>
> https://bitbucket.org/cameron_simpson/css/src/374f650025f156554a986fb3fd472003d2a2519a/lib/python/cs/fileutils.py?at=default#cl-408
>
> That looks like it will do the trick for me, thank you Cameron.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Dave Angel wrote:
> On 07/11/2013 12:57 AM, Jason Friedman wrote:
>> Other than using a database, what are my options for allowing two processes
>> to edit the same file at the same time? When I say same time, I can accept
>> delays. I considered lock files, but I cannot conceive of how I avoid
On Wed, 10 Jul 2013 22:57:09 -0600, Jason Friedman wrote:
> Other than using a database, what are my options for allowing two processes
> to edit the same file at the same time? When I say same time, I can accept
> delays.
What do you mean by "edit"? Overwriting bytes and appending bytes are
sim
On 10Jul2013 22:57, Jason Friedman wrote:
| Other than using a database, what are my options for allowing two processes
| to edit the same file at the same time? When I say same time, I can accept
| delays. I considered lock files, but I cannot conceive of how I avoid race
| conditions.
Sure. (
On 07/11/2013 12:57 AM, Jason Friedman wrote:
Other than using a database, what are my options for allowing two processes
to edit the same file at the same time? When I say same time, I can accept
delays. I considered lock files, but I cannot conceive of how I avoid race
conditions.
In gener
Other than using a database, what are my options for allowing two processes
to edit the same file at the same time? When I say same time, I can accept
delays. I considered lock files, but I cannot conceive of how I avoid race
conditions.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
