Hi Rhodri...
You do realise that what id() returns is implementation-dependent, don't
you? In particular, what IronPython returns isn't an address.
I'm pretty sure I wrote standard Python install in one of my replies.
Yeah here it is in a reply to Miki...
Hmm, I was hoping to stay inside
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 4:21 PM, wisecrac...@tesco.net wrote:
Hi Rhodri...
You do realise that what id() returns is implementation-dependent, don't
you? In particular, what IronPython returns isn't an address.
I'm pretty sure I wrote standard Python install in one of my replies.
Yeah
On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 07:21:18 +0100, wisecracker wrote:
Hi Rhodri...
You do realise that what id() returns is implementation-dependent,
don't you? In particular, what IronPython returns isn't an address.
I'm pretty sure I wrote standard Python install in one of my replies.
IronPython
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
I'm pretty sure I wrote standard Python install in one of my replies.
IronPython*is* standard Python. As are Jython, PyPy and CPython.
This brings up a question I have had for a while; when is PSF going
to forward PythonX on over to a formal standards committee
Hi Chris...
It sounds to me like you're trying to pull off a classic buffer
overrun and remote code execution exploit, in someone else's Python
program. And all I have to say is Good luck to you.
Talking of nefarious usage...
I wonder what this would do left unchecked on a current
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 7:53 PM, wisecrac...@tesco.net wrote:
Talking of nefarious usage...
I wonder what this would do left unchecked on a current machine and current
Python install...
###
global somestring
somestring =
while 1:
#print somestring
somestring =
On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 10:53:00 +0100, wisecracker wrote:
global somestring
somestring =
You don't need to declare a name in the global scope as global. It just
is global.
--
Steven
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 2011-04-18, harrismh777 harrismh...@charter.net wrote:
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
I'm pretty sure I wrote standard Python install in one of my replies.
IronPython*is* standard Python. As are Jython, PyPy and CPython.
This brings up a question I have had for a while; when is PSF going
On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 08:01:00 +0100, wisecrac...@tesco.net wrote:
Hi Rhodri...
You do realise that what id() returns is implementation-dependent, don't
you? In particular, what IronPython returns isn't an address.
I'm pretty sure I wrote standard Python install in one of my replies.
Yeah
Hi coders...
Before I start I don`t expect an easy answer
except No it can`t be done!.
I have not tried it yet, I`m only asking for opinions ATM.
(Except on the classic AMIGA and it DOES work for that!)
I only want it to work in Linux/?IX. Windblows does
not interest me at all.
OK here we
If I wrote an Assembly(/Assembler) routine to call
this binary code using say the JMP instruction or
using PUSH absolute value and RET, and, call these
Jump using:-
os.system(/full//path/to/Jump address_of_binary_in_ascii)
This is calling a different *program* outside of the current
On Sun, 17 Apr 2011 13:15:01 +0100, wisecracker wrote:
OK here we go...
I can easily place a machine code, PURE binary, routine into Python.
What do you mean by into Python? Do you mean patching the Python
compiler? Injecting code into the runtime interpreter? Storing a bunch of
bytes in
Hi Miki...
os.system(/full//path/to/Jump address_of_binary_in_ascii)
This is calling a different *program* outside of the current Python process.
I don't think
it'll do what you want (different memory segments).
That is what I assumed, that an os.system() call would run in a subshell.
On Apr 17, 2:15 pm, wisecrac...@tesco.net wrote:
I can also find out where it is EXACTLY just as
easily so this is not my problem.
The problem is calling it!
You'll need to mmap or valloc a page-alligned memory
buffer (for which the size must be a multiple of the system
page size), and call
Hello Steven...
I read the whole of your post first and you come across one abrasive character.
I can easily place a machine code, PURE binary, routine into Python.
What do you mean by into Python? Do you mean patching the Python
compiler? Injecting code into the runtime interpreter?
No and
Hi Sturla...
You'll need to mmap or valloc a page-alligned memory
buffer (for which the size must be a multiple of the system
page size), and call mprotect to make it executable.
Copy your binary code into this buffer. Then you will
need to do some magic with ctypes, Cython or C to call
it;
It sounds to me like you're trying to pull off a classic buffer
overrun and remote code execution exploit, in someone else's Python
program. And all I have to say is Good luck to you.
ChrisA
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Apr 17, 9:37 pm, wisecrac...@tesco.net wrote:
Hi Sturla...
You'll need to mmap or valloc a page-alligned memory
buffer (for which the size must be a multiple of the system
page size), and call mprotect to make it executable.
Copy your binary code into this buffer. Then you will
need
On Apr 17, 7:25 pm, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
It sounds to me like you're trying to pull off a classic buffer
overrun and remote code execution exploit, in someone else's Python
program. And all I have to say is Good luck to you.
He might. But this also has reputable use,
On Sun, 17 Apr 2011 10:30:01 -0700, rusi wrote:
[...]
If you make it work (and prove Steve wrong :-) ) please post your how/
what/where here --
I'm always happy to be proven wrong. If I was right all the time, that
would mean I'd run out of things to learn, and where's the fun in that?
--
Hi Chris...
It sounds to me like you're trying to pull off a classic buffer
overrun and remote code execution exploit, in someone else's Python
program. And all I have to say is Good luck to you.
No, not even remotely close... ;o)
Note that the idea works on an AMIGA without an MMU. The
Hi Sturla...
He might. But this also has reputable use, such as implementing
a JIT compiler. E.g. this is what Psyco and PyPy does.
I`ll contact you privately...
Gimme a bit of time to type a monologue... ;o)
--
73...
Bazza, G0LCU...
Team AMIGA...
http://homepages.tesco.net/wisecracker/
On Sun, 17 Apr 2011 17:17:02 +0100, wisecrac...@tesco.net wrote:
I`ll give you a clue... id(some_object) is close enough but NOT that
close.
You do realise that what id() returns is implementation-dependent, don't
you? In particular, what IronPython returns isn't an address.
--
Rhodri
23 matches
Mail list logo
