Fredrik Lundh schrieb:
markscottwright wrote:
If it were that easy, the PyPy guys would be done by now.
if the PyPy guys had focused on writing a Python interpreter in Python,
they'd been done by now.
/F
The Python interpreter in Python part of PyPy _is_ done. Since quite
a while even
On 11/23/06, Scott David Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
markscottwright wrote:
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
markscottwright wrote:
If it were that easy, the PyPy guys would be done by now.
if the PyPy guys had focused on writing a Python interpreter in Python,
they'd been done by now.
Chris Mellon wrote;
Now, writing a compiler/interpreter from the ground up is a more
valuable experience, but does it really matter if the language is the
same one you wrote the compiler in? It gets harder the more
complicated the syntax and semantics of the language are, but, say,
python
markscottwright wrote:
If it were that easy, the PyPy guys would be done by now.
if the PyPy guys had focused on writing a Python interpreter in Python,
they'd been done by now.
/F
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
markscottwright wrote:
If it were that easy, the PyPy guys would be done by now.
if the PyPy guys had focused on writing a Python interpreter in Python,
they'd been done by now.
/F
Isn't that the point of PyPy? It's what their mission statement says
markscottwright wrote:
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
markscottwright wrote:
If it were that easy, the PyPy guys would be done by now.
if the PyPy guys had focused on writing a Python interpreter in Python,
they'd been done by now.
/F
Isn't that the point of PyPy? It's what their mission
While studying the SICP video lectures I have to twist my mind some to
completely understand the lessons. I implement the programs shown there
in both Python and Scheme, and I find the Python implementations
simpler to write (but it's not a fair comparison because I know very
little Scheme still).
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While studying the SICP video lectures I have to twist my mind some to
completely understand the lessons. I implement the programs shown there
in both Python and Scheme, and I find the Python implementations
simpler to write (but it's not a fair comparison because I
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
No surprise to anyone who's ever tried to use MIT Scheme.
Be careful, such assertions are often flamebait.
I am using DrPython (I think they were using it at MIT too lately), and
it is very very good IDE, it produces executables on the fly, it has a
visual debugger with some
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
No surprise to anyone who's ever tried to use MIT Scheme.
Be careful, such assertions are often flamebait.
Well, yeah, it's a warning to everyone to not
bother with the MIT implementation of Scheme which
is completely worthless.
I am using
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Haven't heard of that one, although I've got DrScheme.
Right, sorry, I meant that one :-)
I find that hierarchy extremely annoying. I don't see the need for it.
I never use OOP in Python yet there's no need for me to have a
stripped down version, I just don't use it.
But
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While studying the SICP video lectures I have to twist my mind some to
completely understand the lessons. I implement the programs shown there
in both Python and Scheme, and I find the Python implementations
simpler to write (but it's not a fair comparison because I
markscottwright:
I love Python as much as the next guy, but I
just don't see how SICP can be done in Python.
The contents of the course are probably different, they work on
robotics...
Bye,
bearophile
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While studying the SICP video lectures I have to twist my mind some to
completely understand the lessons. I implement the programs shown there
in both Python and Scheme, and I find the Python implementations
simpler to write (but it's not a fair comparison because I
Paddy wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While studying the SICP video lectures I have to twist my mind some to
completely understand the lessons. I implement the programs shown there
in both Python and Scheme, and I find the Python implementations
simpler to write (but it's not a fair
Paddy:
Is the MIT course syndicated to Universities around America or something?
(Is your name pronounced Beer-owe-file, or Bear-oh-fi-lee,
I don't know.
I too have heard about the MIT course changing to Python elsewhere and
wanted to know why it was talked about so much?
I don't know why
16 matches
Mail list logo
