Re: Fallback for operator and other dunder methods

2023-08-04 Thread Dom Grigonis via Python-list
The issue was more of a wrapping around numpy array. Found the solution already. Unfortunately, there is no equivalent to __getattr__, the only way is to dynamically define them from meta. It seems it’s pretty standard to just have a collection of special method names and using them for similar

Re: Fallback for operator and other dunder methods

2023-08-04 Thread Edmondo Giovannozzi via Python-list
Il giorno mercoledì 26 luglio 2023 alle 20:35:53 UTC+2 Dom Grigonis ha scritto: > Tried exactly that and didn’t work. Neither __getattr__, nor __getattribute__ > of meta is being invoked. > > On 26 Jul 2023, at 10:01, Chris Angelico via Python-list > > wrote: > > > > On Wed, 26 Jul 2023 at

Re: Fallback for operator and other dunder methods

2023-07-26 Thread Dom Grigonis via Python-list
Tried exactly that and didn’t work. Neither __getattr__, nor __getattribute__ of meta is being invoked. > On 26 Jul 2023, at 10:01, Chris Angelico via Python-list > wrote: > > On Wed, 26 Jul 2023 at 16:52, Dom Grigonis wrote: >> >> Could you give an example? Something isn’t working for me.

Re: Fallback for operator and other dunder methods

2023-07-26 Thread Dieter Maurer via Python-list
Dom Grigonis wrote at 2023-7-26 05:22 +0300: > ... >Is there a way to achieve it without actually implementing operators? >I have looked at Proxy objects, but they do not seem suited to achieve this. Proxying is a good approach: you might have a look at `dm.reuse.proxy.OverridingProxy` (-->

Re: Fallback for operator and other dunder methods

2023-07-26 Thread Chris Angelico via Python-list
On Wed, 26 Jul 2023 at 16:52, Dom Grigonis wrote: > > Could you give an example? Something isn’t working for me. > This is a metaclass: class Meta(type): ... class Demo(metaclass=Meta): ... In order to catch those kinds of attribute lookups, you'll need the metaclass to hook them. And

Re: Fallback for operator and other dunder methods

2023-07-26 Thread Dom Grigonis via Python-list
Could you give an example? Something isn’t working for me. > On 26 Jul 2023, at 09:40, Chris Angelico via Python-list > wrote: > > On Wed, 26 Jul 2023 at 12:23, Dom Grigonis via Python-list > wrote: >> print(a + 1)# TypeError: unsupported operand type(s) for +: 'A' >> and 'int'

Re: Fallback for operator and other dunder methods

2023-07-26 Thread Chris Angelico via Python-list
On Wed, 26 Jul 2023 at 12:23, Dom Grigonis via Python-list wrote: > print(a + 1)# TypeError: unsupported operand type(s) for +: 'A' > and 'int' > > Is there a way to achieve it without actually implementing operators? > I have looked at Proxy objects, but they do not seem suited to

Fallback for operator and other dunder methods

2023-07-25 Thread Dom Grigonis via Python-list
To illustrate what I was trying to achieve: class A: def __init__(self, arr): self.arr = arr def __getattr__(self, name): arr_method = getattr(self.arr, name) def wrapper(*args, **kwargs): new_arr = arr_method(*args, **kwargs) return