On 17 Jul, 11:09, Fredrik Lundh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> (and the "stable release" and "much will change" stuff is pure FUD, of
> course. what competing project will I find if I google your name?)
That's a bit unfair. Maybe the guy was stung by previous experiences
with books and certain ot
Hallöchen!
Bruno Desthuilliers writes:
> Torsten Bronger a écrit :
>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>>
>>> On 16 juil, 10:35, Stefan Scholl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
Dave U. Random <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://snipr.com/PracticalDjango
June 2008 is a bit too earl
Torsten Bronger a écrit :
Hallöchen!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 16 juil, 10:35, Stefan Scholl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dave U. Random <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://snipr.com/PracticalDjango
June 2008 is a bit too early. Django isn't ready.
Oh, really ? Too bad. But, wait... If Dj
Fredrik Lundh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (and the "stable release" and "much will change" stuff is pure FUD, of
> course. what competing project will I find if I google your name?)
Found something? Maybe this could help me to choose a web
framework.
--
Web (en): http://www.no-spoon.de/ -*-
Hallöchen!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> On 16 juil, 10:35, Stefan Scholl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Dave U. Random <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> http://snipr.com/PracticalDjango
>>
>> June 2008 is a bit too early. Django isn't ready.
>
> Oh, really ? Too bad. But, wait... If Django isn't
On 16 juil, 10:35, Stefan Scholl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dave U. Random <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >http://snipr.com/PracticalDjango
>
> June 2008 is a bit too early. Django isn't ready.
Oh, really ? Too bad. But, wait... If Django isn't ready, what's that
framework I've been using for al
On Jul 17, 6:04 pm, Fredrik Lundh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Django's 0.91 release in early 1996
While I totally agree with position, I'm pretty sure you mean 2006
here :)
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Stefan Scholl wrote:
And by the way: The quote was changed by deleting something on
the same line:
"June 2008 is a bit too early. Django isn't ready."
vs.
"Django isn't ready."
Is this a language issue? That you meant to write "django 1.0 isn't
done" (as in
Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 05:41:11 +0200, Stefan Scholl wrote:
>> Fredrik Lundh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Stefan Scholl wrote:
>>>
Django isn't ready.
>>>
>>> That's a remarkably ignorant statement.
>>
>> The 1.0 release will be in Septem
Stefan Scholl wrote:
Django isn't ready.
That's a remarkably ignorant statement.
The 1.0 release will be in September.
So? "1.0" will be done then, yes. In what way does that mean that
Django itself isn't ready, in any sane sense of that word?
(For bystanders, Django's 0.91 release in
On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 05:41:11 +0200, Stefan Scholl wrote:
> Fredrik Lundh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Stefan Scholl wrote:
>>
>>> Django isn't ready.
>>
>> That's a remarkably ignorant statement.
>
> The 1.0 release will be in September.
So what? It's not the version number that matters but
Fredrik Lundh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stefan Scholl wrote:
>
>> Django isn't ready.
>
> That's a remarkably ignorant statement.
The 1.0 release will be in September.
--
Web (en): http://www.no-spoon.de/ -*- Web (de): http://www.frell.de/
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-
Stefan Scholl wrote:
Django isn't ready.
That's a remarkably ignorant statement.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Dave U. Random <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://snipr.com/PracticalDjango
June 2008 is a bit too early. Django isn't ready.
--
Web (en): http://www.no-spoon.de/ -*- Web (de): http://www.frell.de/
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
http://snipr.com/PracticalDjango
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
15 matches
Mail list logo
