En Wed, 23 Jan 2008 10:40:14 -0200, Alnilam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> Skipping past html validation, and html to xhtml 'cleaning', and
> instead starting with the assumption that I have files that are valid
> XHTML, can anyone give me a good example of how I would use _ htmllib,
> HTMLParser
On Jan 23, 2008 7:40 AM, Alnilam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Skipping past html validation, and html to xhtml 'cleaning', and
> instead starting with the assumption that I have files that are valid
> XHTML, can anyone give me a good example of how I would use _ htmllib,
> HTMLParser, or ElementTre
On Jan 23, 3:54 am, "M.-A. Lemburg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I was asking this community if there was a simple way to use only the
> >> tools included with Python to parse a bit of html.
>
> There are lots of ways doing HTML parsing in Python. A common
> one is e.g. using mxTidy to convert
> The pages I'm trying to write this code to run against aren't in the
> wild, though. They are static html files on my company's lan, are very
> consistent in format, and are (I believe) valid html.
Obvious way to check this is to go to http://validator.w3.org/ and see
what it tells you about you
On 2008-01-23 01:29, Gabriel Genellina wrote:
> En Tue, 22 Jan 2008 19:20:32 -0200, Alnilam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
>
>> On Jan 22, 11:39 am, "Diez B. Roggisch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Alnilam wrote:
On Jan 22, 8:44 am, Alnilam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Pardon me, but the
On Jan 22, 7:29 pm, "Gabriel Genellina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> > I was asking this community if there was a simple way to use only the
> > tools included with Python to parse a bit of html.
>
> If you *know* that your document is valid HTML, you can use the HTMLParser
> module in the stan
On Jan 22, 7:29 pm, "Gabriel Genellina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> > I was asking this community if there was a simple way to use only the
> > tools included with Python to parse a bit of html.
>
> If you *know* that your document is valid HTML, you can use the HTMLParser
> module in the stand
En Tue, 22 Jan 2008 19:20:32 -0200, Alnilam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> On Jan 22, 11:39 am, "Diez B. Roggisch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Alnilam wrote:
>> > On Jan 22, 8:44 am, Alnilam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> > Pardon me, but the standard issue Python 2.n (for n in range(5, 2,
>>
On Jan 22, 11:39 am, "Diez B. Roggisch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alnilam wrote:
> > On Jan 22, 8:44 am, Alnilam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > Pardon me, but the standard issue Python 2.n (for n in range(5, 2,
> >> > -1)) doesn't have an xml.dom.ext ... you must have the mega-monstrous
> >>
Alnilam wrote:
> On Jan 22, 8:44 am, Alnilam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Pardon me, but the standard issue Python 2.n (for n in range(5, 2,
>> > -1)) doesn't have an xml.dom.ext ... you must have the mega-monstrous
>> > 200-modules PyXML package installed. And you don't want the 75Kb
>> > Beau
On Jan 22, 8:44 am, Alnilam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Pardon me, but the standard issue Python 2.n (for n in range(5, 2,
> > -1)) doesn't have an xml.dom.ext ... you must have the mega-monstrous
> > 200-modules PyXML package installed. And you don't want the 75Kb
> > BeautifulSoup?
>
> I wasn'
On Jan 22, 7:44 am, Alnilam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...I move from computer to
> computer regularly, and while all have a recent copy of Python, each
> has different (or no) extra modules, and I don't always have the
> luxury of downloading extras. That being said, if there's a simple way
> of
> Pardon me, but the standard issue Python 2.n (for n in range(5, 2,
> -1)) doesn't have an xml.dom.ext ... you must have the mega-monstrous
> 200-modules PyXML package installed. And you don't want the 75Kb
> BeautifulSoup?
I wasn't aware that I had PyXML installed, and can't find a reference
to
On 22 Jan, 06:31, Alnilam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry for the noob question, but I've gone through the documentation
> on python.org, tried some of the diveintopython and boddie's examples,
> and looked through some of the numerous posts in this group on the
> subject and I'm still rather co
On Jan 22, 4:31 pm, Alnilam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry for the noob question, but I've gone through the documentation
> on python.org, tried some of the diveintopython and boddie's examples,
> and looked through some of the numerous posts in this group on the
> subject and I'm still rather
Sorry for the noob question, but I've gone through the documentation
on python.org, tried some of the diveintopython and boddie's examples,
and looked through some of the numerous posts in this group on the
subject and I'm still rather confused. I know that there are some
great tools out there for
16 matches
Mail list logo
