Daniel Eduardo Almeida Correa writes:
> Hello, I'm trying to use the machine library in python 3.10 version, but I
> can't import it with the pip install machine, could you tell me a way to
> solve it or a python version compatible with the library? Thank you a lot
> for your answer.
The
On 2021-11-21 18:36, Daniel Eduardo Almeida Correa wrote:
Hello, I'm trying to use the machine library in python 3.10 version, but I
can't import it with the pip install machine, could you tell me a way to
solve it or a python version compatible with the library? Thank you a lot
for your
Hello, I'm trying to use the machine library in python 3.10 version, but I
can't import it with the pip install machine, could you tell me a way to
solve it or a python version compatible with the library? Thank you a lot
for your answer.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Abhiram R writes:
[...]
> https://github.com/rkern/line_profiler
>
> The definition for the time column says -
>
> "Time: The total amount of time spent executing the line in the timer's
> units. In the header information before the tables, you will see a line
> 'Timer
I'm having trouble understanding something in the documentation of
https://github.com/rkern/line_profiler
The definition for the time column says -
"Time: The total amount of time spent executing the line in the timer's
units. In the header information before the tables, you will see a line
On Tue, 14 Feb 2017 09:13:48 -0800 (PST), José Manuel Suárez Sierra wrote:
> hello,
> im trying to read a rtf or txt file with this python script:
>
> with open(dirFichero,'r') as reader:
> for line in reader:
> print line
>
> the problem is that shown is : [suppressing blank lines]
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 11:31 AM, Joaquin Alzola
wrote:
>
>>with open(dirFichero,'r') as reader:
> > for line in reader:
> > print line
>>
>>the problem is that shown is :
>>{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\cocoartf1504\cocoasubrtf810
>>{\fonttbl\f0\fswiss\fcharset0
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 11:13 AM, José Manuel Suárez Sierra
wrote:
> hello,
> im trying to read a rtf or txt file with this python script:
>
> with open(dirFichero,'r') as reader:
> for line in reader:
> print line
>
> the problem is that shown is :
>
>
>with open(dirFichero,'r') as reader:
> for line in reader:
> print line
>
>the problem is that shown is :
>{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\cocoartf1504\cocoasubrtf810
>{\fonttbl\f0\fswiss\fcharset0 Helvetica;}
>{\colortbl;\red255\green255\blue255;}
>{\*\expandedcolortbl;;}
hello,
im trying to read a rtf or txt file with this python script:
with open(dirFichero,'r') as reader:
for line in reader:
print line
the problem is that shown is :
{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\cocoartf1504\cocoasubrtf810
{\fonttbl\f0\fswiss\fcharset0 Helvetica;}
José Manuel Suárez Sierra wrote:
> El miércoles, 1 de febrero de 2017, 11:55:11 (UTC+1), José Manuel Suárez
> Sierra escribió:
>> hello everyone,
>> Im trying to make a program that takes an archive from pdb (for instance
>> this link http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/files/fasta.txt?structureIdList=5HXY
El miércoles, 1 de febrero de 2017, 11:55:11 (UTC+1), José Manuel Suárez Sierra
escribió:
> hello everyone,
> Im trying to make a program that takes an archive from pdb (for instance this
> link http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/files/fasta.txt?structureIdList=5HXY
>
> after reading it I want it to save
José Manuel Suárez Sierra wrote:
> hello everyone,
> Im trying to make a program that takes an archive from pdb (for instance
> this link http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/files/fasta.txt?structureIdList=5HXY
>
> after reading it I want it to save in a list only this part of the
> archive:
>
>
hello everyone,
Im trying to make a program that takes an archive from pdb (for instance this
link http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/files/fasta.txt?structureIdList=5HXY
after reading it I want it to save in a list only this part of the archive:
José Manuel Suárez Sierra wrote:
> Hello, I want to go over matrix indexs with this code:
> def comparador2(a, b):
> c3 = ["0"] # variables
> x = -1 # contador de letras aniadidas a c3
> i = 0 # contador bucle secuencia a
> j = 0 # contador bucle secuencia b
> l1 = len(a)
Always Post the entire traceback. That will show us the line of code that
raised the error, as well as the sequence of function calls involved.
