I think this is possible if I understand what happens under the hood.
I wonder how event loop and async io functions such as
asyncio.open_connection cooperate to do async io in one thread. Maybe it
exploits low-level details and is OS or even device specific. I think I
should take a look at the sou
王珺 wrote:
Suppose io_operation() takes 3 seconds, then how can I write something like
future = io_operation()
print('Start')
time.sleep(1)
print('Something')
time.sleep(2)
print(future.result())
that print 'Start' immediately and the result of io_operation() 3 seconds
later.
Yes, Python can d
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 9:13 AM, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> Ian Kelly :
>
>> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 8:23 AM, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
>>> Tem Pl :
Is there something wrong with this implementation?
>>>
>>> It's a "fork bomb".
>>
>> Isn't that the point of the benchmark?
>
> I don't quite see the
Ian Kelly :
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 8:23 AM, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
>> Tem Pl :
>>> Is there something wrong with this implementation?
>>
>> It's a "fork bomb".
>
> Isn't that the point of the benchmark?
I don't quite see the point of the program as it doesn't resemble
anything I'd ever have an
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 8:23 AM, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> Tem Pl :
>
>> Here are some concurrency benchmarks for python vs other languages.
>>
>> https://github.com/atemerev/skynet/pull/53
>>
>> Is there something wrong with this implementation?
>
> It's a "fork bomb".
Isn't that the point of the
Tem Pl :
> Here are some concurrency benchmarks for python vs other languages.
>
> https://github.com/atemerev/skynet/pull/53
>
> Is there something wrong with this implementation?
It's a "fork bomb".
Marko
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Here are some concurrency benchmarks for python vs other languages.
https://github.com/atemerev/skynet/pull/53
Is there something wrong with this implementation?
"Hope I suck at coroutines, because the results are abysmal.
I get around 63s on my i5 MacBook Air Early 2015. For reference, the go
It seems an event loop is required for all async programs in python, but
sometimes I need only lazy i/o. Is it possible with asyncio?
Suppose io_operation() takes 3 seconds, then how can I write something like
future = io_operation()
print('Start')
time.sleep(1)
print('Something')
time.sleep(2)
See also Doug Hellmann article on asyncio, from its serie of "Python 3
Module of the Week" articles:
https://pymotw.com/3/asyncio/index.html
Victor
2016-02-23 22:25 GMT+01:00 Joao S. O. Bueno :
> Today I also stumbled on this helpful "essay" from Brett Cannon about
> the same subject
>
> http://w
On 24 February 2016 at 02:37, Terry Reedy wrote:
>
> In this essay, Brett says that asyncio added an event loop to Python. It
> did, but it was the second. The tk event loop was added about 20 years ago
> with tkinter.
One of the things I would love to see (but don't have the time to work
on) is
Today I also stumbled on this helpful "essay" from Brett Cannon about
the same subject
http://www.snarky.ca/how-the-heck-does-async-await-work-in-python-3-5
On 23 February 2016 at 18:05, Sven R. Kunze wrote:
> On 20.02.2016 07:53, Christian Gollwitzer wrote:
>
> If you have difficulties wit hthe
11 matches
Mail list logo
