In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And, FWIW, I don't think I could convince my wife (or myself) to move
to CullyFORNya for any amount of money, whether there was a massage
therapist on duty or not...
Google also has technical offices in the New York area.
--
Duncan Booth wrote:
Alex Martelli wrote:
It IS true that in Python you cannot set arbitrary attributes on
arbitrary objects. The workaround is to use a dict, indexed by the id
of the object you want to set arbitrary attributes on; this has the
helpful consequence that separate namespaces
On 11 Jan 2006 21:30:11 -0800 in comp.lang.python,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Aahz) wrote:
[..]
Side note: I don't have a degree, and I interviewed at Google several
years ago. I'm about 97% certain that my lack of degree played little
role (if any) in my failure to get a job offer.
Side note: I have
Dave Hansen wrote:
Not that I expected to. I just did it for fun. I'm not sure what
Google would do with someone whose entire work experience has been
developing C code for small embedded controllers anyway.
http://www.ftrain.com/robot_exclusion_protocol.html
/F
--
On 12 Jan 2006 16:16:58 -0800 in comp.lang.python,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Aahz) wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And, FWIW, I don't think I could convince my wife (or myself) to move
to CullyFORNya for any amount of money, whether there was a massage
Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Google also has technical offices in the New York area.
City? shudder. I moved out of the 'burbs of Minneapolis about 6
years ago, not because of the weather, but because it was getting too
crowded for me.
Yep, city -- specifically on Broadway,
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Tue, 03 Jan 2006 08:27:39 -0800, Alex Martelli wrote:
Or some even more stringent qualification, such as the state's Bar exam
for lawyers -- you may not be able to sit for that exam w/o the
appropriate degree, but the degree by itself is not enough, you still
have to
Steve Holden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wrong [see above]. I don't remember many mediaeval cathedrals falling down.
Your memory of medieval times has gone a bit hazy I expect; in truth,
some would fall down from time to time, particularly if the builders tried
Alex Martelli wrote:
Anton Vredegoor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
You are not my superior (or even considered to be more succesfull) as
you seem to imply.
Depends on who does the considering, I'm sure. If the considerer loves
the English language, for example, a horrible mis-spelling
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 23:13:01 +,
Steve Holden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
attempt to draw direct comparisons. Maybe having an uncle helped you in
to the trade, but it didn't cut you much slack in terms of required
standards, hence the absence of cathedral-shaped heaps of rubble. York
Steve Holden wrote:
Consider yourself excused.
Thanks.
Anton
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
TAG.did.you.just.call.me.a.kook.questionmark
TAG.no.dash.but.if.you.keep.replying.to.them.all.the.time.i.may.have.to.plonk.you.too.smiley
TAG.you're.it.exclamation.point.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Richard Brodie wrote:
Wrong [see above]. I don't remember many mediaeval cathedrals falling down.
Your memory of medieval times has gone a bit hazy I expect
probably because he was hit in the head by a falling stone during a trip to
southern
france, many years ago.
/F
--
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Alex Martelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Giving outstanding contributions to open-source projects or others made
feasible by the internet is, of course, another hard to fake signal
in terms of asymmetric-information markets. And of course, Google will
happily accept
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Steve Holden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The major problem with professional bodies is precisely their lack of
insistence on a practical demonstration of capability. Paper MCSEs,
for example, frequently make bad Windows system administrators because
their education has
Hi Alex,
On Mon, 9 Jan 2006, Alex Martelli wrote:
50%, yes (the other 50% must come from private contributions, that's a
EU rule for research projects). It used to be thought that some of the
EU money could be used to help pay for sprint participants' travel
expenses, but apparently
Hi Alex,
On Mon, 9 Jan 2006, Alex Martelli wrote:
50%, yes (the other 50% must come from private contributions, that's a
EU rule for research projects). It used to be thought that some of the
EU money could be used to help pay for sprint participants' travel
expenses, but apparently
Armin Rigo wrote:
We have some procedure now for funding
travel costs, although it's admittedly very bureaucratic :-(
Since next sprint is in Palma de Mallorca I trust I can count on PyPy
to refund me the money?
