Mike == Mike Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Mike IPython's pysh seems a little clumsy for interactive use, as
Mike it requires special characters to distinguish between
Mike commands to be passed to the shell and commands to be passed
Mike to the scripting language. This should
Mike == Mike Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Mike I've actually done some work on using CORBA as a COM for
Mike Unix (or, as I think of it, an ARexx for Unix). After being
Mike exposed to Plan 9, I've decided that's a better
Mike solution. CORBA has the advantage that you can
Ville Vainio [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Mike == Mike Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Mike IPython's pysh seems a little clumsy for interactive use, as
Mike it requires special characters to distinguish between
Mike commands to be passed to the shell and commands to be passed
Mike Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Arich Chanachai [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
When the CLR is integrated, it will allow a wide array of problem
solving choices for uuu users.
You've missed the point. Allowing a wide array of problem solving
choices is
Donn == Donn Cave [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Donn I don't know what the Windows version is like, but for all
Donn the UNIX shell's weaknesses, it's very well suited to its
Donn role. The Plan 9
I don't know about that - I don't see anything in shell that couldn't
be done better in
Nick Coghlan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Mike Meyer wrote:
Arich Chanachai [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Mike Meyer wrote:
Whatever the intentions may be, the *act* is one of dictation. Since
the point of the underlying OS is to increase the interconnections
between applications (assuming I've
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul Boddie) writes:
Mike Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Arich Chanachai [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
When the CLR is integrated, it will allow a wide array of problem
solving choices for uuu users.
You've missed the point. Allowing a
Mike Meyer wrote:
Arich Chanachai [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Mike Meyer wrote:
Whatever the intentions may be, the *act* is one of dictation. Since
the point of the underlying OS is to increase the interconnections
between applications (assuming I've found the correct web page and
interpreted it
Paul Rubin wrote:
Nick Coghlan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Compare out-of-the-box Python:
a = 1 + 2 + 3 + 4
And out-of-the-box Lisp:
(setq a (+ 1 2 3 4))
Which language has the lower barrier for entry? That should be a
fairly important consideration for a language that is going to sit at
the
Quoth Nick Coghlan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[... re Python OS interface vs. language-generic model ]
| *Allowing* other languages is one thing, but that shouldn't preclude having a
| 'default' language. On other OS's, the default language is some form of shell
| scripting (i.e. Unix shell scripts, or
Arich Chanachai [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Mike Meyer wrote:
Whatever the intentions may be, the *act* is one of dictation. Since
the point of the underlying OS is to increase the interconnections
between applications (assuming I've found the correct web page and
interpreted it correctly), the
pythonUser_07 wrote:
Some quick thoughts.
1- Python is not new relatively speaking.
Quite true, good point.
2)- Python is a natural language for learning basic scripting, but can
carry you through to object oriented program.
3)- Knowing python, instantly gets you access to jython. I've found
I see your point.
Consider points 2 and 3 a nice side effect.
The language I favor actually ties into the environment I am working
in: Python for rapid prototyping, java for larger projects where the
eclipse IDE comes in very handy.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Arich Chanachai [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
These last two points kind of diverge from the point, no? What I mean
is that we want to present the argument of why Python is the best
choice as THE built-in programming language for the revolutionary uuu
operating system.
A new operating system
Mike Meyer wrote:
Arich Chanachai [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
These last two points kind of diverge from the point, no? What I mean
is that we want to present the argument of why Python is the best
choice as THE built-in programming language for the revolutionary uuu
operating system.
A new
Arich Chanachai [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Mike Meyer wrote:
Arich Chanachai [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
These last two points kind of diverge from the point, no? What I mean
is that we want to present the argument of why Python is the best
choice as THE built-in programming language for the
Mike Meyer wrote:
Arich Chanachai [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Mike Meyer wrote:
Arich Chanachai [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
These last two points kind of diverge from the point, no? What I mean
is that we want to present the argument of why Python is the best
choice as THE built-in
Arich == Arich Chanachai [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Arich From: Richard Taytor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Arich To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Arich Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2005 4:28 PM
Arich Subject: [Uuu-devel] languages
First, thank you for Unununium. I first learned of the project
18 matches
Mail list logo
