Re: Anonymous email users

On Sat, 15 Jun 2024 at 08:32, dn via Python-list wrote: > These mailing-lists all run under the Python Code of Conduct. > The newsgroup, however, is not. Which means that anyone who posts on the newsgroup is subject to no such restrictions - and that might explain the, shall we say, quite

Re: Anonymous email users

On 15/06/24 10:00, AVI GROSS via Python-list wrote: I notice that in some recent discussions, we have users who cannot be replied to directly as their email addresses are not valid ones, and I believe on purpose. Examples in the thread I was going to reply to are: ... It's an interesting

Anonymous email users

I notice that in some recent discussions, we have users who cannot be replied to directly as their email addresses are not valid ones, and I believe on purpose. Examples in the thread I was going to reply to are: henha...@devnull.tb

Re: in Python: (101 102 103 201 202 203 301 302 303 401 402 403 )

Phil Carmody wrote at 12:01 this Thursday (GMT): > Paul Rubin writes: >> HenHanna writes: >>> is there another (simple) way to write this? >> >> Yes, but please consider doing these easy exercises yourself instead of >> fobbing them onto other people. > > Hen's probably just an experimental

Re: Suggested python feature: allowing except in context maneger

Cameron, I'm not really sure I got your point. I've used the "file not found" exception as an example for a behavior typical on context managers. This could be a failure to connect to DB, or threads. It also applies to any kind of possible exception, whether cased by the context manager itself or

Re: Suggested python feature: allowing except in context maneger

On 13Jun2024 19:44, dieter.mau...@online.de wrote: Why not use: ``` try: with open()... ... except FileNotFoundError: ... ``` This is exactly what the OP was expressing dissatisfaction with. I'm -1 on the idea myself - not every combination of things needs additional syntactic support,

Suggested python feature: allowing except in context maneger

Yair Eshel wrote at 2024-6-13 13:01 +0300: > ... >I would like to suggest an alternative syntax, that will, in a sense, apply >the best of both worlds: > >import logging >with open('sample_data/README.md') as f: > print (len(f.read())) >except FileNotFoundError: > logging.error("File not") Are

Re: Couldn't install numpy on Python 2.7

Hey, everyone! I believe the original question has been answered, and tempers seem to be flaring in sub-threads, so let's call this thread done and move on to other interesting topics. Thank you for your support! -- ~Ethan~ Moderator -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: Suggested python feature: allowing except in context maneger

> On 13 Jun 2024, at 11:01, Yair Eshel via Python-list > wrote: > > I read this is a good place to give some suggestions for features in > python. Best place these days is to raise an idea on https://discuss.python.org/ Beware that this idea has come up in the past and was rejected. Barry

Re: in Python: (101 102 103 201 202 203 301 302 303 401 402 403 )

Paul Rubin writes: > HenHanna writes: >> is there another (simple) way to write this? > > Yes, but please consider doing these easy exercises yourself instead of > fobbing them onto other people. Hen's probably just an experimental GPT. You, with your limited resources, can never train it. I'd

Re: Couldn't install numpy on Python 2.7

Chris Angelico wrote: > On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 at 10:58, wrote: > > > > Chris, > > > > You seem to have perceived an insult that I remain unaware of. > > If you're not aware that you're saying this, then don't say it. > Er, um, that really makes no sense! :-) How can one not say something that

Suggested python feature: allowing except in context maneger

Hello. I read this is a good place to give some suggestions for features in python. If not, please let me know. This is an example of a code I normally use in my everyday work: import logging try: with open('sample_data/READM.md') as f: print (len(f.read())) except FileNotFoundError:

Re: Couldn't install numpy on Python 2.7

On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 at 10:58, wrote: > > Chris, > > You seem to have perceived an insult that I remain unaware of. If you're not aware that you're saying this, then don't say it. > I looked up FUD and sharply disagree with suggestions I am trying to somehow > cause Fear, Uncertainty or Doubt. I

RE: Couldn't install numpy on Python 2.7

Chris, You seem to have perceived an insult that I remain unaware of. I have no special knowledge, like you do, of plans made for changes to the pthon language and implementation. I was asking a hypothetical question about what some users would do if python came out with a newer major version.