Anyway, independently of this, there are some people we are happy to see
come
Alex Martelli wrote:
situations, and in a few cases been able to help them back up. People
who attempt to *guilt-trip* me into helping have never been and will
never been in that lot: in this way, I'm definitely not a typical, guilt
driven bleeding heart. I try to help people who are trying
Anton Vredegoor wrote:
[stuuf]
'excuse me if I sound a bit bitter and as if suffering from a sense of
untitlement'
Consider yourself excused. Now stop whining and go do the things you *can*.
regards
Steve
--
Steve Holden +44 150 684 7255 +1 800 494 3119
Holden Web LLC
Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
[...]
[...]
-
TAG.google.evolution.talent.detection
TAG.who.gives.a.rats.ass
--
Steve Holden +44 150 684 7255 +1 800 494 3119
Holden Web LLC www.holdenweb.com
PyCon TX 2006 www.python.org/pycon/
--
Hi!
Anton Vredegoor wrote:
Armin Rigo wrote:
We have some procedure now for funding
travel costs, although it's admittedly very bureaucratic :-(
Since next sprint is in Palma de Mallorca I trust I can count on PyPy
to refund me the money?
If you want to attend the sprint you should
TAG.how.come.this.thread.generates.kooks.faster.than.I.can.plonk.them.questionmark
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
TAG.how.come.this.thread.generates.kooks.faster.than.I.can.plonk.them.questionmark
TAG.did.you.just.call.me.a.kook.questionmark
TAG.above.tag.not.actually.valid
--
Steve Holden +44 150 684 7255 +1 800 494 3119
Holden Web LLC www.holdenweb.com
TAG.did.you.just.call.me.a.kook.questionmark
TAG.no.dash.but.if.you.keep.replying.to.them.all.the.time.i.may.have.to.plonk.you.too.smiley
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Anton Vredegoor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
On the bureaucratic side: Alex, we *have* a procedure at this point, and
we have been trying to contact you several time in the past months -- with
no success as far as I know, so I'll try via comp.lang.python this time
:-) If you still feel
Anton Vredegoor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
You are not my superior (or even considered to be more succesfull) as
you seem to imply.
Depends on who does the considering, I'm sure. If the considerer loves
the English language, for example, a horrible mis-spelling such as
successfull with
Anton Vredegoor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
I already sent some reply via google, got a server error, resent, got a
confirmation that my message was posted, but it doesn't show up and also
there's no way to retrieve my message except fishing in the cache?
Yesterday I had a post not showing
Alex Martelli wrote:
Anton Vredegoor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However I still maintain that I was never able to meet these fine
people you speak about and which you seem to know because the cost
involved (a few hundred euro to visit pycon for example) was too high
compared to my food
Alex Martelli wrote:
Anton Vredegoor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However I still maintain that I was never able to meet these fine
people you speak about and which you seem to know because the cost
involved (a few hundred euro to visit pycon for example) was too high
compared to my food
Alex Martelli wrote:
I just don't understand, always assuming you're in the Netherlands, how
attending Europython in Belgium (as opposed to Pycon in the US) could
have cost hundreds of euros. Conference registration is free to
speakers, bicycling NL-BE not costly (many were driving from NL,
Anton Vredegoor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
I looked it up: 160 euro (early registration). My food budget is about
_Free for conference staff_: i.e., you could choose to contribute either
by volunteering your work to help organize and run the conference, or by
paying. This is a reasonably
Anton Vredegoor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Ah, I see. You're approaching this from a 'speaker' scenario. You
already have a lot of contacts, know where you can sleep, where to eat
I am active in the community, and have long been, trying to help out to
the best of my abilities. Should I
Anton Vredegoor wrote:
Now going back to my claim that elitism is bad, I think you are the
perfect proof of my point. You live in luxurious (with respect to
community, education and financial aspects of being a computer scientist
or programmer) conditions and can just not understand why some
Anton Vredegoor wrote:
Alex Martelli wrote:
I just don't understand, always assuming you're in the Netherlands, how
attending Europython in Belgium (as opposed to Pycon in the US) could
have cost hundreds of euros. Conference registration is free to
speakers, bicycling NL-BE not costly (many
Anton Vredegoor wrote:
[...]
