On Sun, 03 Jul 2005 11:47:07 +1000, Steven D'Aprano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 01 Jul 2005 12:59:20 -0400, François Pinard wrote:
[Peter Hansen]
Mike Meyer wrote:
Yes. I once grabbed an old program that did assignments to None. But
that's always been a bad idea.
What was the use
On Sun, 03 Jul 2005 19:19:05 +, Bengt Richter wrote:
On Sun, 03 Jul 2005 11:47:07 +1000, Steven D'Aprano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 01 Jul 2005 12:59:20 -0400, François Pinard wrote:
[Peter Hansen]
Mike Meyer wrote:
Yes. I once grabbed an old program that did assignments to
On Mon, 04 Jul 2005 09:11:19 +1000, Steven D'Aprano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 03 Jul 2005 19:19:05 +, Bengt Richter wrote:
On Sun, 03 Jul 2005 11:47:07 +1000, Steven D'Aprano [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Fri, 01 Jul 2005 12:59:20 -0400, François Pinard wrote:
[Peter Hansen]
On Fri, 01 Jul 2005 12:59:20 -0400, François Pinard wrote:
[Peter Hansen]
Mike Meyer wrote:
Yes. I once grabbed an old program that did assignments to None. But
that's always been a bad idea.
What was the use case!?
People used to assign None to itself as a keyword argument in
[Peter Hansen]
Mike Meyer wrote:
Yes. I once grabbed an old program that did assignments to None. But
that's always been a bad idea.
What was the use case!?
People used to assign None to itself as a keyword argument in function
headers. The goal was to make a local copy of the reference,
