On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:35:01 -, venutaurus...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mar 11, 7:20 pm, Tim Golden wrote:
venutaurus...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hello all,
> I got a suspicion on the behaviour of os.rename
> (src,dst).If the src is the path of a file and dst is a new filena
On Mar 11, 7:27 pm, Emile van Sebille wrote:
> venutaurus...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Hello all,
> > I got a suspicion on the behaviour of os.rename
> > (src,dst).If the src is the path of a file and dst is a new filename
> > this os.rename() function is infa
On Mar 11, 7:20 pm, Tim Golden wrote:
> venutaurus...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Hello all,
> > I got a suspicion on the behaviour of os.rename
> > (src,dst).If the src is the path of a file and dst is a new filename
> > this os.rename() function is infact creat
venutaurus...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello all,
I got a suspicion on the behaviour of os.rename
(src,dst).If the src is the path of a file and dst is a new filename
this os.rename() function is infact creating a new file with the dst
name in the current working directory and leaving the
venutaurus...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello all,
I got a suspicion on the behaviour of os.rename
(src,dst).If the src is the path of a file and dst is a new filename
this os.rename() function is infact creating a new file with the dst
name in the current working directory and leaving the
Hello all,
I got a suspicion on the behaviour of os.rename
(src,dst).If the src is the path of a file and dst is a new filename
this os.rename() function is infact creating a new file with the dst
name in the current working directory and leaving the src as it is. Is
this the expected
