In message i2gujh$sl...@news.eternal-september.org, francogrex wrote:
By the way Peter Norvig is not biased, he works for Google research and is
a supporter of programming in any language, especially in Python.
Bias doesn’t have to be a conscious thing.
--
On 07/25/2010 11:02 AM, francogrex wrote:
Terry Reedy wrote:
As other have said, mostly, but I would change the following...
Thanks for all those who replied. I know these are not all the features but
some of them and again this is not a comparison but a little taste of what
python offers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/26/2010 11:58 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
In message i2gujh$sl...@news.eternal-september.org, francogrex wrote:
By the way Peter Norvig is not biased, he works for Google research and is
a supporter of programming in any language,
Terry Reedy wrote:
As other have said, mostly, but I would change the following...
Thanks for all those who replied. I know these are not all the features but
some of them and again this is not a comparison but a little taste of what
python offers today, and the replies were very informative.
Hi, I'm not a Python programmer but I'm
interested in it and I found this table from
Norvig that dates for some years (I re-posted
it temporarily on my site below to take it out
of context a little). I'm not interested in
any comparisons only in the Python features (
last column), can someone
On Sat, 24 Jul 2010 14:45:52 +0200, francogrex wrote:
Hi, I'm not a Python programmer but I'm interested in it and I found
this table from Norvig that dates for some years (I re-posted it
temporarily on my site below to take it out of context a little). I'm
not interested in any comparisons
francogrex wrote:
Hi, I'm not a Python programmer but I'm
interested in it and I found this table from
Norvig that dates for some years (I re-posted
it temporarily on my site below to take it out
of context a little). I'm not interested in
any comparisons only in the Python features (
last
On 07/24/2010 02:45 PM, francogrex wrote:
Hi, I'm not a Python programmer but I'm
interested in it and I found this table from
Norvig that dates for some years (I re-posted
it temporarily on my site below to take it out
of context a little). I'm not interested in
any comparisons only in
On 24 Jul 2010, at 23:19, Thomas Jollans wrote:
Support heterogeneous lists == Yes (array)
This is nonsense, and has always been.
Python lists (not arrays) have always been heterogeneous. They store
objects and don't care about the type. Python arrays (from the array
module) are homogeneous,
Thomas Jollans wrote:
Support heterogeneous lists == Yes (array)
This is nonsense, and has always been.
I think you are misunderstanding that statement. Python's list stores its
items in a continuous chunk of memory, a layout that is called array in
common CS terminology as opposed to
On 07/24/2010 03:48 PM, Brian Quinlan wrote:
On 24 Jul 2010, at 23:19, Thomas Jollans wrote:
Support heterogeneous lists == Yes (array)
This is nonsense, and has always been.
Python lists (not arrays) have always been heterogeneous. They store
objects and don't care about the type. Python
On 7/24/2010 8:45 AM, francogrex wrote:
Hi, I'm not a Python programmer but I'm
interested in it and I found this table from
Norvig that dates for some years (I re-posted
it temporarily on my site below to take it out
of context a little). I'm not interested in
any comparisons only in the Python
12 matches
Mail list logo