On Jan 12, 2017 11:10 AM, "José Manuel Suárez Sierra" <
josemsuarezsie...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello, I want to go over matrix indexs with this code:
>
Hello, I want to go over matrix indexs with this code:
def comparador2(a, b):
c3 = ["0"] # variables
x = -1 # contador de letras aniadidas a c3
i = 0 # contador bucle secuencia a
j = 0 # contador bucle secuencia b
l1 = len(a)
l2 = len(b)
cont = [] # contador de
Honestly, the best implementation strategy I can think of is to first
implement a Python interpreter for the actual mainframe environment.
Then invent an RPC layer that can semi-transparently bridge the two for
when you want to call a module that only exists in the Windows
environment (or call
Let me rephrase my question in other way.
class myClass:
def __init__(self, var):
self.var = var
myObj = myClass(abc)
# I am calling instance with function name and arguments
myObj func1 arg1 arg2
Can i associate any function like __init__ with instance ? Means if I just use
On Thu, Oct 6, 2016, at 19:27, Loren Wilton wrote:
> So I don't want to WRITE a Python interpreter for the actual mainframe
> environment. I want to use an interpreter for an existing environment
> (Windows) where there are already a lot of existing libraries. But
> since a lot of the data to be
Well I jump from TCL to Python. And found that it was very convenient to use
Procs there. So I was looking for that luxury in Python.
I am not trying to reinvent the wheel. I was just curious to know if there is
any possibility to create a caller function in my way (TCL) where I can call
"Loren Wilton" writes:
> strength of Python is that there are many existing 3rd party libraries
> that do lots of useful things. Since a lot of them are distributed as
> binaries, they would not work in this mainframe environment.
Python libraries are usually available
Oops, apologies for replying to the wrong thread!
Loren
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 06/10/2016 18:06, mr.puneet.go...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I just started learning python. Is there any way to call functions in different
way ?
Rather calling obj.function(arg1, arg2) I would like to call like below
"obj function arg1 arg2"
As has been pointed out, it's difficult to tell
[Cue the decades-old story about the elaborate set of C macros that I
once saw somebody using so he could write a C program that looked like
some flavor of structured BASIC.]
I once wrote a set pf C defines so that I could compile Pascal with a C
compiler without having to change the Pascal
On 2016-10-06, Steve D'Aprano wrote:
> The only way to do this will be to write your own pre-processor, which will
> parse your source code, and translate it from your language to valid
> Python. That's a lot of work for very little value -- I recommend you just
>
On Fri, 7 Oct 2016 04:06 am, mr.puneet.go...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi
>
> I just started learning python. Is there any way to call functions in
> different way ?
>
> Rather calling obj.function(arg1, arg2) I would like to call like below
>
> "obj function arg1 arg2"
No. This will be a syntax
mr.puneet.go...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi
>
> I just started learning python. Is there any way to call functions in
> different way ?
>
> Rather calling obj.function(arg1, arg2) I would like to call like below
>
> "obj function arg1 arg2"
How would the machine reading the above know that you
Hi
I just started learning python. Is there any way to call functions in different
way ?
Rather calling obj.function(arg1, arg2) I would like to call like below
"obj function arg1 arg2"
this function is part of a class.
class myClass:
def function(arg1, arg2):
# do something
Rustom Mody wrote:
> I have a doubt:
> Is it incorrect to correct someone when they are incorrect?
No doubt about it. Everyone's a winner...
> [Sprinkle a "politically" on the above to taste ]
Ah, contradictio in adiecto. That shifts it to definitely maybe.