But frankly indeed, I just don't even like to participate to events
that claim to be open for all but don't even acknowledge that the
barriers are extremely high compared to some participants budgets. Your
hype about it being cheap has a very chilling effect on my
Steve Holden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
On the available evidence that seems completely untrue. Alex, as I know
from personal experience, has no problems accepting the material rewards
of a lifetime spent developing expertise, but that doesn't make him
elitist.
I guess what DOES make me
Alex Martelli wrote:
Anton Vredegoor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However I still maintain that I was never able to meet these fine
people you speak about and which you seem to know because the cost
involved (a few hundred euro to visit pycon for example) was too high
compared to my food
Anton Vredegoor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Europython is cheap to attend, and has been held twice in Charleroi,
Belgium, for example -- if you're in the Netherlands, you could have
...
The gist of it is that for me a few hundred euros is and was a *lot* of
money, and that this talk
Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
[...]
For Software Engineer:
Requirements:
* BS or MS in Computer Science or equivalent (PhD a plus).
Right here.
This requirement is really funny.
I thought google is somehow different.
[...]
from within this thread:
Anton Vredegoor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However I still maintain that I was never able to meet these fine
people you speak about and which you seem to know because the cost
involved (a few hundred euro to visit pycon for example) was too high
compared to my food budget.
Europython is cheap
On Jan 3, 2006, at 9:54 PM, Brian van den Broek wrote:
Steven D'Aprano said unto the world upon 03/01/06 07:33 PM:
On Tue, 03 Jan 2006 08:27:39 -0800, Alex Martelli wrote:
Or some even more stringent qualification, such as the state's
Bar exam
for lawyers -- you may not be able to sit
Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
I estimate that there is a unfreeze operation, too - which would lead
to flexibity.
There is none, you have to make a copy of the object via the dup
(duplicate) method to get an unfrozen copy (note: clone yields an exact
copy, which means that it's still frozen).
Xavier Morel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
thus if I make a typo, I create a new attribute?
Why yes of course, what were you expecting?
Actually, it's not quite that way. If you make a typo reading an
attribute, you'll create an exception. There are languages where
making
DaveM wrote:
On 3 Jan 2006 20:09:34 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Aahz) wrote:
Unfortunately, this isn't quite true. Medicine and law both require the
passing of an apprenticeship, so there's still some room for favoritism
and blackballing.
In the UK, in Medicine, House Officer jobs pretty
On Wednesday 28 Dec 2005 17:58:33, Robert Kern wrote:
...
Sorry to reply to the thread so late in the day, but I noticed (via
QOTW :-( ) that Anton got worked up at me suggesting that congratulating
someone with a new job was a nice idea (surprised me too - all the
Google employees I've met have
Alex Martelli wrote:
Ilias Lazaridis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
possibly one can provide the code for something similar to the ruby
attr_accessor:
class Talker
def sayHello
puts Hello world
end
attr_accessor :name, :age
end
thus they can later be accessed this way
Michael Sparks wrote:
Sorry to reply to the thread so late in the day, but I noticed (via
QOTW :-( ) that Anton got worked up at me suggesting that congratulating
someone with a new job was a nice idea (surprised me too - all the
Google employees I've met have been very nice people), read the
Ilias Lazaridis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
attr_accessor :name, :age
...
I would need this python attr_accessor, to showcase that python is
capable to do it (even if the usage seems irrational/redundant).
The code for it was in one of my previous posts, in more than one form,
but
Brian van den Broek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(I do realize that US data isn't most pertinent to Steven, Alex or
myself -- au, it, ca -- but it is ready to hand. Shamefully, my
Actually, I've been living in the US for over 9 months now, and like all
immigrants I have more dealings with
Alex Martelli wrote:
Ilias Lazaridis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
attr_accessor :name, :age
I would need this python attr_accessor, to showcase that python is
capable to do it (even if the usage seems irrational/redundant).
