Sebastian Wiesner a écrit :
At Thu, 16 Oct 2008 18:21:38 +0200 wrote Bruno Desthuilliers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
It doesn't look like there's
any way to browse the subversion any more, though.
Doh :(
Is there any way to get this version then ???
svn co
Damien Wyart wrote:
* Carl Banks [EMAIL PROTECTED] in comp.lang.python:
The python-mode.el on Subversion (python-mode's Subversion on source
forge, not the ancient version of python-mode in the Python
repository) has a fix for this issue. It doesn't look like there's any
way to browse the
Alberto Griggio [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello,
I second Bruno's points, the older python-mode.el is much
better,
I agree too. I can't really say what's missing from python.el, but I'm
much more comfortable with python-mode.el. The triple-quote highlight is
better in python.el, but I
Alberto Griggio [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello,
I second Bruno's points, the older python-mode.el is much
better,
I agree too. I can't really say what's missing from python.el, but I'm
much more comfortable with python-mode.el. The triple-quote highlight is
better in python.el, but I
* Carl Banks [EMAIL PROTECTED] in comp.lang.python:
The python-mode.el on Subversion (python-mode's Subversion on source
forge, not the ancient version of python-mode in the Python
repository) has a fix for this issue. It doesn't look like there's any
way to browse the subversion any more,
* Carl Banks [EMAIL PROTECTED] in comp.lang.python:
The python-mode.el on Subversion (python-mode's Subversion on source
forge, not the ancient version of python-mode in the Python
repository) has a fix for this issue.
Btw, I have not found a reference to this fix in the subversion history.
At Thu, 16 Oct 2008 18:21:38 +0200 wrote Bruno Desthuilliers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
It doesn't look like there's
any way to browse the subversion any more, though.
Doh :(
Is there any way to get this version then ???
svn co https://python-mode.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/python-mode/trunk/
On Oct 17, 4:25 am, Damien Wyart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Carl Banks [EMAIL PROTECTED] in comp.lang.python:
The python-mode.el on Subversion (python-mode's Subversion on source
forge, not the ancient version of python-mode in the Python
repository) has a fix for this issue. It doesn't
On Oct 16, 8:37 am, Michele Simionato [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Oct 14, 7:37 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you're an Emacs user who has used both python-mode.el (the python mode
code distributed with Python and XEmacs) and python.el (the python mode code
distributed with GNU Emacs),
On Oct 16, 12:54 am, Bruno Desthuilliers
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lawrence D'Oliveiro a écrit :
I find Emacs modes just too confusing. I do all my editing in fundamental
mode.
Sounds like buying a cray supercomputer to end up doing computation by
hand...
Reminds me of a funny story about
In message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], rustom
wrote:
Reminds me of a funny story about one of our university profs.
At a time when we used DOS and unix (on terminals) he got a very high
end SGI workstation.
And promptly shouted at the sysads because he could not see his
C:
prompt.
The joke was on
Hello,
I second Bruno's points, the older python-mode.el is much
better,
I agree too. I can't really say what's missing from python.el, but I'm
much more comfortable with python-mode.el. The triple-quote highlight is
better in python.el, but I was successful in porting it to
python-mode.el as
On Oct 14, 1:05 pm, Bruno Desthuilliers
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- a slightly less but still annoying problem (I wouldn't
call it a bug)
is the handling of indentation for nested litteral dicts/lists/tuples.
The python-mode.el on Subversion (python-mode's Subversion on source
forge, not the
Carl Banks a écrit :
On Oct 14, 1:05 pm, Bruno Desthuilliers
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- a slightly less but still annoying problem (I wouldn't
call it a bug)
is the handling of indentation for nested litteral dicts/lists/tuples.
The python-mode.el on Subversion (python-mode's Subversion on
rustom a écrit :
(snip)
I am interested in knowing which mode supports better the use of pdb
inside emacs?
Since you mention this, I think I remember having a couple issues here
with python-mode.el - but that was a long time ago, and I usually don't
use pdb within the emacs-python-shell
On Oct 16, 12:21 pm, Bruno Desthuilliers
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Carl Banks a écrit :
On Oct 14, 1:05 pm, Bruno Desthuilliers
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- a slightly less but still annoying problem (I wouldn't
call it a bug)
is the handling of indentation for nested litteral
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you're an Emacs user who has used both python-mode.el (the python mode
code distributed with Python and XEmacs) and python.el (the python mode code
distributed with GNU Emacs), I'd like to get your impressions on how they
compare and where you feel the bugs lie.
Lawrence D'Oliveiro a écrit :
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you're an Emacs user who has used both python-mode.el (the python mode
code distributed with Python and XEmacs) and python.el (the python mode
code distributed with GNU Emacs), I'd like to get your
Paul Rubin a écrit :
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If you're an Emacs user who has used both python-mode.el (the python mode
code distributed with Python and XEmacs) and python.el (the python mode code
distributed with GNU Emacs), I'd like to get your impressions on how they
compare and where you
On Oct 14, 7:37 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you're an Emacs user who has used both python-mode.el (the python mode
code distributed with Python and XEmacs) and python.el (the python mode code
distributed with GNU Emacs), I'd like to get your impressions on how they
compare and where you
If you're an Emacs user who has used both python-mode.el (the python mode
code distributed with Python and XEmacs) and python.el (the python mode code
distributed with GNU Emacs), I'd like to get your impressions on how they
compare and where you feel the bugs lie. I'm nominally one of the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
If you're an Emacs user who has used both python-mode.el (the python mode
code distributed with Python and XEmacs) and python.el (the python mode code
distributed with GNU Emacs), I'd like to get your impressions on how they
compare and where you feel the bugs lie.
Bruno Desthuilliers schrieb:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
If you're an Emacs user who has used both python-mode.el (the python mode
code distributed with Python and XEmacs) and python.el (the python
mode code
distributed with GNU Emacs), I'd like to get your impressions on how they
compare and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If you're an Emacs user who has used both python-mode.el (the python mode
code distributed with Python and XEmacs) and python.el (the python mode code
distributed with GNU Emacs), I'd like to get your impressions on how they
compare and where you feel the bugs lie.
Paul Main thing I know is that C-c ! used to make a new Python
Paul subwindow and now it doesn't, which is bad.
That's probably the newer FSF version, python.el. Someone else complained
that it didn't do Python interpreters.
Skip
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you're an Emacs user who has used both python-mode.el (the python mode
code distributed with Python and XEmacs) and python.el (the python mode
code distributed with GNU Emacs), I'd like to get your impressions on how
they compare ...
26 matches
Mail list logo
