On Monday, March 2, 2020 at 3:12:33 PM UTC-6, Marco Sulla wrote:
> Is your project published somewhere? What changes have you done to the
> interpreter?
I'm writing my own mess:
https://github.com/rockobonaparte/cloaca
It's a .NET Pythonish interpreter with the distinction of using a whole lot of
On Monday, March 2, 2020 at 7:09:24 AM UTC-6, Lele Gaifax wrote:
> Yes, you just used it, although you may have confused its meaning:
>
Yeah I absolutely got it backwards. That's a fun one I have to fix in my
project now!
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Fri, 28 Feb 2020 at 08:28, Adam Preble wrote:
>
> I have been making some progress on my custom interpreter project
Is your project published somewhere? What changes have you done to the
interpreter?
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Adam Preble writes:
> On Sunday, March 1, 2020 at 3:08:29 PM UTC-6, Terry Reedy wrote:
>
>> Because BaseClass is the superclass of SubClass.
>
> So there's a mechanism for parent classes to know all their children?
Yes, you just used it, although you may have confused its meaning:
>>> class
On Sunday, March 1, 2020 at 3:08:29 PM UTC-6, Terry Reedy wrote:
> Because BaseClass is the superclass of SubClass.
So there's a mechanism for parent classes to know all their children?
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 3/1/2020 4:49 AM, Adam Preble wrote:
Based on what I was seeing here, I did some experiments to try to understand
better what is going on:
class BaseClass:
def __init__(self):
self.a = 1
def base_method(self):
return self.a
def another_base_method(self):
Based on what I was seeing here, I did some experiments to try to understand
better what is going on:
class BaseClass:
def __init__(self):
self.a = 1
def base_method(self):
return self.a
def another_base_method(self):
return self.a + 1
class SubClass(BaseCl
On 2/28/2020 2:21 AM, Adam Preble wrote:
I have been making some progress on my custom interpreter project but I found I
have totally blown implementing proper subclassing in the data model. What I
have right now is PyClass defining what a PyObject is. When I make a PyObject
from a PyClass, th
I have been making some progress on my custom interpreter project but I found I
have totally blown implementing proper subclassing in the data model. What I
have right now is PyClass defining what a PyObject is. When I make a PyObject
from a PyClass, the PyObject sets up a __dict__ that is used
