Ray Cote wrote:
At 5:07 PM +0100 2/27/06, Magnus Lycka wrote:
SNIP
I'm still interested
in experiences from Pythonistas using Firebird--
especially embedded.
Works great.
Python and Firebird embedded (at least on Windows) is very simple to use.
Not currently using it on other
Claudio Grondi wrote:
Do I understand it right, that I can use Firebird database in the same
way as I can use the Berkeley one provided in Python standard distribution?
That depends on what you mean by the same way...
As with Berkeley, you can use it in-process, and don't need a
separate
All the info you need is in the kinterbasdb module. I've worked with it
under windows and Linux and... it just works. Really well indeed. I'd
recommend it a lot.
http://kinterbasdb.sourceforge.net/dist_docs/usage.html#faq_fep_embedded_using_with
--
Asier.
--
haxier wrote:
All the info you need is in the kinterbasdb module. I've worked with it
under windows and Linux and... it just works. Really well indeed. I'd
recommend it a lot.
http://kinterbasdb.sourceforge.net/dist_docs/usage.html#faq_fep_embedded_using_with
--
Asier.
Thanks - you
Jarek Zgoda wrote:
They just hired Jim Starkey. Perhaps MySQL AB hopes he will write a
transactional engine for MySQL, as he previously wrote one for Interbase
(which is known to be one of the best a man could imagine).
Anyway, we got far off topic, so we better go somewhere else.
Ok, to
At 5:07 PM +0100 2/27/06, Magnus Lycka wrote:
SNIP
I'm still interested
in experiences from Pythonistas using Firebird--
especially embedded.
Works great.
Python and Firebird embedded (at least on Windows) is very simple to use.
Not currently using it on other platforms.
--Ray
--
Raymond
