kj wrote:
>
>Thanks, but the last bit of your post ("...most of which have the
>ability to run by themselves") makes me wonder whether we mean the
>same thing when we talk of "scripts." Can you give me an example
>of a script that *does not* have the ability to run by itself?
>When I use the word
On Sat, 09 May 2009 17:09:38 +0100, kj wrote:
I know that in the python world the distinction between a script
and a (library) module is not so clear-cut, and it is common for
library modules to have "top-level" stuff (typically test code)
that gets run if the module is invoked directly from th
In <802a051qoqmpnih0j2su9hhriqumagu...@4ax.com> Tim Roberts
writes:
>kj wrote:
>>
>>I'm learning python, for the umpteenth time. This time I decided
>>to start out by writing Python scripts for everyday tasks. Most
>>of these scripts are meant to be used only once or twice, but a
>>few of the
kj wrote:
>
>I'm learning python, for the umpteenth time. This time I decided
>to start out by writing Python scripts for everyday tasks. Most
>of these scripts are meant to be used only once or twice, but a
>few of them have become useful enough that I'd like to make them
>a little bit more sol
I'm learning python, for the umpteenth time. This time I decided
to start out by writing Python scripts for everyday tasks. Most
of these scripts are meant to be used only once or twice, but a
few of them have become useful enough that I'd like to make them
a little bit more solid...
I'd like