[...] - (comments, code outside the body)
def
On 3 Jan 2006 20:09:34 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Aahz) wrote:
Unfortunately, this isn't quite true. Medicine and law both require the
passing of an apprenticeship, so there's still some room for favoritism
and blackballing.
In the UK, in Medicine, House Officer jobs pretty much match the
Alex Martelli wrote:
Ilias Lazaridis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
... or equivalent (I do believe all I named have at least a Bachelor
degree, but with the undisputable results they've shown afterwards, I
think they'd all meet the or equivalent clause anyway).
* BS or MS in Computer
Alex Martelli wrote:
It IS true that in Python you cannot set arbitrary attributes on
arbitrary objects. The workaround is to use a dict, indexed by the id
of the object you want to set arbitrary attributes on; this has the
helpful consequence that separate namespaces are used, so your
Alex Martelli wrote:
Anton Vredegoor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
No insider information is necessary, the job requirements make it
absolutely clear (at least to me) that Google is a company with an
elitist culture,
Absolutely yes, in terms of who we want to work at Google: we DO want
Ilias Lazaridis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Ok, thus Google is flexible in this.
[sidenote: some jobs _require_ a degree by law]
Or some even more stringent qualification, such as the state's Bar exam
for lawyers -- you may not be able to sit for that exam w/o the
appropriate degree, but
Duncan Booth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alex Martelli wrote:
It IS true that in Python you cannot set arbitrary attributes on
arbitrary objects. The workaround is to use a dict, indexed by the id
of the object you want to set arbitrary attributes on; this has the
helpful consequence
Duncan Booth wrote:
BTW, I don't know Ruby enough to understand the example at
http://lazaridis.com/case/lang/ruby/base.html:
class Object
def meta # adds variable meta to all objects in the system
end
I don't think this is valid Ruby code, by the way... It should probably
be
Alex Martelli wrote:
Duncan Booth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's a horrible suggestion (using id's, not the bit about separate
namespaces). If you use the id then attributes will persist beyond
the lifetime of the object and may suddenly reappear on other
unrelated objects later.
The
Alex Martelli wrote:
Ilias Lazaridis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...] - google stuff
http://lazaridis.com/case/lang/python.html#simple_variable_access
this leads to a new limitation:
#LIMITATION: large amount of repetitive code
One normally does not define large numbers of identical accessors
On Tue, 03 Jan 2006 08:27:39 -0800, Alex Martelli wrote:
Or some even more stringent qualification, such as the state's Bar exam
for lawyers -- you may not be able to sit for that exam w/o the
appropriate degree, but the degree by itself is not enough, you still
have to pass the exam. It is
Ilias Lazaridis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
One normally does not define large numbers of identical accessors (there
[...] - (extensive elaboration)
possibly one can provide the code for something similar to the ruby
attr_accessor:
class Talker
def sayHello
puts Hello
[much stuff deleted that I mostly agree with to get at an interesting
chunk of disagreement]
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Steven D'Aprano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
By contrast, today's professional bodies like law, medicine etc. have
independent standards of skill that must be met. I don't wish
Alex Martelli wrote:
Ilias Lazaridis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
note: Anton Vredegoor wrote:
only hire people with long backstabbing histories.
Such as...? Guido van Rossum? Greg Stein? Vint Cerf? Ben Goodger?
...
The employees you've mentioned should have most possibly the
Alex Martelli wrote:
Anton Vredegoor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Google's not a nice company (yeah, I know I'm posting from a google
account). If you look at their job requirements it's clear they will
only hire people with long backstabbing histories.
Such as...? Guido van Rossum?
Ilias Lazaridis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
... or equivalent (I do believe all I named have at least a Bachelor
degree, but with the undisputable results they've shown afterwards, I
think they'd all meet the or equivalent clause anyway).
