Re: Categorising strings on meaningful–meaningless spectrum (was: Catogorising strings into random versus non-random)

2015-12-21 Thread Steven D'Aprano
On Monday 21 December 2015 14:45, Ben Finney wrote: > Steven D'Aprano writes: > >> Let's call the second group "random" and the first "non-random", >> without getting bogged down into arguments about whether they are >> really random or not. > > I think we should discuss

Categorising strings on meaningful–meaningless spectrum (was: Catogorising strings into random versus non-random)

2015-12-20 Thread Ben Finney
Steven D'Aprano writes: > Let's call the second group "random" and the first "non-random", > without getting bogged down into arguments about whether they are > really random or not. I think we should discuss it, even at risk of getting bogged down. As you know better than