On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 6:10 AM, Stefan Ram wrote:
> Rustom Mody writes:
>>Useful python programs are often small; even tiny
>
> We must not forget that tiny programs are just large
> problems with the size masterfully hidden.
>
> For example, the »print« of Python is actually implemented
>
I like this trajectory of conversation.
Can we re define "small tiny" as "scripts"?
i can argue, based on my expirience with other languages, that there is no
need for an "ide". The most ive ever needed is a text editor and a few
plugins with "print".
Moving to "average" size projects.
What i fou
On Saturday, October 28, 2017 at 4:46:03 PM UTC+5:30, Christian Gollwitzer
wrote:
> Am 28.10.17 um 09:04 schrieb Rustom Mody:
> > [The other day I was writing a program to split alternate lines of a file;
> > Apart from file-handling it was these two lines:
> >
> > for x in lines[0::2]: pr
Am 28.10.17 um 09:04 schrieb Rustom Mody:
[The other day I was writing a program to split alternate lines of a file;
Apart from file-handling it was these two lines:
for x in lines[0::2]: print(x.strip())
for x in lines[1::2]: print(x.strip())
]
...and using the best(TM) tool for
On Saturday, October 28, 2017 at 11:59:14 AM UTC+5:30, