Rocco Moretti wrote:
Peter Hansen wrote:
The main script is generally not compiled, but all imported
scripts are generally compiled automatically, the first time
they are imported, and never again unless the source changes.
Someone please correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm under the impression
that
Peter Hansen wrote:
The main script is generally not compiled, but all imported
scripts are generally compiled automatically, the first time
they are imported, and never again unless the source changes.
Someone please correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm under the impression
that the main script *is*
LutherRevisited wrote:
This may be a dumb question, but are there any practical advantages of
compiling a python application to *.pyo, or *.pyc? I haven't noticed any
difference in the performance of text *.py or a bytecompiled file.
The main script is generally not compiled, but all imported
scri
LutherRevisited wrote:
This may be a dumb question, but are there any practical advantages of
compiling a python application to *.pyo, or *.pyc? I haven't noticed any
difference in the performance of text *.py or a bytecompiled file.
For a large application, the startup cost may be noticable, as i
Dnia 29 Dec 2004 23:57:14 GMT, LutherRevisited napisał(a):
> I haven't noticed any difference in the performance of text *.py
> or a bytecompiled file.
Importing modules works faster.
--
JZ ICQ:6712522
http://zabiello.com
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
This may be a dumb question, but are there any practical advantages of
compiling a python application to *.pyo, or *.pyc? I haven't noticed any
difference in the performance of text *.py or a bytecompiled file.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