Re: Couldn't install numpy on Python 2.7

On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 at 09:20, wrote: > My point was that version 4 COULD HAPPEN one day and I meant INCOMPATIBLE > version not 4. Obviously we can make a version 4 that is not incompatible > too. This is still FUD. Back your words with something, or stop trying to imply that there's another

RE: Couldn't install numpy on Python 2.7

Chris, I don't want to get off message and debate whether my "jokes" are jokes, let alone funny. Obviously, they often aren't. What I meant by joking here does seem relevant. As the years pass, there can come a time when it is suggested that a language (any language including python) is no

Re: Couldn't install numpy on Python 2.7

On Wed, 12 Jun 2024 at 23:52, Greg Ewing via Python-list wrote: > On 13/06/24 10:09 am, Chris Angelico wrote: > > So if anyone > > actually does need to use pip with Python 2.7, they probably need to > > set up a local server > > You should also be able to download a .tar.gz from PyPI and use

Re: Couldn't install numpy on Python 2.7

On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 at 08:46, Oscar Benjamin via Python-list wrote: > I don't know much about SSL and related networking things especially > on Windows. I would be surprised if pip on old Python can't install > from current PyPI though. I imagine that something strange has > happened like a new

Re: Couldn't install numpy on Python 2.7

On 13/06/24 4:31 am, avi.e.gr...@gmail.com wrote: It seems Microsoft is having a problem where something lik 2/3 of Windows users have not upgraded from Windows 10 after many years At least Python 3 is a clear improvement over Python 2 in many ways. Whereas the only thing Microsoft seems to

Re: Couldn't install numpy on Python 2.7

On Wed, 12 Jun 2024 at 23:11, Chris Angelico via Python-list wrote: > > On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 at 07:57, Oscar Benjamin via Python-list > wrote: > > They are seeing a warning that explicitly says "You can upgrade to a > > newer version of Python to solve this". I don't know whether that SSL > >

Re: Couldn't install numpy on Python 2.7

On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 at 07:57, Oscar Benjamin via Python-list wrote: > They are seeing a warning that explicitly says "You can upgrade to a > newer version of Python to solve this". I don't know whether that SSL > warning is directly connected to pip not finding any versions of numpy > but with

Re: Couldn't install numpy on Python 2.7

On Wed, 12 Jun 2024 at 22:38, AVI GROSS via Python-list wrote: > > The discussion though was about a specific OP asking if they can fix their > problem. One solution being suggested is to fix a deeper problem and simply > make their code work with a recent version of python 3. The OP has not

Re: Couldn't install numpy on Python 2.7

On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 at 07:36, wrote: > But if the goal was to deprecate python 2 and in some sense phase it out, it > is perhaps not working well for some. Frankly, issuing so many updates like > 2.7 and including backporting of new features has helped make it possible to > delay any upgrade.

RE: Couldn't install numpy on Python 2.7

Chris, Since you misunderstood, my statement was that making an incompatible set of changes to create Python 3 in the first place was a decision made by some and perhaps not one that thrilled others who already had an embedded base of programs or ones in the pipeline that would need much work to

Re: Couldn't install numpy on Python 2.7

On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 at 06:55, Thomas Passin via Python-list wrote: > The project cannot move to a Python-3 compatible version because Jython > 3.xx doesn't exist and may never exist. The saving grace is that my > project doesn't have to use packages like numpy, scipy, and so forth. Exactly. If

Re: Couldn't install numpy on Python 2.7

On 6/12/2024 1:59 PM, Chris Angelico via Python-list wrote: On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 at 03:41, AVI GROSS via Python-list wrote: Change is hard even when it may be necessary. The argument often is about whether some things are necessary or not. Python made a decision but clearly not a unanimous

Re: Couldn't install numpy on Python 2.7

On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 at 03:41, AVI GROSS via Python-list wrote: > > Change is hard even when it may be necessary. > > The argument often is about whether some things are necessary or not. > > Python made a decision but clearly not a unanimous one. What decision? To not release any new versions of

RE: Couldn't install numpy on Python 2.7

Change is hard even when it may be necessary. The argument often is about whether some things are necessary or not. Python made a decision but clearly not a unanimous one. My current PC was not upgradable because of the new hardware requirement Microsoft decided was needed for Windows 11. I