* BS or MS in Computer Science or
Alex Martelli wrote:
Anton Vredegoor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
only hire people with long backstabbing histories.
Such as...? Guido van Rossum? Greg Stein? Vint Cerf? Ben Goodger?
...
No insider information is necessary, the job requirements make it
absolutely clear (at least
Anton Vredegoor wrote:
cut description of modern western society
Most people can survive (without damaging their souls so to speak) when
working for corruption themselves in this way, but sooner or later one
is asked to corrupt others (defending one's title during a promotion,
leading a
Anton Vredegoor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Google's not a nice company (yeah, I know I'm posting from a google
account). If you look at their job requirements it's clear they will
only hire people with long backstabbing histories.
Such as...? Guido van Rossum? Greg Stein? Vint Cerf?
Alex Martelli wrote:
Anton Vredegoor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Google's not a nice company (yeah, I know I'm posting from a google
account). If you look at their job requirements it's clear they will
only hire people with long backstabbing histories.
Such as...? Guido van Rossum?
Ilias Lazaridis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
only hire people with long backstabbing histories.
Such as...? Guido van Rossum? Greg Stein? Vint Cerf? Ben Goodger?
...
The employees you've mentioned should have most possibly the basic
google employment requirement: BS or MS... [1].
Martin P. Hellwig wrote:
[...] - (complex elaborations)
So the sum it up my unanswered question to you so far are:
- What is your definition of Efficiency
http://lazaridis.com/efficiency/definitions.html
(as stated on the website, any feedback is welcome. But please not
within this thread).
Martin P. Hellwig wrote:
Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
cut
The only thing that holds you theoretically back is acknowledged
authority by the participating group _and_ yourself and of course
the resource for restricted information.
what do you mean by resource for restricted information?
Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
cut
I'm suspecting that we have different definitions (or at least the
implications of that) of used terms.
I think it's important to first define these definition in a form
acceptable to both of us.
In the link you gave, the title was Efficiency Management.
Now I believe
Martin P. Hellwig wrote:
Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
cut
I'm suspecting that we have different definitions (or at least the
implications of that) of used terms.
I think it's important to first define these definition in a form
acceptable to both of us.
In the link you gave, the title was
Anton Vredegoor wrote:
Robert Kern wrote:
I have a friend who works at Google. He has no backstabbing history at all.
Stop
insulting my friends.
Your friends work for people who would never hire me. My resume sucks,
but I'm not a bad person or a mediocre programmer. They sold out.
For
Congratulations to Guide,
Mike
Harald Armin Massa wrote:
Guido at Google: a message in THE public forum c.l.p.
A confirmation by Martellibot, that Guido is IN FACT sitting 15m
distant from him; and everybody in Python knows where Martellibot has
his desk.
Can it get more official than
Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
Martin P. Hellwig wrote:
Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
cut
I'm suspecting that we have different definitions (or at least the
implications of that) of used terms.
I think it's important to first define these definition in a form
acceptable to both of us.
In the link you
Martin P. Hellwig wrote:
Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
Martin P. Hellwig wrote:
Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
cut
I'm suspecting that we have different definitions (or at least the
implications of that) of used terms.
I think it's important to first define these definition in a form
acceptable to both
John == John J Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John Guido may or may not realise it, but he seems to have been
John managing people (in some sense of 'managing', anyway) quite
John successfully over the past decade or so.
John John
Just you shush!
If he hears you, he'll return
Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
Martin P. Hellwig wrote:
Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
cut
So I guess you volunteer http://www.python.org/psf/volunteer.html ?
I volunteer and contribute already (with a general validity and python
specific analysis)
A mediator should communicate the findings and
Martin P. Hellwig wrote:
Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
Martin P. Hellwig wrote:
Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
cut
So I guess you volunteer http://www.python.org/psf/volunteer.html ?
I volunteer and contribute already (with a general validity and python
specific analysis)
A mediator should communicate
Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
cut
The only thing that holds you theoretically back is acknowledged
authority by the participating group _and_ yourself and of course the
resource for restricted information.
what do you mean by resource for restricted information?
