On 2020-07-07, Stephen Rosen wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 6:37 AM Adam Funk wrote:
>
>> Is there a "bulletproof" version of json.dump somewhere that will
>> convert bytes to str, any other iterables to list, etc., so you can
>> just get your data into a file & keep working?
>>
>
> Is the data
Try jsonlight.dumps it'll just work.
Le mar. 7 juil. 2020 à 12:53, Adam Funk a écrit :
> On 2020-07-06, Adam Funk wrote:
>
> > On 2020-07-06, Chris Angelico wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 10:11 PM Jon Ribbens via Python-list
> >> wrote:
>
> >>> While I agree entirely with your point, there
On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 6:37 AM Adam Funk wrote:
> Is there a "bulletproof" version of json.dump somewhere that will
> convert bytes to str, any other iterables to list, etc., so you can
> just get your data into a file & keep working?
>
Is the data only being read by python programs? If so,
On 2020-07-06, Adam Funk wrote:
> On 2020-07-06, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 10:11 PM Jon Ribbens via Python-list
>> wrote:
>>> While I agree entirely with your point, there is however perhaps room
>>> for a bit more helpfulness from the json module. There is no sensible
>>>
You can achieve round-tripping by maintaining a type mapping in code, for a
single datatype it would look like:
newloads(datetime, newdumps(datetime.now())
If those would rely on __dump__ and __load__ functions in the fashion of
pickle then nested data structures would also be easy:
@dataclass
On 2020-07-06, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 12:01 AM Jon Ribbens via Python-list
> wrote:
>> I think what you're saying is, if we do:
>>
>> json1 = json.dumps(foo)
>> json2 = json.dumps(json.loads(json1))
>> assert json1 == json2
>>
>> the assertion should never fail
On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 12:01 AM Jon Ribbens via Python-list
wrote:
>
> On 2020-07-06, Chris Angelico wrote:
> > I think that even in non-strict mode, round-tripping should be
> > achieved after one iteration. That is to say, anything you can
> > JSON-encode will JSON-decode to something that
On 2020-07-06, Chris Angelico wrote:
> I think that even in non-strict mode, round-tripping should be
> achieved after one iteration. That is to say, anything you can
> JSON-encode will JSON-decode to something that would create the same
> encoded form. Not sure if there's anything that would
On 2020-07-06, Frank Millman wrote:
> On 2020-07-06 3:08 PM, Jon Ribbens via Python-list wrote:
>> On 2020-07-06, Frank Millman wrote:
>>> On 2020-07-06 2:06 PM, Jon Ribbens via Python-list wrote:
While I agree entirely with your point, there is however perhaps room
for a bit more
On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 11:39 PM Adam Funk wrote:
>
> Aha, I think the default=repr option is probably just what I need;
> maybe (at least in the testing stages) something like this:
>
> try:
> with open(output_file, 'w') as f:
> json.dump(f)
> except TypeError:
> print('unexpected
On 2020-07-06, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 10:11 PM Jon Ribbens via Python-list
> wrote:
>>
>> On 2020-07-06, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> > On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 8:36 PM Adam Funk wrote:
>> >> Is there a "bulletproof" version of json.dump somewhere that will
>> >> convert bytes
On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 11:31 PM Jon Ribbens via Python-list
wrote:
>
> On 2020-07-06, Chris Angelico wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 11:06 PM Jon Ribbens via Python-list
> > wrote:
> >> The 'json' module already fails to provide round-trip functionality:
> >>
> >> >>> for data in ({True:
On 2020-07-06, Frank Millman wrote:
> On 2020-07-06 2:06 PM, Jon Ribbens via Python-list wrote:
>> On 2020-07-06, Chris Angelico wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 8:36 PM Adam Funk wrote:
Is there a "bulletproof" version of json.dump somewhere that will
convert bytes to str, any other
On 2020-07-06, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 8:36 PM Adam Funk wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have a program that does a lot of work with URLs and requests,
>> collecting data over about an hour, & then writing the collated data
>> to a JSON file. The first time I ran it, the
On 2020-07-06 3:08 PM, Jon Ribbens via Python-list wrote:
On 2020-07-06, Frank Millman wrote:
On 2020-07-06 2:06 PM, Jon Ribbens via Python-list wrote:
While I agree entirely with your point, there is however perhaps room
for a bit more helpfulness from the json module. There is no sensible
On 2020-07-06, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 11:06 PM Jon Ribbens via Python-list
> wrote:
>> The 'json' module already fails to provide round-trip functionality:
>>
>> >>> for data in ({True: 1}, {1: 2}, (1, 2)):
>> ... if json.loads(json.dumps(data)) != data:
>>
On 2020-07-06, J. Pic wrote:
> Well I made a suggestion on python-ideas and a PyPi lib came out of it, but
> since you can't patch a lot of internal types it's not so useful.
>
> Feel free to try it out:
>
> https://yourlabs.io/oss/jsonlight/
While I applaud your experimentation, that is not
On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 11:06 PM Jon Ribbens via Python-list
wrote:
>
> On 2020-07-06, Chris Angelico wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 10:11 PM Jon Ribbens via Python-list
> > wrote:
> >> While I agree entirely with your point, there is however perhaps room
> >> for a bit more helpfulness from
On 2020-07-06, Frank Millman wrote:
> On 2020-07-06 2:06 PM, Jon Ribbens via Python-list wrote:
>> While I agree entirely with your point, there is however perhaps room
>> for a bit more helpfulness from the json module. There is no sensible
>> reason I can think of that it refuses to serialize
On 2020-07-06, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 10:11 PM Jon Ribbens via Python-list
> wrote:
>> While I agree entirely with your point, there is however perhaps room
>> for a bit more helpfulness from the json module. There is no sensible
>> reason I can think of that it refuses to
Well I made a suggestion on python-ideas and a PyPi lib came out of it, but
since you can't patch a lot of internal types it's not so useful.
Feel free to try it out:
https://yourlabs.io/oss/jsonlight/
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 2020-07-06 2:06 PM, Jon Ribbens via Python-list wrote:
On 2020-07-06, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 8:36 PM Adam Funk wrote:
Is there a "bulletproof" version of json.dump somewhere that will
convert bytes to str, any other iterables to list, etc., so you can
just get your
On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 10:11 PM Jon Ribbens via Python-list
wrote:
>
> On 2020-07-06, Chris Angelico wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 8:36 PM Adam Funk wrote:
> >> Is there a "bulletproof" version of json.dump somewhere that will
> >> convert bytes to str, any other iterables to list, etc., so
On 2020-07-06, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 8:36 PM Adam Funk wrote:
>> Is there a "bulletproof" version of json.dump somewhere that will
>> convert bytes to str, any other iterables to list, etc., so you can
>> just get your data into a file & keep working?
>
> That's the PHP
On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 8:36 PM Adam Funk wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a program that does a lot of work with URLs and requests,
> collecting data over about an hour, & then writing the collated data
> to a JSON file. The first time I ran it, the json.dump failed because
> there was a bytes value
Hi,
I have a program that does a lot of work with URLs and requests,
collecting data over about an hour, & then writing the collated data
to a JSON file. The first time I ran it, the json.dump failed because
there was a bytes value instead of a str, so I had to figure out where
that was coming
26 matches
Mail list logo