Re: Couldn't install numpy on Python 2.7

On 2024-06-12 17:31, AVI GROSS via Python-list wrote: I am sure there is inertia to move from an older product and some people need a reason like this where the old becomes untenable. It seems Microsoft is having a problem where something lik 2/3 of Windows users have not upgraded from Windows

RE: Couldn't install numpy on Python 2.7

I am sure there is inertia to move from an older product and some people need a reason like this where the old becomes untenable. It seems Microsoft is having a problem where something lik 2/3 of Windows users have not upgraded from Windows 10 after many years and have set a deadline in a year or

Re: Couldn't install numpy on Python 2.7

On 12/06/2024 12:30, marc nicole wrote: I am trying to install numpy library on Python 2.7.15 in PyCharm but the error message I get is: ERROR: Could not find a version that satisfies the requirement numpy (from versions: none) ERROR: No matching distribution found for numpy

Re: Couldn't install numpy on Python 2.7

On Wed, 12 Jun 2024 at 21:32, marc nicole via Python-list wrote: > > I am trying to install numpy library on Python 2.7.15 in PyCharm but the > error message I get is: > > You can upgrade to a newer version of Python to solve this. The answer is right there in the error message. ChrisA --

Couldn't install numpy on Python 2.7

I am trying to install numpy library on Python 2.7.15 in PyCharm but the error message I get is: ERROR: Could not find a version that satisfies the requirement numpy (from > versions: none) > ERROR: No matching distribution found for numpy >

Re: in Python? -- Chunk -- (ChunkC '(a a b b b)), ==> ((a 2) (b 3))

On 6/10/2024 6:29 AM, Rob Cliffe wrote: import itertools def chunk1(seq):     return [ ch * len(list(grp)) for (ch, grp) in itertools.groupby(s) ] def chunk2(seq):     return [ (ch, len(list(grp))) for (ch, grp) in itertools.groupby(s) ] s='aaabbaa' print(chunk1(s)) print(chunk2(s))

RE: in Python? -- Chunk -- (ChunkC '(a a b b b)), ==> ((a 2) (b 3))

Rob, That is a fairly straightforward and elegant solution if using an added mode called itertools. I went a different way by creating my own focused iterator and calling it, when needed, to produce one or the other of the results requested in the functions named chunk() and chunkc(). But

Re: in Python? -- Chunk -- (ChunkC '(a a b b b)), ==> ((a 2) (b 3))

import itertools def chunk1(seq):     return [ ch * len(list(grp)) for (ch, grp) in itertools.groupby(s) ] def chunk2(seq):     return [ (ch, len(list(grp))) for (ch, grp) in itertools.groupby(s) ] s='aaabbaa' print(chunk1(s)) print(chunk2(s)) ### Program

RE: in Python? -- Chunk -- (ChunkC '(a a b b b)), ==> ((a 2) (b 3))

> i was just curiuos about simple, clever way to write it in Python It depends on what you mean by "clever". For some, it was like a suggestion on using something already available such as itertools.groupby, perhaps even better if it is actually compiled in from a language like C and perhaps

Re: IDLE: clearing the screen

On 08/06/2024 14.18, Rob Cliffe wrote: OK, here is the advanced version: import os class _cls(object):     def __repr__(self):         os.system('cls')         return '' cls = _cls() Now when you type cls it clears the screen.  The only flaw is that there is a blank line at the very top of

Re: IDLE: clearing the screen

On 10/06/2024 09.32, Stefan Ram wrote: "Michael F. Stemper" wrote or quoted: On 08/06/2024 14.18, Rob Cliffe wrote: OK, here is the advanced version: import os class _cls(object):     def __repr__(self):         os.system('cls')         return '' cls = _cls() ... Why have it return

Re: in Python? -- Chunk -- (ChunkC '(a a b b b)), ==> ((a 2) (b 3))

On 6/9/2024 7:05 PM, avi.e.gr...@gmail.com wrote: I remembered that HenHanna had been hard to deal with in the past and when my reply to him/her/them bounced as a bad/fake address it came back to me that I am better off not participating in this latest attempt to get us to perform then probably

Re: in Python? -- Chunk -- (ChunkC '(a a b b b)), ==> ((a 2) (b 3))

