Alex Martelli schrieb:
>
> Why, thanks for the pointer -- I'm particularly proud of having written
> """
> The only really workable way to develop large software projects, just as
> the only really workable way to run a large business, is a state of
> controlled chaos.
> """
Yes, indeed a good sa
Gregor Horvath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alexander Eisenhuth schrieb:
> >
> > I'm wodering how the information hiding in python is ment. As I
> > understand there doesn't exist public / protected / private mechanism,
> > but a '_' and '__' naming convention.
> >
> > As I figured out there
Alexander Eisenhuth a écrit :
> Bruno Desthuilliers schrieb:
>
>> Nope. It's either 'interface' (no leading underscore),
>> 'implementation' (single leading underscore), 'implementation with
>> some protection against accidental overriding' (two leading underscores).
>
> What do you mean with
On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 15:17:06 +0200, Alexander Eisenhuth wrote:
> Bruno Desthuilliers schrieb:
>
>> Nope. It's either 'interface' (no leading underscore), 'implementation'
>> (single leading underscore), 'implementation with some protection
>> against accidental overriding' (two leading undersc
On 9/7/07, Alexander Eisenhuth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Bruno Desthuilliers schrieb:
>
> > Nope. It's either 'interface' (no leading underscore), 'implementation'
> > (single leading underscore), 'implementation with some protection
> > against accidental overriding' (two leading underscores
Bruno Desthuilliers schrieb:
> Nope. It's either 'interface' (no leading underscore), 'implementation'
> (single leading underscore), 'implementation with some protection
> against accidental overriding' (two leading underscores).
What do you mean with 'implementation'? What does it express?
-
Alexander Eisenhuth schrieb:
>
> I'm wodering how the information hiding in python is ment. As I
> understand there doesn't exist public / protected / private mechanism,
> but a '_' and '__' naming convention.
>
> As I figured out there is only public and private possible as speakin in
> "C+
Alexander Eisenhuth a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> I'm wodering how the information hiding in python is ment.
Conventions...
> As I
> understand there doesn't exist public / protected / private mechanism,
> but a '_' and '__' naming convention.
Yes.
> As I figured out there is only public and pr
On 9/7/07, Alexander Eisenhuth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'm wodering how the information hiding in python is ment. As I understand
> there
> doesn't exist public / protected / private mechanism, but a '_' and
> '__'
> naming convention.
>
> As I figured out there is only public
Alexander Eisenhuth wrote:
> As I figured out there is only public and private possible as speakin in
> "C++ manner". Are you all happy with it. What does "the zen of python"
> say to that design? (protected is useless?)
>
Ask it yourself:
>>> import this
>
> class A:
> def __init__(sel
Hi all,
I'm wodering how the information hiding in python is ment. As I understand
there
doesn't exist public / protected / private mechanism, but a '_' and '__'
naming convention.
As I figured out there is only public and private possible as speakin in "C++
manner". Are you all happy with
11 matches
Mail list logo
