On 10/02/2018 12:48 AM, Ethan Furman wrote:
> Even for two-person, private email discussions I prefer the interleaved
> replies -- in a week when I have to remind myself what was discussed it
> is much easier to comprehend.
Absolutely. I've been saved from embarrassment countless times because
w
On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 12:05 AM Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2 Oct 2018 10:17:27 +0800, Jach Fong
> declaimed the following:
>
>
> >It was supposed that most discussant want to see the reply message
> >instantly when they open the mail. They already know what is going on
> >and no need to
On 10/01/2018 11:10 PM, Christian Gollwitzer wrote:
Am 02.10.18 um 04:17 schrieb Jach Fong:
It was supposed that most discussant want to see the reply message
instantly when they open the mail. They already know what is going on
and no need to pass through all those previous message. "top post
Am 02.10.18 um 04:17 schrieb Jach Fong:
It was supposed that most discussant want to see the reply message
instantly when they open the mail. They already know what is going on
and no need to pass through all those previous message. "top posting"
seems more reasonable to me:-)
You assume that e
> On Oct 1, 2018, at 10:17 PM, Jach Fong wrote:
>
> Thanks for your info about how Windows supports the forward slash.
>
> I don't quit sure what is the meaning of "top posting" in your mail.
> If its meaning (forgive me if I was wrong) is where the reply was put
> in mail, I have reason of st
Thanks for your info about how Windows supports the forward slash.
I don't quit sure what is the meaning of "top posting" in your mail.
If its meaning (forgive me if I was wrong) is where the reply was put
in mail, I have reason of standing on the opposite side.
It was supposed that most discuss
On 01/10/2018 10:19, Jach Fong wrote:
Hmmm...strange, I didn't see Rick's mail:-(
Sure the forward slash is better, not to cause this confusion.
But I am curious, since when, I mean, since which version
Windows start to accept forward slash?
First, stop top posting.
Second, ISTR that all Win
On 2018-10-01 17:19:25 +0800, Jach Fong wrote:
> Sure the forward slash is better, not to cause this confusion.
> But I am curious, since when, I mean, since which version
> Windows start to accept forward slash?
Since MS-DOS 2.0, i.e., before Windows even existed. Note that this is
only true for
On 2018-10-01 11:19, Jach Fong wrote:
> Hmmm...strange, I didn't see Rick's mail:-(
That's because he's banned from the list, but still around on the newsgroup
> Sure the forward slash is better, not to cause this confusion.
> But I am curious, since when, I mean, since which version
> Windows st
Hmmm...strange, I didn't see Rick's mail:-(
Sure the forward slash is better, not to cause this confusion.
But I am curious, since when, I mean, since which version
Windows start to accept forward slash?
--Jach
Alister ware via Python-list at 2018/10/1 PM 04:15 wrote:
On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 17:45
On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 17:45:52 -0700, Rick Johnson wrote:
> Jach Fong wrote:
>> I get a string item, for example path[0], from path =
>> os.get_exec_path()
>> It's something like "\\Borland\\Bcc55\\Include", a Python string.
>> I want to use this "string" in a subprocess command as a parameter.
>> O
Yes, you are right, it's just the way Python display the '\'.
Thank you.
Gregory Ewing at 2018/9/28 PM 02:02 wrote:
Jach Fong wrote:
I get a string item, for example path[0], from path = os.get_exec_path()
It's something like "\\Borland\\Bcc55\\Include"
It doesn't actually have double backsla
Jach Fong wrote:
I get a string item, for example path[0], from path = os.get_exec_path()
It's something like "\\Borland\\Bcc55\\Include"
It doesn't actually have double backslashes in it, that's just a
result of how the string is being displayed. No conversion is
needed.
--
Greg
--
https://ma
I get a string item, for example path[0], from path = os.get_exec_path()
It's something like "\\Borland\\Bcc55\\Include", a Python string.
I want to use this "string" in a subprocess command as a parameter.
Obviously this command can only recognize "\Borland\Bcc55\Include".
I know there must have
14 matches
Mail list logo