On 6/9/2024 3:50 PM, MRAB wrote: On 2024-06-09 22:20, HenHanna via Python-list wrote: Chunk, ChunkC -- nice simple way(s) to write these in Python? (Chunk  '(a a   b    a a a   b b))   ==> ((a a) (b)  (a a a) (b b)) (Chunk  '(a a a a   b   c c   a a   d   e e e e))   ==> ((a a a a)

RE: in Python? -- Chunk -- (ChunkC '(a a b b b)), ==> ((a 2) (b 3))

I remembered that HenHanna had been hard to deal with in the past and when my reply to him/her/them bounced as a bad/fake address it came back to me that I am better off not participating in this latest attempt to get us to perform then probably shoot whatever we say down. A considerate person

RE: in Python? -- Chunk -- (ChunkC '(a a b b b)), ==> ((a 2) (b 3))

HH, Before bothering, it might be helpful if you spelled out a bit more in the way of requirements that would satisfy you and perhaps show your attempts. Your examples suggest it would be fairly simple to create an iterator, for example, that would yield as it examined one item at a time until

Re: in Python? -- Chunk -- (ChunkC '(a a b b b)), ==> ((a 2) (b 3))

On 2024-06-09 22:20, HenHanna via Python-list wrote: Chunk, ChunkC -- nice simple way(s) to write these in Python? (Chunk '(a a ba a a b b)) ==> ((a a) (b) (a a a) (b b)) (Chunk '(a a a a b c c a a d e e e e)) ==> ((a a a a) (b) (c c) (a a) (d) (e e e e))

in Python? -- Chunk -- (ChunkC '(a a b b b)), ==> ((a 2) (b 3))

Chunk, ChunkC -- nice simple way(s) to write these in Python? (Chunk '(a a ba a a b b)) ==> ((a a) (b) (a a a) (b b)) (Chunk '(a a a a b c c a a d e e e e)) ==> ((a a a a) (b) (c c) (a a) (d) (e e e e)) (Chunk '(2 2 foo bar bar j j j k baz baz))

Re: IDLE: clearing the screen

On 08/06/2024 20:18, Rob Cliffe via Python-list wrote: > OK, here is the advanced version: > import os > class _cls(object): >     def __repr__(self): >         os.system('cls') >         return '' > cls = _cls() > > Now when you type > cls > it clears the screen.  For me on a Mac it clears

Re: From JoyceUlysses.txt -- words occurring exactly once

On 2024-06-08, Larry Martell via Python-list wrote: > The original question struck me as homework or an interview question for a > junior position. But having no clear requirements or specifications is good > training for the real world where that is often the case. When you question > that, you

RE: From JoyceUlysses.txt -- words occurring exactly once

I agree with Larry that the OP was asking something that might be fair to use in an interview process where perhaps an exact answer is not as important as showing how the person thinks about a process. The original question can be incomplete or vague. Do they give up? Do they ask careful

Re: From JoyceUlysses.txt -- words occurring exactly once

On 6/8/2024 2:46 PM, avi.e.gr...@gmail.com wrote: Agreed, Thomas. As someone who has spent lots of time writing code OR requirements of various levels or having to deal with the bugs afterwards, there can be a huge disconnect between the people trying to decide what to do and the people

Re: IDLE: clearing the screen

OK, here is the advanced version: import os class _cls(object):     def __repr__(self):         os.system('cls')         return '' cls = _cls() Now when you type cls it clears the screen.  The only flaw is that there is a blank line at the very top of the screen, and the ">>>" prompt appears on

RE: From JoyceUlysses.txt -- words occurring exactly once

Agreed, Thomas. As someone who has spent lots of time writing code OR requirements of various levels or having to deal with the bugs afterwards, there can be a huge disconnect between the people trying to decide what to do and the people having to do it. It is not necessarily easy to come

Re: From JoyceUlysses.txt -- words occurring exactly once

On 6/8/2024 11:54 AM, Larry Martell via Python-list wrote: On Sat, Jun 8, 2024 at 10:39 AM Mats Wichmann via Python-list < python-list@python.org> wrote: On 6/5/24 05:10, Thomas Passin via Python-list wrote: Of course, we see this lack of clarity all the time in questions to the list. I

