In message 49e30ac0$0$6828$5fc3...@news.tiscali.it, Francesco Bochicchio
wrote:
Which is pretty sensible, since good engineering is often based more on
choosing the right trade-off rather than choosing the One Right Thing to
do.
Yes, but remember that, too, is a tradeoff. Moderation is fine,
John Yeung ha scritto:
On Apr 11, 10:08 am, Emmanuel Surleau emmanuel.surl...@gmail.com
wrote:
Having written a few trivial scripts in Python, I'm curious as
to how you would sum up the Pythonic philosophy of development.
A couple of others have already mentioned the Zen of Python, available
Pythonic--an acid, capable of reacting with bases to form pythanates?
Would it be an organic or inorganic acid?
Deprive it of a bit of oxygen, and it becomes pythonous, reacting to form
pythonites.
What do you mean, the fume cupboard's broken down? Honestly I feel fine...
--
En Sun, 12 Apr 2009 08:16:19 -0300, Lawrence D'Oliveiro
l...@geek-central.gen.new_zealand escribió:
Pythonic--an acid, capable of reacting with bases to form pythanates?
Would it be an organic or inorganic acid?
Deprive it of a bit of oxygen, and it becomes pythonous, reacting to form
Hi there,
I'm starting an exploratory foray into Python, being generally dissatisfied
with the Ruby ecosystem (while the language is wonderful, third party
libraries and documentation are not).
Having written a few trivial scripts in Python, I'm curious as to how you
would sum up the Pythonic
Having written a few trivial scripts in Python, I'm curious as to how you
would sum up the Pythonic philosophy of development. Judging from Python, it
seems to exclude (mostly) magical variables like '$.'. Is this right? What
else would you include in this definition?
At the python
Emm Having written a few trivial scripts in Python, I'm curious as to
Emm how you would sum up the Pythonic philosophy of development.
Try
import this
at your friendly, neighborhood Python prompt.
--
Skip Montanaro - s...@pobox.com - http://www.smontanaro.net/
XML sucks,
In article mailman.3700.1239458914.11746.python-l...@python.org,
Emmanuel Surleau emmanuel.surl...@gmail.com wrote:
Having written a few trivial scripts in Python, I'm curious as to how you
would sum up the Pythonic philosophy of development. Judging from Python, it
seems to exclude (mostly)
On Apr 11, 10:08 am, Emmanuel Surleau emmanuel.surl...@gmail.com
wrote:
Having written a few trivial scripts in Python, I'm curious as
to how you would sum up the Pythonic philosophy of development.
A couple of others have already mentioned the Zen of Python, available
at the Python command
John Yeung wrote:
On Apr 11, 10:08 am, Emmanuel Surleau emmanuel.surl...@gmail.com
wrote:
Having written a few trivial scripts in Python, I'm curious as
to how you would sum up the Pythonic philosophy of development.
A couple of others have already mentioned the Zen of Python, available
at
On Saturday 11 April 2009 18:00:58 John Yeung wrote:
On Apr 11, 10:08 am, Emmanuel Surleau emmanuel.surl...@gmail.com
wrote:
Having written a few trivial scripts in Python, I'm curious as
to how you would sum up the Pythonic philosophy of development.
A couple of others have already
John Yeung gallium.arsen...@gmail.com writes:
A couple of others have already mentioned the Zen of Python, available
at the Python command prompt. I would agree with that, but also add
the caveat that none of the principles expressed there are hard-and-
fast rules.
Indeed, I'd suggest that
12 matches
Mail list logo
