> On 21 Dec 2022, at 17:06, Chris Angelico wrote:
>
> On Thu, 22 Dec 2022 at 03:58, gene heskett wrote:
>>
>>> On 12/21/22 11:22, Chris Angelico wrote:
>>> On Thu, 22 Dec 2022 at 03:11, Stefan Ram wrote:
Lars Liedtke writes:
> Or you could have "native" bash ($SHELL) with
On Thu, 22 Dec 2022 at 04:12, Barry wrote:
> I see bash scripts that are 1000’s of line of code at work and its a
> maintenance nightmare.
>
> Knowing when to make the move from “handy bash script” to “this is a
> production application” and needs to be python is what I see people miss.
>
>
On Thu, 22 Dec 2022 at 03:58, gene heskett wrote:
>
> On 12/21/22 11:22, Chris Angelico wrote:
> > On Thu, 22 Dec 2022 at 03:11, Stefan Ram wrote:
> >>
> >> Lars Liedtke writes:
> >>> Or you could have "native" bash ($SHELL) with WSL.
> >>
> >>In this newsgroup, it would actually be obvious
On 12/21/22 11:22, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Thu, 22 Dec 2022 at 03:11, Stefan Ram wrote:
Lars Liedtke writes:
Or you could have "native" bash ($SHELL) with WSL.
In this newsgroup, it would actually be obvious to use Python.
Less obvious than you might think - partly because bash is