Re: From JoyceUlysses.txt -- words occurring exactly once

On Sat, Jun 8, 2024 at 10:39 AM Mats Wichmann via Python-list < python-list@python.org> wrote: > On 6/5/24 05:10, Thomas Passin via Python-list wrote: > > > Of course, we see this lack of clarity all the time in questions to the > > list. I often wonder how these askers can possibly come up with

Re: From JoyceUlysses.txt -- words occurring exactly once

On 6/5/24 05:10, Thomas Passin via Python-list wrote: Of course, we see this lack of clarity all the time in questions to the list.  I often wonder how these askers can possibly come up with acceptable code if they don't realize they don't truly know what it's supposed to do. Fortunately,

[RELEASE] Python 3.12.4 released

Last minute bugs in test environments notwithstanding, 3.12.4 is now available! https://www.python.org/downloads/release/python-3124/

[RELEASE] Python 3.13.0 beta 2 released.

After a little bit of a delay (I blame the flat tire on my rental car), 3.13.0b2 is released: https://www.python.org/downloads/release/python-3130b2/

Re: From JoyceUlysses.txt -- words occurring exactly once

On 6/5/2024 12:33 AM, dn via Python-list wrote: On 31/05/24 14:26, HenHanna via Python-list wrote: On 5/30/2024 2:18 PM, dn wrote: On 31/05/24 08:03, HenHanna via Python-list wrote: Given a text file of a novel (JoyceUlysses.txt) ... could someone give me a pretty fast (and simple) Python

Re: Fwd: IDLE: clearing the screen

On 05/06/2024 04:09, Cameron Simpson wrote: On 04Jun2024 22:43, Rob Cliffe wrote: import os def cls(): x=os.system("cls") Now whenever you type cls() it will clear the screen and show the prompt at the top of the screen. (The reason for the "x=" is: os.system returns a result, in this case

Re: From JoyceUlysses.txt -- words occurring exactly once

On 2024-06-05, dn via Python-list wrote: > If you/your teacher can't define a "word", the code, any code, will > almost-certainly be wrong! Back when I was a student... When there was a homework/project assignemnt with a vague requirement (and it wasn't practical to get the requirement

Re: From JoyceUlysses.txt -- words occurring exactly once

On 31/05/24 14:26, HenHanna via Python-list wrote: On 5/30/2024 2:18 PM, dn wrote: On 31/05/24 08:03, HenHanna via Python-list wrote: Given a text file of a novel (JoyceUlysses.txt) ... could someone give me a pretty fast (and simple) Python program that'd give me a list of all words

Re: Fwd: IDLE: clearing the screen

On 04Jun2024 22:43, Rob Cliffe wrote: import os def cls(): x=os.system("cls") Now whenever you type cls() it will clear the screen and show the prompt at the top of the screen. (The reason for the "x=" is: os.system returns a result, in this case 0.  When you evaluate an expression in the

Re: From JoyceUlysses.txt -- words occurring exactly once

On Wed, 5 Jun 2024 at 02:49, Edward Teach via Python-list wrote: > > On Mon, 03 Jun 2024 14:58:26 -0400 (EDT) > Grant Edwards wrote: > > > On 2024-06-03, Edward Teach via Python-list > > wrote: > > > > > The Gutenburg Project publishes "plain text". That's another > > > problem, because "plain

Fwd: IDLE: clearing the screen

Welcome to Python!  A great language for program development. Answers might be platform-dependent (are you using WIndows, Linux, etc.). However, the following works for me on WIndows.  You can put it in the startup.py file so you don't have to type it every time you start up the IDLE. import

RE: From JoyceUlysses.txt -- words occurring exactly once

>> Well.when using the file linux.words as a useful master list of >> "words".linux.words is strict ASCII The meaning of "words" depends on the context. The contents of the file mentioned are a minor attempt to capture a common subset of words in English but probably are not what

Re: From JoyceUlysses.txt -- words occurring exactly once

On 2024-06-04, Edward Teach via Python-list wrote: > On Mon, 03 Jun 2024 14:58:26 -0400 (EDT) > Grant Edwards wrote: > >> On 2024-06-03, Edward Teach via Python-list >> wrote: >> >> > The Gutenburg Project publishes "plain text". That's another >> > problem, because "plain text" means