--
http
On Wednesday, April 13, 2016 at 10:30:07 PM UTC+5:30, Peter Otten wrote:
> alister wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 06:18:22 -0700, durgadevi1 wrote:
> >
> >> I have a doubt regarding a problem.
> >>
> > No, you have a question doubt means you
alister wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 06:18:22 -0700, durgadevi1 wrote:
>
>> I have a doubt regarding a problem.
>>
> No, you have a question doubt means you don't believe something
> (sorry I know this is not an English language lesson)
"doubt" is commonly us
That's an awesome response!
On Jan 7, 2016 6:35 AM, "Chris Angelico" wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 2:20 PM, Henrique Correa wrote:
> > Is Python's Tutorial (by Guido) a good and complete reference for the
> > language? I mean, after reading it, should I
On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 2:20 PM, Henrique Correa wrote:
> Is Python's Tutorial (by Guido) a good and complete reference for the
> language? I mean, after reading it, should I have a good basis on Python?
>
> I've came from js and php, and already know the very basics of py.
>
>
Is Python's Tutorial (by Guido) a good and complete reference for the
language? I mean, after reading it, should I have a good basis on Python?
I've came from js and php, and already know the very basics of py.
Thank you!
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Às 03:20 de 07-01-2016, Henrique Correa escreveu:
> Is Python's Tutorial (by Guido) a good and complete reference for the
> language?
Good yes. Complete no.
I mean, after reading it, should I have a good basis on Python?
Yes if you know how to program on another language.
>
HTH
Paulo
--
Op 26-11-13 22:42, Tim Delaney schreef:
On 27 November 2013 03:57, Antoon Pardon antoon.par...@rece.vub.ac.be
mailto:antoon.par...@rece.vub.ac.be wrote:
So I can now ask my questions in dutch and expect others to try and
understand me instead of me asking them in english? Or can I
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 7:16 PM, Antoon Pardon
antoon.par...@rece.vub.ac.be wrote:
However that second sentence doesn't make much sense to me. Modern
languages contain a subset that is called the standard language. This
is the subset that is generally taught. Especially to those for whom
the
Op 27-11-13 09:19, Chris Angelico schreef:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 7:16 PM, Antoon Pardon
antoon.par...@rece.vub.ac.be wrote:
However that second sentence doesn't make much sense to me. Modern
languages contain a subset that is called the standard language. This
is the subset that is
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 7:31 PM, Antoon Pardon
antoon.par...@rece.vub.ac.be wrote:
Op 27-11-13 09:19, Chris Angelico schreef:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 7:16 PM, Antoon Pardon
antoon.par...@rece.vub.ac.be wrote:
However that second sentence doesn't make much sense to me. Modern
languages contain
Op 27-11-13 09:36, Chris Angelico schreef:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 7:31 PM, Antoon Pardon
antoon.par...@rece.vub.ac.be wrote:
Op 27-11-13 09:19, Chris Angelico schreef:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 7:16 PM, Antoon Pardon
antoon.par...@rece.vub.ac.be wrote:
However that second sentence doesn't
On Wednesday, November 27, 2013 7:41:54 AM UTC+5:30, Ned Batchelder wrote:
On 11/26/13 8:26 PM, Rick Johnson wrote:
Classic Rick Rant
And will you be here to explain to time-travelling Shakespeare why we
are all of us speaking English completely wrong (to his ears)?
And to my (Indian!!)
On Wednesday, November 27, 2013 3:02:54 PM UTC+5:30, rusi wrote:
[Last line cut-off by mistake!]
It is my impression that the arguments that happen in/around
programming languages are more-heat-less-light than in typical
art/science because artistic questions masquerade as
Steven D'Aprano writes:
On Tue, 26 Nov 2013 20:24:16 -0800, Rick Johnson wrote:
Although i would strongly prefer for him to choose ubiquitous
definitions *over* regional definitions when posting to internet
forums, i would have happily ignored this thread had it not been
for Stevens
On Wednesday, November 27, 2013 12:18:11 PM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Tue, 26 Nov 2013 17:26:48 -0800, Rick Johnson wrote:
[...]
