W. eWatson wolftra...@invalid.com writes:
See my post about the datetime controversy about 3-4 posts up from
yours.
This forum is distributed, and there's no “up” or “3-4 messages” that is
common for all readers.
Could you give the Message-ID for that message?
--
\ “As we enjoy great
Alf P. Steinbach wrote:
* Steve Holden:
Alf P. Steinbach wrote:
* W. eWatson:
Ben Finney wrote:
W. eWatson wolftra...@invalid.com writes:
See my post about the datetime controversy about 3-4 posts up from
yours.
This forum is distributed, and there's no “up” or “3-4 messages”
that is
W. eWatson wrote:
cut
now = datetime.datetime.now()
fractional_hour = now.hour + now.minute / 60.0
See my post about the datetime controversy about 3-4 posts up from yours.
If timezones might be a problem area, than it might be worth while to
see it in the context of the actual
Ben Finney wrote:
Alf P. Steinbach al...@start.no writes:
And considering this, and the fact that Google's archive is now the
main Usenet archive, message id's are not that useful, really.
You've demonstrated only that Google is an unreliable Usenet archive.
One doesn't even need to use
W. eWatson wrote:
Maybe there's a more elegant way to do this. I want to express the
result of datetime.datetime.now() in fractional hours.
Here's one way.
dt=datetime.datetime.now()
xtup = dt.timetuple()
h = xtup[3]+xtup[4]/60.0+xtup[5]/3600.00+xtup[6]/10**6
# now is in fractions of
W. eWatson wrote:
Maybe there's a more elegant way to do this. I want to express the
result of datetime.datetime.now() in fractional hours.
Here's one way.
dt=datetime.datetime.now()
xtup = dt.timetuple()
h = xtup[3]+xtup[4]/60.0+xtup[5]/3600.00+xtup[6]/10**6
# now is in fractions of an hour
Martin P. Hellwig wrote:
W. eWatson wrote:
Maybe there's a more elegant way to do this. I want to express the
result of datetime.datetime.now() in fractional hours.
Here's one way.
dt=datetime.datetime.now()
xtup = dt.timetuple()
h = xtup[3]+xtup[4]/60.0+xtup[5]/3600.00+xtup[6]/10**6
# now
Austyn wrote:
Here's an improvement in case you want your code to work outside of
Arizona:
from time import time, timezone
h = ((time() - timezone) / 3600) % 24
On Jan 10, 9:04 pm, Austyn aus...@gmail.com wrote:
How about:
import time
arizona_utc_offset = -7.00
h = (time.time() / 3600 +
Martin P. Hellwig wrote:
Martin P. Hellwig wrote:
W. eWatson wrote:
Maybe there's a more elegant way to do this. I want to express the
result of datetime.datetime.now() in fractional hours.
Here's one way.
dt=datetime.datetime.now()
xtup = dt.timetuple()
h =
Martin P. Hellwig wrote:
Martin P. Hellwig wrote:
W. eWatson wrote:
Maybe there's a more elegant way to do this. I want to express the
result of datetime.datetime.now() in fractional hours.
Here's one way.
dt=datetime.datetime.now()
xtup = dt.timetuple()
h =
Ben Finney wrote:
W. eWatson wolftra...@invalid.com writes:
See my post about the datetime controversy about 3-4 posts up from
yours.
This forum is distributed, and there's no “up” or “3-4 messages” that is
common for all readers.
Could you give the Message-ID for that message?
Sort of
W. eWatson wolftra...@invalid.com writes:
Ben Finney wrote:
Could you give the Message-ID for that message?
Sort of like outer space I guess. No real direction. How would I find
the message ID?
It is a field in the header of every message. Show the full header, and
look for the field
* W. eWatson:
Ben Finney wrote:
W. eWatson wolftra...@invalid.com writes:
See my post about the datetime controversy about 3-4 posts up from
yours.
This forum is distributed, and there's no “up” or “3-4 messages” that is
common for all readers.
Could you give the Message-ID for that
Alf P. Steinbach wrote:
* W. eWatson:
Ben Finney wrote:
W. eWatson wolftra...@invalid.com writes:
See my post about the datetime controversy about 3-4 posts up from
yours.
This forum is distributed, and there's no “up” or “3-4 messages” that is
common for all readers.
Could you give the
Alf P. Steinbach al...@start.no writes:
And considering this, and the fact that Google's archive is now the
main Usenet archive, message id's are not that useful, really.
You've demonstrated only that Google is an unreliable Usenet archive.
One doesn't even need to use Usenet, in this case,
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 10:26 PM, Ben Finney ben+pyt...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
Alf P. Steinbach al...@start.no writes:
And considering this, and the fact that Google's archive is now the
main Usenet archive, message id's are not that useful, really.
You've demonstrated only that Google is an
* Steve Holden:
Alf P. Steinbach wrote:
* W. eWatson:
Ben Finney wrote:
W. eWatson wolftra...@invalid.com writes:
See my post about the datetime controversy about 3-4 posts up from
yours.
This forum is distributed, and there's no “up” or “3-4 messages” that is
common for all readers.
Maybe there's a more elegant way to do this. I want to express the
result of datetime.datetime.now() in fractional hours.
Here's one way.
dt=datetime.datetime.now()
xtup = dt.timetuple()
h = xtup[3]+xtup[4]/60.0+xtup[5]/3600.00+xtup[6]/10**6
# now is in fractions of an hour
--
How about:
import time
arizona_utc_offset = -7.00
h = (time.time() / 3600 + arizona_utc_offset) % 24
dt.timetuple()[6] is the day of the week; struct tm_time doesn't
include a sub-second field.
On Jan 10, 10:28 am, W. eWatson wolftra...@invalid.com wrote:
Maybe there's a more elegant way to do
Here's an improvement in case you want your code to work outside of
Arizona:
from time import time, timezone
h = ((time() - timezone) / 3600) % 24
On Jan 10, 9:04 pm, Austyn aus...@gmail.com wrote:
How about:
import time
arizona_utc_offset = -7.00
h = (time.time() / 3600 +
20 matches
Mail list logo
