Yes, Digital Mars D is what I was referring to and yes I know D is not
as efficient as C++. If I knew of a good C++ compiler that is not
from Microsoft that works natively with Windows I would be happy to
consider using it.
I've had good luck with MinGW (gcc compiled for windows).
On Fri, 21 Sep 2007 16:25:20 -0700, Python Maniac wrote:
On Sep 21, 3:02 pm, Matt McCredie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Isn't D compiled to machine code? I would expect it to win hands down.
That is, unless it is horribly unoptimized.
Well D code is compiled into machine code that runs via a
On Sep 21, 11:39 pm, Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 21 Sep 2007 16:25:20 -0700, Python Maniac wrote:
On Sep 21, 3:02 pm, Matt McCredie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Isn't D compiled to machine code? I would expect it to win hands down.
That is, unless it is horribly
On Sep 21, 12:56 am, Duncan Booth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
George Sakkis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It has to do with the input string length; try multiplying it by 10 or
100. Below is a more complete benchmark; for largish strings, the imap
version is the fastest among those using the
On Sat, 22 Sep 2007 13:00:27 -0700, Python Maniac wrote:
On Sep 21, 11:39 pm, Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 21 Sep 2007 16:25:20 -0700, Python Maniac wrote:
Well D code is compiled into machine code that runs via a VM.
About which D are we talking here? Not
On Sep 20, 7:13 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 20, 5:46 pm, Paul Hankin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 20, 10:59 pm, Python Maniac [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am new to Python however I would like some feedback from those who
know more about Python than I do at
George Sakkis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It has to do with the input string length; try multiplying it by 10 or
100. Below is a more complete benchmark; for largish strings, the imap
version is the fastest among those using the original algorithm. Of
course using a lookup table as Diez showed
On Sep 21, 12:56 am, Duncan Booth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
George Sakkis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It has to do with the input string length; try multiplying it by 10 or
100. Below is a more complete benchmark; for largish strings, the imap
version is the fastest among those using the
On Sep 21, 1:00 pm, Python Maniac [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My best runtime with Ruby using the same machine and OS was 67.797
secs which is 29.8x slower than the fastest Python runtime. This
makes Ruby almost as slow as Python was made faster. The irony with
Ruby was that the use of a hash
Now I think I will code this little scrambler using nothing but the D
Language just to see whether there is any benefit in using D over
Python for this sort of problem.
Isn't D compiled to machine code? I would expect it to win hands down.
That is, unless it is horribly unoptimized.
Matt
--
On Sep 21, 3:02 pm, Matt McCredie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now I think I will code this little scrambler using nothing but the D
Language just to see whether there is any benefit in using D over
Python for this sort of problem.
Isn't D compiled to machine code? I would expect it to win
It would be nice if Python could be made to automatically detect the
LC and string translation patterns used by the unoptimized Python code
and make them into optimized Python code on the fly at runtime. I am
more than a little amazed nobody has chosen to build a JIT (Just In-
Time compiler)
On Sep 21, 4:48 pm, Matt McCredie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It would be nice if Python could be made to automatically detect the
LC and string translation patterns used by the unoptimized Python code
and make them into optimized Python code on the fly at runtime. I am
more than a little
I am new to Python however I would like some feedback from those who
know more about Python than I do at this time.
def scrambleLine(line):
s = ''
for c in line:
s += chr(ord(c) | 0x80)
return s
def descrambleLine(line):
s = ''
for c in line:
s += chr(ord(c)
On Sep 20, 10:59 pm, Python Maniac [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am new to Python however I would like some feedback from those who
know more about Python than I do at this time.
def scrambleLine(line):
s = ''
for c in line:
s += chr(ord(c) | 0x80)
return s
def
On 9/20/07, Python Maniac [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am new to Python however I would like some feedback from those who
know more about Python than I do at this time.
Well, you could save some time by not applying the scramble one line
at a time (that is if you don't mind losing the line
Python Maniac schrieb:
I am new to Python however I would like some feedback from those who
know more about Python than I do at this time.
def scrambleLine(line):
s = ''
for c in line:
s += chr(ord(c) | 0x80)
return s
def descrambleLine(line):
s = ''
for c
On 21/09/2007, Tim Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 20/09/2007, Python Maniac [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am new to Python however I would like some feedback from those who
know more about Python than I do at this time.
def scrambleLine(line):
s = ''
for c in line:
s
Python Maniac wrote:
I am new to Python however I would like some feedback from those who
know more about Python than I do at this time.
def scrambleLine(line):
s = ''
for c in line:
s += chr(ord(c) | 0x80)
return s
def descrambleLine(line):
s = ''
for c
On Sep 20, 3:57 pm, Matt McCredie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/20/07, Python Maniac [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am new to Python however I would like some feedback from those who
know more about Python than I do at this time.
Well, you could save some time by not applying the scramble one
On Sep 20, 5:46 pm, Paul Hankin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 20, 10:59 pm, Python Maniac [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am new to Python however I would like some feedback from those who
know more about Python than I do at this time.
def scrambleLine(line):
s = ''
for c in
On 20/09/2007, Python Maniac [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am new to Python however I would like some feedback from those who
know more about Python than I do at this time.
def scrambleLine(line):
s = ''
for c in line:
s += chr(ord(c) | 0x80)
return s
def
Python Maniac [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am new to Python however I would like some feedback from those who
know more about Python than I do at this time.
Use the array module and do 32-bit or 64-bit operations with it.
See http://nightsong.com/phr/crypto/p3.py for a more serious
encryption
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 20, 5:46 pm, Paul Hankin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 20, 10:59 pm, Python Maniac [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am new to Python however I would like some feedback from those who
know more about Python than I do at this time.
def scrambleLine(line):
s =
On Sep 20, 7:13 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How come it's not? Then I noticed you don't have brackets in
the join statement. So I tried without them and got
If memory serves me right newer versions of python will recognize and
optimize string concatenation via the +=
25 matches
Mail list logo