Well, I mean that you should know
Michael wrote:
Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
[ panic, fear, worry ]
What's wrong with just saying Congratulations! ? First thing I thought was
ooh, maybe Guido will be able to work on P3K there - after all that would
benefit Google *and* everyone else :-)
Google's not a nice company (yeah, I
Anton Vredegoor wrote:
Michael wrote:
Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
[ panic, fear, worry ]
What's wrong with just saying Congratulations! ? First thing I thought was
ooh, maybe Guido will be able to work on P3K there - after all that would
benefit Google *and* everyone else :-)
Google's not a
Robert Kern wrote:
I have a friend who works at Google. He has no backstabbing history at all.
Stop
insulting my friends.
Your friends work for people who would never hire me. My resume sucks,
but I'm not a bad person or a mediocre programmer. They sold out.
For Software Engineer:
Anton Vredegoor wrote:
Google's not a nice company (yeah, I know I'm posting from a google
account). If you look at their job requirements it's clear they will
only hire people with long backstabbing histories. There seems to be no
room left for world improving undamaged souls in that
Anton Vredegoor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ok. That's a bit harder. I suppose we agree that if we have an
intelligent program that is more intelligent than a human and have this
program design an even more intelligent program than things start to
accelerate pretty fast?
There's your
Mike Meyer wrote:
We aren't any closer to having a real AI than we were in the 60s.
note that the name of the the poster who started this thread only needs minimal
adjustments to become an anagram for alien lizard AI, which might indicate
that
the government has access to some kind of AI, but
Anton Vredegoor wrote:
Robert Kern wrote:
I have a friend who works at Google. He has no backstabbing history at all.
Stop
insulting my friends.
Your friends work for people who would never hire me.
This is not a crime.
My resume sucks,
but I'm not a bad person or a mediocre programmer.
Robert Kern wrote:
PyPy will not bring about the Singularity.
But if it did, imagine how cool that would look on the developers
resumes... :-)
--
Hans Nowak
http://zephyrfalcon.org/
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Hans Robert Kern wrote:
PyPy will not bring about the Singularity.
Hans But if it did, imagine how cool that would look on the developers
Hans resumes... :-)
+1 QOTW
Skip
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Harald Armin Massa [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
Allow me to quote Greg Stein:
Ha! Guido would quit in a heartbeat if you tried to make him manage
people. That just isn't where he's at. He's absolutely brilliant and
loves to write excellent code. Great. We're gonna let him do just that
:-)
John Guido may or may not realise it, but he seems to have been
John managing people (in some sense of 'managing', anyway) quite
John successfully over the past decade or so.
Sssh! Don't tell him! Hopefully the PSU won't find out and
--
Guido at Google: a message in THE public forum c.l.p.
A confirmation by Martellibot, that Guido is IN FACT sitting 15m
distant from him; and everybody in Python knows where Martellibot has
his desk.
Can it get more official than this?
yeah:
a confirmation by Greg Stein @ Google within slashdot,
Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
cut
So I guess you volunteer http://www.python.org/psf/volunteer.html ?
--
mph
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
[ panic, fear, worry ]
What's wrong with just saying Congratulations! ? First thing I thought was
ooh, maybe Guido will be able to work on P3K there - after all that would
benefit Google *and* everyone else :-)
(Especially if he uses PyPy to experiment and play in ... :)
Michael wrote:
Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
[ panic, fear, worry ]
What's wrong with just saying Congratulations! ?
nothing.
But enouth people do this.
I am focusing on weaknesses threats:
http://lazaridis.com/efficiency/graph/analysis.html
First thing I thought was
ooh, maybe Guido will
Martin P. Hellwig wrote:
Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
cut
So I guess you volunteer http://www.python.org/psf/volunteer.html ?
I volunteer and contribute already (with a general validity and python
specific analysis)
A mediator should communicate the findings and suggestion (after
verifying them)
Harald Armin Massa wrote:
[...] - (comments)
Thank you for your comments.
-
TAG.python.evolution.negate.apotheosis
.
--
http://lazaridis.com
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