IDLE: clearing the screen

Hello everyone, I am new to Python, and I have been using IDLE (v3.10.11) to run small Python code. However, I have seen that the output scrolls to the bottom in the output window. Is there a way to clear the output window (something like cls in command prompt or clear in terminal), so

Re: From JoyceUlysses.txt -- words occurring exactly once

On Mon, 03 Jun 2024 14:58:26 -0400 (EDT) Grant Edwards wrote: > On 2024-06-03, Edward Teach via Python-list > wrote: > > > The Gutenburg Project publishes "plain text". That's another > > problem, because "plain text" means UTF-8and that means > > unicode...and that means running some

Re: From JoyceUlysses.txt -- words occurring exactly once

Edward Teach wrote at 2024-6-3 10:47 +0100: > ... >The Gutenburg Project publishes "plain text". That's another problem, >because "plain text" means UTF-8and that means unicode...and that >means running some sort of unicode-to-ascii conversion in order to get >something like "words". A

Re: From JoyceUlysses.txt -- words occurring exactly once

On 2024-06-03, Edward Teach via Python-list wrote: > The Gutenburg Project publishes "plain text". That's another > problem, because "plain text" means UTF-8and that means > unicode...and that means running some sort of unicode-to-ascii > conversion in order to get something like "words".

Re: From JoyceUlysses.txt -- words occurring exactly once

On Sat, 1 Jun 2024 13:34:11 -0600 Mats Wichmann wrote: > On 5/31/24 11:59, Dieter Maurer via Python-list wrote: > > hmmm, I "sent" this but there was some problem and it remained > unsent. Just in case it hasn't All Been Said Already, here's the > retry: > > > HenHanna wrote at 2024-5-30 13:03

Cannot install python properly - python310.dll not found - no pip

Hi. I'm attempting to install and use stable diffusion. However, while installing python 3.10.6, I'm getting the error that the python 310.dll is not found. I've made sure the PATH option is enabled, but it makes no difference. I've also removed and reinstalled python multiple times. Even

Re: From JoyceUlysses.txt -- words occurring exactly once

On 5/31/24 11:59, Dieter Maurer via Python-list wrote: hmmm, I "sent" this but there was some problem and it remained unsent. Just in case it hasn't All Been Said Already, here's the retry: HenHanna wrote at 2024-5-30 13:03 -0700: Given a text file of a novel (JoyceUlysses.txt) ... could

Re: From JoyceUlysses.txt -- words occurring exactly once

On 6/1/2024 4:04 AM, Peter J. Holzer via Python-list wrote: On 2024-05-30 19:26:37 -0700, HenHanna via Python-list wrote: hard to decide what to do with hyphens and apostrophes (I'd, he's, can't, haven't, A's and B's) Especially since the same character is

Re: Lprint = ( Lisp-style printing ( of lists and strings (etc.) ) in Python )

On 2024-05-30 21:47:14 -0700, HenHanna via Python-list wrote: > [('the', 36225), ('and', 17551), ('of', 16759), ('i', 16696), ('a', 15816), > ('to', 15722), ('that', 11252), ('in', 10743), ('it', 10687)] > > ((the 36225) (and 17551) (of 16759) (i 16696) (a 15816) (to 15722) (that > 11252) (in

Re: From JoyceUlysses.txt -- words occurring exactly once

On 2024-05-30 19:26:37 -0700, HenHanna via Python-list wrote: > hard to decide what to do with hyphens >and apostrophes > (I'd, he's, can't, haven't, A's and B's) Especially since the same character is used as both an apostrophe and a closing quotation mark. And

Re: From JoyceUlysses.txt -- words occurring exactly once

On 5/30/2024 4:03 PM, HenHanna via Python-list wrote: Given a text file of a novel (JoyceUlysses.txt) ... could someone give me a pretty fast (and simple) Python program that'd give me a list of all words occurring exactly once?   -- Also, a list of words occurring once, twice

Re: From JoyceUlysses.txt -- words occurring exactly once

HenHanna wrote at 2024-5-30 13:03 -0700: > >Given a text file of a novel (JoyceUlysses.txt) ... > >could someone give me a pretty fast (and simple) Python program that'd >give me a list of all words occurring exactly once? Your task can be split into several subtasks: * parse the text into words