A new home-run record!
What is this home-run of which you speak? Houses don't generally run.
Surely you're not using a regional idiom outside of your
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 8:47 PM, rusi rustompm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday, November 27, 2013 12:18:11 PM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Tue, 26 Nov 2013 17:26:48 -0800, Rick Johnson wrote:
[...]
A new home-run record!
What is this home-run of which you speak? Houses don't
* we can understand why the words question and
doubt should NEVER be used interchangeably.
Now Rick, I know that you're a speaker of a regional variation of
English, so you might not be familiar with the standard meanings of the
word doubt in English, including:
3. A point about which one
On 27/11/2013 08:16, Antoon Pardon wrote:
Op 26-11-13 22:42, Tim Delaney schreef:
On 27 November 2013 03:57, Antoon Pardon antoon.par...@rece.vub.ac.be
mailto:antoon.par...@rece.vub.ac.be wrote:
So I can now ask my questions in dutch and expect others to try and
understand me
On 11/26/13 11:24 PM, Rick Johnson wrote:
On Tuesday, November 26, 2013 8:11:54 PM UTC-6, Ned Batchelder wrote:
Rick, through all the verbiage, I've lost track of what you are
advocating. The OP asks a question and uses the word doubt in a way
that is unusual to you and many other, though
rusi rustompm...@gmail.com writes:
Propositionally: All languages are equal -- Turing complete
As an aside, not all languages are Turing complete. For example Charity
is a language with the property that programs are guaranteed to
terminate.
On 2013-11-27 08:31, Antoon Pardon wrote:
Op 27-11-13 09:19, Chris Angelico schreef:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 7:16 PM, Antoon Pardon
antoon.par...@rece.vub.ac.be wrote:
However that second sentence doesn't make much sense to me. Modern
languages contain a subset that is called the standard
On 2013-11-27 08:16, Antoon Pardon wrote:
Op 26-11-13 22:42, Tim Delaney schreef:
On 27 November 2013 03:57, Antoon Pardon antoon.par...@rece.vub.ac.be
mailto:antoon.par...@rece.vub.ac.be wrote:
So I can now ask my questions in dutch and expect others to try and
understand me
On Wednesday 27 November 2013 07:44:18 rusi did opine:
On Wednesday, November 27, 2013 7:41:54 AM UTC+5:30, Ned Batchelder
wrote:
On 11/26/13 8:26 PM, Rick Johnson wrote:
Classic Rick Rant
And will you be here to explain to time-travelling Shakespeare why we
are all of us speaking
On Wednesday, November 27, 2013 6:27:52 PM UTC+5:30, Robert Kern wrote:
On 2013-11-27 08:16, Antoon Pardon wrote:
Op 26-11-13 22:42, Tim Delaney schreef:
On 27 November 2013 03:57, Antoon Pardon wrote:
So I can now ask my questions in dutch and expect others to try and
as the doubt/question distinction.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LVzwJ6WWlHAt=5m06s
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 2013-11-27 13:29, rusi wrote:
On Wednesday, November 27, 2013 6:27:52 PM UTC+5:30, Robert Kern wrote:
On 2013-11-27 08:16, Antoon Pardon wrote:
Op 26-11-13 22:42, Tim Delaney schreef:
On 27 November 2013 03:57, Antoon Pardon wrote:
So I can now ask my questions in dutch and expect
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 5:31 AM, Paul Rudin paul.nos...@rudin.co.uk wrote:
rusi rustompm...@gmail.com writes:
Propositionally: All languages are equal -- Turing complete
As an aside, not all languages are Turing complete. For example Charity
is a language with the property that programs are
On Wednesday, November 27, 2013 7:39:37 PM UTC+5:30, Larry wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 5:31 AM, Paul Rudin wrote:
rusi writes:
Propositionally: All languages are equal -- Turing complete
As an aside, not all languages are Turing complete. For example Charity
is a language with the
On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 09:09:37 -0500, Larry Martell wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 5:31 AM, Paul Rudin paul.nos...@rudin.co.uk
wrote:
rusi rustompm...@gmail.com writes:
Propositionally: All languages are equal -- Turing complete
As an aside, not all languages are Turing complete. For example
On 11/27/13 8:18 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Wednesday 27 November 2013 07:44:18 rusi did opine:
On Wednesday, November 27, 2013 7:41:54 AM UTC+5:30, Ned Batchelder
wrote:
On 11/26/13 8:26 PM, Rick Johnson wrote:
Classic Rick Rant
And will you be here to explain to time-travelling
On 2013-11-27 01:32, rusi wrote:
And will you be here to explain to time-travelling Shakespeare
why we are all of us speaking English completely wrong (to his
ears)?
