On Feb 14, 11:35 am, Cameron Simpson c...@zip.com.au wrote:
On 13Feb2011 14:47, rantingrick rantingr...@gmail.com wrote:
| On Feb 13, 4:30 pm, Steven D'Aprano steve|
+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote:
| The official stance of the Python development team is that 2.7 and 3.x
| will
We need to start demanding that folks move towards 3.0 compliance with
their tutorials. Most of the functionality in Python3000 is available
from the __future__ module, especially in Python2.6 and up. There is
no reason to continue supporting deprecated tutorials. If someone is
still using an
PS:
--
Open Invitation:
--
I am more than willing to help out those who need to bring Python2.x
tutorials into 3.x compliance (and i invite others to get involved!).
I would prefer to convert all to 3.x tutorials and not engage in
monkey patching by annotating
Hahaha. You've got a new one every week, don't you. What happened to the
demand to evolve idol into the future or whatever the BS you were
parroting was? So we're on TKInter being fixed/replaced, (which you
haven't worked with the steps people gave you), Idol being forked and
redone, (again
At 01:18 PM 2/13/2011, rantingrick wrote:
If any tutorial owners refuse to cooperate we need to remove their
tutorials (and/or links to their tutorials) from the official Python
website forever.
How many tutorials have you written?
In a city I used to live in, a long while ago, ...
You
On Feb 13, 3:03 pm, Thomas L. Shinnick tshin...@io.com wrote:
In a city I used to live in, a long while ago, ...
You would stop at a red light at a downtown corner and some unkempt
fellow would lurch out of nowhere, stagger onto your hood, smear his
dirty rag over a part of your windshield
However *we* are going to move forward with or
without you.
In other words: We in RR's book means RR and this silent majority that
has pitched in so much work to back his last call to move forward, that
we're now boggling in awe at a new Idol. And moving forward means
posting lots of trash,
On Sun, 13 Feb 2011 15:03:18 -0600, Thomas L. Shinnick wrote:
At 01:18 PM 2/13/2011, rantingrick wrote:
If any tutorial owners refuse to cooperate we need to remove their
tutorials (and/or links to their tutorials) from the official Python
website forever.
How many tutorials have you written?
On Feb 13, 4:30 pm, Steven D'Aprano steve
+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote:
The official stance of the Python development team is that 2.7 and 3.x
will co-exist for a long, long time. Removing 2.x tutorials would be
cutting off our nose to spite our face.
That is BS Steven and you know
On 13Feb2011 14:47, rantingrick rantingr...@gmail.com wrote:
| On Feb 13, 4:30 pm, Steven D'Aprano steve
| +comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote:
| The official stance of the Python development team is that 2.7 and 3.x
| will co-exist for a long, long time. Removing 2.x tutorials would be
|
10 matches
Mail list logo