Re: From JoyceUlysses.txt -- words occurring exactly once

On 2024-05-31, Pieter van Oostrum via Python-list wrote: > HenHanna writes: > >> Given a text file of a novel (JoyceUlysses.txt) ... >> >> could someone give me a pretty fast (and simple) Python program that'd >> give me a list of all words occurring exactly once? >> >> -- Also, a

Lprint = ( Lisp-style printing ( of lists and strings (etc.) ) in Python )

;;; Pls tell me about little tricks you use in Python or Lisp. [('the', 36225), ('and', 17551), ('of', 16759), ('i', 16696), ('a', 15816), ('to', 15722), ('that', 11252), ('in', 10743), ('it', 10687)] ((the 36225) (and 17551) (of 16759) (i 16696) (a 15816) (to 15722) (that

Re: From JoyceUlysses.txt -- words occurring exactly once

On 5/30/2024 2:18 PM, dn wrote: On 31/05/24 08:03, HenHanna via Python-list wrote: Given a text file of a novel (JoyceUlysses.txt) ... could someone give me a pretty fast (and simple) Python program that'd give me a list of all words occurring exactly once?    -- Also, a list

Re: From JoyceUlysses.txt -- words occurring exactly once

HenHanna writes: > Given a text file of a novel (JoyceUlysses.txt) ... > > could someone give me a pretty fast (and simple) Python program that'd > give me a list of all words occurring exactly once? > > -- Also, a list of words occurring once, twice or 3 times > > > > re:

Re: From JoyceUlysses.txt -- words occurring exactly once

On 31/05/24 08:03, HenHanna via Python-list wrote: Given a text file of a novel (JoyceUlysses.txt) ... could someone give me a pretty fast (and simple) Python program that'd give me a list of all words occurring exactly once?   -- Also, a list of words occurring once, twice or

From JoyceUlysses.txt -- words occurring exactly once

Given a text file of a novel (JoyceUlysses.txt) ... could someone give me a pretty fast (and simple) Python program that'd give me a list of all words occurring exactly once? -- Also, a list of words occurring once, twice or 3 times re: hyphenated words(you can

Re: Any marginally usable programming language approaches an ill defined barely usable re-implementation of half of Common-Lisp

On 2024-05-29 at 11:39:14 -0700, HenHanna via Python-list wrote: > On 5/27/2024 1:59 PM, 2qdxy4rzwzuui...@potatochowder.com wrote: > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenspun%27s_tenth_rule [...] > Are the Rules 1--9 by Greenspun good too? I don't know; let me look it up. Oh, there it

Re: Serializing pydantic enums

On 5/29/24 13:27, Larry Martell via Python-list wrote: On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 11:46 AM Left Right via Python-list wrote: Most Python objects aren't serializable into JSON. Pydantic isn't special in this sense. What can you do about this? -- Well, if this is a one-of situation, then, maybe

Re: Serializing pydantic enums

On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 12:27 PM Larry Martell wrote: > > On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 11:46 AM Left Right via Python-list > wrote: > > > > Most Python objects aren't serializable into JSON. Pydantic isn't > > special in this sense. > > > > What can you do about this? -- Well, if this is a one-of

Re: SOLVED! Re: Weird Stuff (Markdown, syntax highlighting and Python)

On 29/05/24 06:49, Gilmeh Serda via Python-list wrote: Solved by using a different method. Hedonist for hire... no job too easy! This combination of sig-file and content seems sadly ironic. How about CONTRIBUTING to the community by explaining 'the solution' to people who may find a

Re: Any marginally usable programming language approaches an ill defined barely usable re-implementation of half of Common-Lisp

On 2024-05-29, HenHanna wrote: > On 5/27/2024 1:59 PM, 2qdxy4rzwzuui...@potatochowder.com wrote: >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenspun%27s_tenth_rule > > > interesting!!! > > Are the Rules 1--9 by Greenspun good too? I don't think they exist; it's a joke. However, Greenspun's resume

Re: Any marginally usable programming language approaches an ill defined barely usable re-implementation of half of Common-Lisp

On 5/27/2024 1:59 PM, 2qdxy4rzwzuui...@potatochowder.com wrote: On 2024-05-27 at 12:37:01 -0700, HenHanna via Python-list wrote: On 5/27/2024 7:18 AM, Cor wrote: Some entity, AKA "B. Pym" , wrote this mindboggling stuff: (selectively-snipped-or-not-p) On 12/16/2023, c...@clsnet.nl

Re: Serializing pydantic enums

On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 11:46 AM Left Right via Python-list wrote: > > Most Python objects aren't serializable into JSON. Pydantic isn't > special in this sense. > > What can you do about this? -- Well, if this is a one-of situation, > then, maybe just do it by hand? > > If this is a recurring

Re: Flubbed it in the second interation through the string: range error... HOW?

On 5/29/2024 10:59 AM, MRAB via Python-list wrote: On 2024-05-29 15:32, Thomas Passin via Python-list wrote: On 5/29/2024 8:55 AM, Kevin M. Wilson wrote: Please recall, I said the format for the email failed to retain the proper indents. I'll attach a picture of the code! Purpose; to

Re: Flubbed it in the second interation through the string: range error... HOW?

On 2024-05-29, Mats Wichmann via Python-list wrote: > On 5/29/24 08:02, Grant Edwards via Python-list wrote: >> On 2024-05-29, Chris Angelico via Python-list wrote: >> >>> print(f"if block {name[index]=} {index=}") >> >> Holy cow! How did I not know about the f-string {=} thing? > > It's more

Re: Flubbed it in the second interation through the string: range error... HOW?

On 2024-05-29 15:32, Thomas Passin via Python-list wrote: On 5/29/2024 8:55 AM, Kevin M. Wilson wrote: Please recall, I said the format for the email failed to retain the proper indents. I'll attach a picture of the code! Purpose; to uppercase every other letter in a string. Thanks all, KMW

Re: Flubbed it in the second interation through the string: range error... HOW?

> On 29 May 2024, at 05:38, Kevin M. Wilson via Python-list > wrote: > > The format in this email is not of my making, should someone know, how to do > this so that it's a readable script do tell! > KMW Your mail program may have a plain-text mode to compose messages in try using that.

Re: Flubbed it in the second interation through the string: range error... HOW?

On 5/29/2024 8:55 AM, Kevin M. Wilson wrote: Please recall, I said the format for the email failed to retain the proper indents. I'll attach a picture of the code! Purpose; to uppercase every other letter in a string. Thanks all, KMW Simpler is good, and readability is good. For a simple

Re: Flubbed it in the second interation through the string: range error... HOW?

On 5/29/24 08:02, Grant Edwards via Python-list wrote: On 2024-05-29, Chris Angelico via Python-list wrote: print(f"if block {name[index]=} {index=}") Holy cow! How did I not know about the f-string {=} thing? It's more recent than f-strings in general, so it's not that hard to miss. --

Re: Flubbed it in the second interation through the string: range error... HOW?

On 2024-05-29, Chris Angelico via Python-list wrote: > print(f"if block {name[index]=} {index=}") Holy cow! How did I not know about the f-string {=} thing? -- Grant -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: Formatted Output and Argument Parsing (was: Re: Flubbed it in the second interation through the string: range error... HOW?)

On Wed, 29 May 2024 at 23:06, Dan Sommers via Python-list wrote: > (For the history-impaired, getopt existed long before Python and will > likely exist long after it, but getopt's "replacement" optparse lasted > only from 2003 until 2011.) Depends on your definition of "lasted". It's not getting

Formatted Output and Argument Parsing (was: Re: Flubbed it in the second interation through the string: range error... HOW?)

On 2024-05-29 at 17:14:51 +1000, Chris Angelico via Python-list wrote: > I wouldn't replace str.format() everywhere, nor would I replace > percent encoding everywhere - but in this case, I think Thomas is > correct. Not because it's 2024 (f-strings were brought in back in > 2015, so they're

Re: Flubbed it in the second interation through the string: range error... HOW?

On 5/29/2024 3:14 AM, Chris Angelico via Python-list wrote: On Wed, 29 May 2024 at 16:03, Cameron Simpson via Python-list wrote: By which Thomas means stuff like this: print(f'if block {name[index]} and index {index}') Notice the leading "f'". Personally I wouldn't even go that far,

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >