Chris Torek wrote:
Since it is a generator that only requests another line when called,
it should be fine
Is it, then, that until the new itaration, the callee is on pause?
--
goto /dev/null
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Chris Torek wrote:
In at least some versions of Python 2
I'm with P3k :P. However thank you for your guidelines.
Last my attempt was to use a *for* p.wait() , as mentioned earlier
That looks good enough. I noted some little delay for the first lines,
mostly sure Popen assign some buffer even
Chris Torek wrote:
In at least some versions of Python 2
[the file-type object iterators behave badly with pipes]
(This may still be true in Python 3, I just have no experience with
Py3k. At least some version of Python 2 means the ones I have
access to, and have tried. :-) )
In article
Tim Roberts wrote:
Are you specifying a buffer size in the Popen command? If not, then the
Python side of things is unbuffered
The buffer is as per default. The program reports one line around 1/2 second
time.
I think I'll look into the option as Nobody states:
p =
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 3:02 AM, TheSaint nob...@nowhere.net.no wrote:
Tim Roberts wrote:
Are you specifying a buffer size in the Popen command? If not, then the
Python side of things is unbuffered
The buffer is as per default. The program reports one line around 1/2 second
time.
I think
Chris Rebert wrote:
What do you mean by on-the-fly in this context
I just suppose to elaborate the latest line, as soon it's written on the
pipe, and print some result on the screen.
Imaging something like
p= Popen(['ping','-c40','www.google.com'], stdout=PIPE)
for line in p.stdout:
TheSaint wrote:
I just suppose to elaborate the latest line, as soon it's written on the
pipe, and print some result on the screen.
I think some info is also here:
http://alexandredeverteuil.blogspot.com/
--
goto /dev/null
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
In article irtj2o$h0m$1...@speranza.aioe.org
TheSaint nob...@nowhere.net.no wrote:
Chris Rebert wrote:
I just suppose to elaborate the latest line, as soon it's written on the
pipe, and print some result on the screen.
Imaging something like
p= Popen(['ping','-c40','www.google.com'],
Hello.
I'm looking into subprocess.Popen docs.
I've launch the program with its arguments and that's smooth. I'm expecting
to read the output by *comunicate()* at every line that prgram may blow
during the process, but the output is given only when the child process is
ended.
I'd like to
On Sun, 29 May 2011 00:01:56 +0800, TheSaint wrote:
I'm looking into subprocess.Popen docs. I've launch the program with its
arguments and that's smooth. I'm expecting to read the output by
*comunicate()* at every line that prgram may blow during the process, but
the output is given only when
TheSaint nob...@nowhere.net.no wrote:
I'm looking into subprocess.Popen docs.
I've launch the program with its arguments and that's smooth. I'm expecting
to read the output by *comunicate()* at every line that prgram may blow
during the process, but the output is given only when the child
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 4:32 PM, Tim Roberts t...@probo.com wrote:
TheSaint nob...@nowhere.net.no wrote:
I'm looking into subprocess.Popen docs.
I've launch the program with its arguments and that's smooth. I'm
expecting
to read the output by *comunicate()* at every line that prgram may
12 matches
Mail list logo