And to my (Indian!!) ears when Tim says 'plank in the eye' where
King James says 'beam' it does not cut it.
Well, would
On Wednesday, November 27, 2013 9:55:12 PM UTC+5:30, Tim Chase wrote:
On 2013-11-27 01:32, rusi wrote:
And will you be here to explain to time-travelling Shakespeare
why we are all of us speaking English completely wrong (to his
ears)?
And to my (Indian!!) ears when Tim says 'plank
On 27/11/2013 7:12 PM, Antoon Pardon wrote:
However that there is no perfect solution doesn't imply
we can't expect some effort from those with english as a mother
tongue to search for ways in which to express themselves that are
more likely to be understood by those who had to learn english
as
In article l764gb$5k5$1...@dont-email.me, alex23 wuwe...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 27/11/2013 7:12 PM, Antoon Pardon wrote:
However that there is no perfect solution doesn't imply
we can't expect some effort from those with english as a mother
tongue to search for ways in which to express
On 2013-11-27 20:08, Roy Smith wrote:
How do you expect people to know they're using a local idiom?
Look it up in Urban Dictionary and Bob's your uncle.
I thought that's how one could tell if it was an *inappropriate*
idiom. As a matter of fact, I'm surprised that Bob's your uncle
doesn't
On 11/25/13 10:33 PM, Rick Johnson wrote: On Monday, November 25, 2013 2:10:04
PM UTC-6, Ned Batchelder wrote:
Let's please avoid veering off into rants about language
and philosophy now.
Hello Ned. I respect the fact that you want to keep threads
on-topic, and i greatly appreciate the
In article mailman.3219.1385452076.18130.python-l...@python.org,
Antoon Pardon antoon.par...@rece.vub.ac.be wrote:
So I think we may expect more effort from the writer in trying to be
understandable than from the readers in trying to understand. And
that includes idiom use.
We live in an
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 1:37 AM, Roy Smith r...@panix.com wrote:
We live in an international world (otherwise we wouldn't need that
annoying unicode stuff). When you say, effort to be understandable,
what you're really saying is, everybody should be just like me.
Unfortunately, that's not
On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 01:52:11 +1100, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 1:37 AM, Roy Smith r...@panix.com wrote:
We live in an international world (otherwise we wouldn't need that
annoying unicode stuff). When you say, effort to be understandable,
what you're really saying is,
Op 26-11-13 15:37, Roy Smith schreef:
In article mailman.3219.1385452076.18130.python-l...@python.org,
Antoon Pardon antoon.par...@rece.vub.ac.be wrote:
So I think we may expect more effort from the writer in trying to be
understandable than from the readers in trying to understand. And
On Tuesday 26 November 2013 10:49:07 Alister did opine:
On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 01:52:11 +1100, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 1:37 AM, Roy Smith r...@panix.com wrote:
We live in an international world (otherwise we wouldn't need that
annoying unicode stuff). When you say,
On 27 November 2013 03:57, Antoon Pardon antoon.par...@rece.vub.ac.bewrote:
So I can now ask my questions in dutch and expect others to try and
understand me instead of me asking them in english? Or can I use
literal translations of dutch idioms even if I suspect that such
a literal
OF DEMONIC
EMOTIONAL DISTRESS IS A NOBLE PURSUIT, HOWEVER,
SANCTIONING THE ILLOGICAL DISCOMBOBULATION OF
DEFINED WORDS FROM THEIR UBIQUITOUS DEFINITIONS CAN
BE NOTHING LESS THAN ILLOGICAL SUICIDE BY EMOTION.
Now... *hopefully* we can understand why the words question
and doubt should
why the words question
and doubt should NEVER be used interchangeably.
But for those of you who still seek coddling, read on...
When you say, effort to be understandable, what you're
really saying is, everybody should be just like me
a question, we immediately assume
that they are not confused, and have no concern at all.
[...]
Now... *hopefully* we can understand why the words question and
doubt should NEVER be used interchangeably.
Now Rick, I know that you're a speaker of a regional variation of
English, so you might
On Tue, 26 Nov 2013 20:24:16 -0800, Rick Johnson wrote:
Although i would strongly prefer for him to choose ubiquitous
definitions *over* regional definitions when posting to internet forums,
i would have happily ignored this thread had it not been for Stevens
emotional plea of:
As this
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 5:48 PM, Steven D'Aprano st...@pearwood.info wrote:
I completely sniglim with what you are saying. I'd go further and state
that, without exception, your argument is the most vumtigious I've ever
seen, and if there were any justice in the world, people would follow you
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 5:56 PM, Steven D'Aprano st...@pearwood.info wrote:
On Tue, 26 Nov 2013 20:24:16 -0800, Rick Johnson wrote:
Pop Quiz
Your driving your car down the
On 2013-11-23, Steven D'Aprano steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote:
On Sat, 23 Nov 2013 01:55:44 +, Denis McMahon wrote:
On Fri, 22 Nov 2013 18:22:29 +0530, Bharath Kummar wrote:
Could you PLEASE provide me with the codes (codes only for the asked
queries) ?
The codes are:
On 2013-11-23, Dave Angel da...@davea.name wrote:
Try posting in text, as some of us see nothing in your message. This
is a text newsgroup, not html.
Also make a subject line that summarizes your issue, not the urgency.
An exclamation mark is a yellow flag, and three should definitly route
On Mon, 25 Nov 2013 16:25:57 +, Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2013-11-23, Dave Angel da...@davea.name wrote:
Try posting in text, as some of us see nothing in your message. This is
a text newsgroup, not html.
Also make a subject line that summarizes your issue, not the urgency.
An
On Saturday, November 23, 2013 7:38:47 PM UTC-6, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
Where do you, an American,
What the hell makes you believe I'm an American? Because i
speak fluent English? Because i embrace capitalism? Because
i wish to be free of tyranny? Well, if that's all it takes
to be an American,
Op 23-11-13 03:18, Steven D'Aprano schreef:
On Sat, 23 Nov 2013 01:55:44 +, Denis McMahon wrote:
On Fri, 22 Nov 2013 18:22:29 +0530, Bharath Kummar wrote:
Could you PLEASE provide me with the codes (codes only for the asked
queries) ?
The codes are:
1)
I'm not an expert on Indian English, but I understand that in that
dialect it is grammatically correct to say the codes, just as in UK and
US English it is grammatically correct to say the programs.
In other words, in UK/US English, code in the sense of programming code
is an uncountable
On Monday, November 25, 2013 2:32:12 PM UTC-5, Rick Johnson wrote:
On Saturday, November 23, 2013 7:38:47 PM UTC-6, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
Where do you, an American,
What the hell makes you believe I'm an American? Because i
speak fluent English? Because i embrace capitalism? Because
i
On 11/25/2013 11:53 AM, Antoon Pardon wrote:
Op 23-11-13 03:18, Steven D'Aprano schreef:
As this is an international forum, it behoves us all to make allowances
for slight difference in dialect.
I don't see how that follows. I would say on the contrary. This being
an international forum
Ned Batchelder wrote:
Let's please avoid veering off into rants about language
and philosophy now.
Philosophy is totally on topic for this group:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-2gJamguN04
--
Greg
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Gregory Ewing
greg.ew...@canterbury.ac.nzwrote:
Ned Batchelder wrote:
Let's please avoid veering off into rants about language
and philosophy now.
Philosophy is totally on topic for this group:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-2gJamguN04
A classic! I
On Monday, November 25, 2013 2:10:04 PM UTC-6, Ned Batchelder wrote:
Let's please avoid veering off into rants about language
and philosophy now.
Hello Ned. I respect the fact that you want to keep threads
on-topic, and i greatly appreciate the humbleness of your
request.
However, i feel as
Op 25-11-13 21:00, Ethan Furman schreef:
On 11/25/2013 11:53 AM, Antoon Pardon wrote:
Op 23-11-13 03:18, Steven D'Aprano schreef:
As this is an international forum, it behoves us all to make allowances
for slight difference in dialect.
I don't see how that follows. I would say on the
already found it necessary to explain
the specific use of doubt by the OP.
Not that I mind that much but as has been said multiple times, a
contribution is only written once and read many times. So I think
we may expect more effort from the writer in trying to be
understandable than from the readers
On Saturday 2013 November 23 23:32, Devin Jeanpierre wrote:
This list needs stronger moderation
Rule #1: The ML should not disseminate any message which contains an
unquoted please.
--
Yonder nor sorghum stenches shut ladle gulls stopper torque wet
strainers.
--
On Nov 23, 2013, at 1:42 AM, Ian Kelly ian.g.ke...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 7:18 PM, Steven D'Aprano
steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote:
I'm not an expert on Indian English, but I understand that in that
dialect it is grammatically correct to say the codes, just as in
On 23/11/2013 02:18, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
In other words, in UK/US English,
UK English? Clearly you've never been to Newcastle upon Tyne or Glasgow :)
--
Python is the second best programming language in the world.
But the best has yet to be invented. Christian Tismer
Mark Lawrence
--
On 2013-11-23 10:44, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
On Fri, 22 Nov 2013 23:42:44 -0700, Ian Kelly
ian.g.ke...@gmail.com declaimed the following:
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 8:47 PM, Dennis Lee Bieber
wlfr...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
Rice is the plural of rouse
Not according to the
By the same logic
the plural of spouse is spice and most men that have had more
than one wife will tell you that, whilst it may be the
expectation, it ain't necessarily so ;-)
On 23/11/2013 16:44, Dennis Lee Bieber
wrote:
On
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 3:35 AM, Tim Chase
python.l...@tim.thechases.com wrote:
Mice/Mouse Rice/*Rouse
Wordplay is one of my worst vouse. ;-)
Yeah, some people can come up with bad puns in a trouse.
ChrisA
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 23/11/2013 17:35, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 3:35 AM, Tim Chase
python.l...@tim.thechases.com wrote:
Mice/Mouse Rice/*Rouse
Wordplay is one of my worst vouse. ;-)
Yeah, some people can come up with bad puns in a trouse.
ChrisA
Well! That wasn't very nouse!
On Sat, 23 Nov 2013 02:18:03 +, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Sat, 23 Nov 2013 01:55:44 +, Denis McMahon wrote:
On Fri, 22 Nov 2013 18:22:29 +0530, Bharath Kummar wrote:
Could you PLEASE provide me with the codes (codes only for the asked
queries) ?
The codes are:
1)
On Friday, November 22, 2013 8:18:03 PM UTC-6, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
[snip] I look forward to the day that rice is the plural of ri
Yes and i look forward to the day when thread hijacking perpetrated under the
guise of exploring linguistic minutia perpetrated under the guise of vanity
is
1 - 100 of 301 matches
Mail list logo