedded application i need a 100% pure
python webserver that can talk to a FCGI process (which runs ruby on
rails). Of couse it also must be able to use simple CGI.
Please don't ask why i want a python webserver for a ruby application.
I just need it.
--
Here i jump into this thread.
With this option the configure script runs well.
But then i get a compile error in complexobject.
I'm using Solaris in 32-Bit Mode on my AthlonX2.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Hello,
i must add my own python.exe and a little patched runtime library with
my product.
How can i setup the python path, so that the directories are not taken
from the registry values for Python2.4 but something relative to my own
python.exe ?
With PYTHONPATH i can only add new items in front
Hello,
i'm looking for a simple http proxy in python.
Does anybody know about something like this ?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
23 matches
Mail list logo
