Steve Holden wrote:
Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
comp.lang.python / comp.lang.ruby
I would like to ask for feedback on the Process Definition and
Presentation.
[...]
Based on the summary of the feedback so far, I've focused on one page
- the main page:
Although it
Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
comp.lang.python / comp.lang.ruby
-
I would like to ask for feedback on the Process Definition and
Presentation.
Essentially this is exactly what I've myself specialized to do.
But I cannot apply the process to my own system.
[...]
Your feedback is _very_
Xavier Morel wrote:
Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
b) to retrieve feedback subjecting the Process Definition itself
(content of diagramms, clarity, terminology etc.)
You are merely some kind of strange troll. You've built something that
[...] - (off topic comments)
note to readers: most of the
Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
b) to retrieve feedback subjecting the Process Definition itself
(content of diagramms, clarity, terminology etc.)
This is a lie, and you know it.
You are merely some kind of strange troll. You've built something that
you consider the only object model worth using
comp.lang.python / comp.lang.ruby
-
I would like to ask for feedback on the Process Definition and Presentation.
Essentially this is exactly what I've myself specialized to do.
But I cannot apply the process to my own system.
I ask here, as I have criticized those 2 groups publically - and
Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
comp.lang.python / comp.lang.ruby
-
I would like to ask for feedback on the Process Definition and
Presentation.
Essentially this is exactly what I've myself specialized to do.
But I cannot apply the process to my own system.
I ask here, as I have
Claudio Grondi wrote:
Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
comp.lang.python / comp.lang.ruby
-
I would like to ask for feedback on the Process Definition and
Presentation.
Essentially this is exactly what I've myself specialized to do.
But I cannot apply the process to my own system.
I ask here,
