We have built Radbox.me on web2py and it's amazing..
On Saturday, December 19, 2009 1:42 AM AppRe Godeck wrote:
Just curious if anybody prefers web2py over django, and visa versa. I
know it is been discussed on a flame war level a lot. I am looking for a
more intellectual reasoning behind
Some may find useful to compare:
- A Crash Course on Django
http://articles.sitepoint.com/article/django-crash-course
- A Crash Course on Web2py
http://www.web2py.com/AlterEgo/default/show/253
They basically describe the same app and the steps to built it. Sorry
I had not time to make
AppRe Godeck a écrit :
(snip)
Thanks for your replies, I was hoping to hear from some django people as
well. Especially if you choose django over web2py, and why.
I don't know what a django people is - but if you mean django core
developper, I'm not one of them. Now wrt while I use Django
Thadeus Burgess a écrit :
(snip)
Spend one
day working on a simple django application, polls, blog, image
gallery, family pet tree, you name it. Then take the next day, and
write the same application with web2py, and you decide. In the end,
both are tools and you need to figure out what is best
On Dec 20, 1:35 am, mdipierro massimodipierr...@gmail.com wrote:
Errata. I said The dal supports transactions where I meant the dal
supports migrations.
Of course it also supports transactions as well as distributed
transactions.
Sorry, if this is not related to this topic.
Does web2py
mdipierro a écrit :
On Dec 19, 12:42 am, AppRe Godeck a...@godeck.com wrote:
Just curious if anybody prefers web2py over django, and visa versa. I
know it's been discussed on a flame war level a lot. I am looking for a
more intellectual reasoning behind using one or the other.
Of course I am
Anand Vaidya a écrit :
On Dec 19, 2:42 pm, AppRe Godeck a...@godeck.com wrote:
Just curious if anybody prefers web2py over django, and visa versa. I
know it's been discussed on a flame war level a lot. I am looking for a
more intellectual reasoning behind using one or the other.
Hi,
I am not
On Dec 19, 12:42 am, AppRe Godeck a...@godeck.com wrote:
Just curious if anybody prefers web2py over django, and visa versa. I
know it's been discussed on a flame war level a lot. I am looking for a
more intellectual reasoning behind using one or the other.
Of course I am the most
On Dec 19, 8:39 pm, AppRe Godeck a...@godeck.com wrote:
On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 12:48:07 -0800, Yarko wrote:
On Dec 19, 12:42 am, AppRe Godeck a...@godeck.com wrote:
It seems that this is the biggest issue surrounding web2py, from my
research, is the ability to customize the defaults (the
On Dec 21, 2:32 am, Bruno Desthuilliers bruno.
42.desthuilli...@websiteburo.invalid wrote:
Thadeus Burgess a écrit :
(snip)
Spend one
day working on a simple django application, polls, blog, image
gallery, family pet tree, you name it. Then take the next day, and
write the same
On Dec 21, 2:50 am, Bruno Desthuilliers bruno.
42.desthuilli...@websiteburo.invalid wrote:
mdipierro a écrit :
...
This means you do not need to import
basic web2py symbols. They are already defined in the environment that
executes the models and controllers
Ok. As far as I'm concerned :
The concept of distributed transaction does not make sense on GAE
because there is only one datastore.
It supports regular transactions on GAE to the extent that GAE
supports them but you have to use the GAE run_in_transaction API
explictely.
It does support distributed transactions with
If all
web2py offers is default views, then it may be good for proof of concept
projects, however I can't see in my right mind, proofing an application,
and then turning around to write it in django because more than the
defaults is needed.
You *can* customize web2py views ...
Why does
People seem to think that because web2py has a default for almost
everything (part of its design) than you must use the default.
- There is a web based IDE but you *can* use the shell instead (like
you do in Django)
- There are migrations but you *can* disable then (and it works like
Django that
On Dec 19, 12:42 am, AppRe Godeck a...@godeck.com wrote:
Just curious if anybody prefers web2py over django, and visa versa. I
know it's been discussed on a flame war level a lot. I am looking for a
more intellectual reasoning behind using one or the other.
Chevy or Ford? (or whatever pair
On Dec 19, 2:48 pm, Yarko yark...@gmail.com wrote:
On Dec 19, 12:42 am, AppRe Godeck a...@godeck.com wrote:
Just curious if anybody prefers web2py over django, and visa versa. I
know it's been discussed on a flame war level a lot. I am looking for a
more intellectual reasoning behind using
On Dec 19, 12:42 am, AppRe Godeck a...@godeck.com wrote:
Just curious if anybody prefers web2py over django, and visa versa. I
know it's been discussed on a flame war level a lot. I am looking for a
more intellectual reasoning behind using one or the other.
Of course I am the most biased
Errata. I said The dal supports transactions where I meant the dal
supports migrations.
Of course it also supports transactions as well as distributed
transactions.
On Dec 19, 5:32 pm, mdipierro massimodipierr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Dec 19, 12:42 am, AppRe Godeck a...@godeck.com wrote:
Just
On Dec 19, 1:42 am, AppRe Godeck a...@godeck.com wrote:
Just curious if anybody prefers web2py over django, and visa versa. I
know it's been discussed on a flame war level a lot. I am looking for a
more intellectual reasoning behind using one or the other.
Hi! I come from a mvc framework
Errata 2. Before people jump on me. I said copyright but I meant
trademark. Of course web2py is GPL2 so everybody can copy and modify
it.
The license has an exception that basically treats the compiled web2py
as freeware.
The license does not extend to apps that require web2py. They can be
On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 12:48:07 -0800, Yarko wrote:
On Dec 19, 12:42 am, AppRe Godeck a...@godeck.com wrote:
Just curious if anybody prefers web2py over django, and visa versa. I
know it's been discussed on a flame war level a lot. I am looking for a
more intellectual reasoning behind using one
Why does web2py have classes that represent HTML? I can't see ever
needing to write VIEW code in my controller, since thats what views are
for.
You do not need to use but if, for example, you want to build a menu
recursively, having a server-side presentation of the DOM allows to do
it without
On Dec 19, 8:39 pm, AppRe Godeck a...@godeck.com wrote:
On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 12:48:07 -0800, Yarko wrote:
On Dec 19, 12:42 am, AppRe Godeck a...@godeck.com wrote:
Just curious if anybody prefers web2py over django, and visa versa. I
know it's been discussed on a flame war level a lot. I am
On Dec 19, 2:42 pm, AppRe Godeck a...@godeck.com wrote:
Just curious if anybody prefers web2py over django, and visa versa. I
know it's been discussed on a flame war level a lot. I am looking for a
more intellectual reasoning behind using one or the other.
Hi,
I am not very familiar with
Just curious if anybody prefers web2py over django, and visa versa. I
know it's been discussed on a flame war level a lot. I am looking for a
more intellectual reasoning behind using one or the other.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
25 matches
Mail list logo
