On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 21:02:20 + (UTC), Karlo Lozovina [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (=?utf-8?Q?Bj=C3=B6rn_Lindstr=C3=B6m?=) wrote in
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
If you need it to be SQL-like, SQLite seems to be the right thing.
Tried that one, but had some problems setting
Karlo Lozovina wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (=?utf-8?Q?Bj=C3=B6rn_Lindstr=C3=B6m?=) wrote in
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
If you need it to be SQL-like, SQLite seems to be the right thing.
Tried that one, but had some problems setting things up. On the other
hand, BerkeleyDB + Pybsddb worked like
Karlo Lozovina wrote:
I've been Googling around for _small_, flat file (no server processes),
SQL-like database which can be easily access from Python.
Although it doesn't support SQL queries, Metakit
(http://www.equi4.com/metakit/python.html) is a very lightweight and
easy to use db with a
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005, Karlo Lozovina wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (=?utf-8?Q?Bj=C3=B6rn_Lindstr=C3=B6m?=) wrote in
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
If you need it to be SQL-like, SQLite seems to be the right thing.
Tried that one, but had some problems setting things up.
That is strange. SQLite +
Peter == Peter Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Karlo Lozovina wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (=?utf-8?Q?Bj=C3=B6rn_Lindstr=C3=B6m?=) wrote
in news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
If you need it to be SQL-like, SQLite seems to be the right thing.
Tried that one, but had some problems setting things up. On
Peter Hansen wrote:
Karlo Lozovina wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (=?utf-8?Q?Bj=C3=B6rn_Lindstr=C3=B6m?=) wrote in
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
If you need it to be SQL-like, SQLite seems to be the right thing.
Tried that one, but had some problems setting things up. On the other
hand, BerkeleyDB +
Karlo Lozovina wrote:
I've been Googling around for _small_, flat file (no server processes),
SQL-like database which can be easily access from Python.
There are some suggestions in my EPC 2004 DB presentation:
http://www.thinkware.se/epc2004db/epc04_mly_db.pdf
--
Steve Holden wrote:
My experience on Cygwin was that I had to install sqlite before pySqlite
worked.
So although the Windows install of Pysqlite bundles a .pyd that includes
the statically linked sqlite library, other platforms do not? I agree
that would represent a potentially annoying
I've been Googling around for _small_, flat file (no server processes),
SQL-like database which can be easily access from Python. Speed and
perforamnce are of no issue, most important is that all data is contained
within single file and no server binary has to run in order to use the
dbase.
Karlo Lozovina [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've been Googling around for _small_, flat file (no server
processes), SQL-like database which can be easily access from Python.
If you need it to be SQL-like, SQLite seems to be the right thing.
It's not clear to me what you mean by flat file here,
Karlo Lozovina wrote:
I've been Googling around for _small_, flat file (no server processes),
SQL-like database which can be easily access from Python. Speed and
perforamnce are of no issue, most important is that all data is contained
within single file and no server binary has to run in
On Nov 01, Karlo Lozovina wrote:
I've been Googling around for _small_, flat file (no server
processes), SQL-like database which can be easily access from
Python. Speed and perforamnce are of no issue, most important is
that all data is contained within single file and no server binary
has to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (=?utf-8?Q?Bj=C3=B6rn_Lindstr=C3=B6m?=) wrote in
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
If you need it to be SQL-like, SQLite seems to be the right thing.
Tried that one, but had some problems setting things up. On the other
hand, BerkeleyDB + Pybsddb worked like a charm, with no setting
13 matches
Mail list logo
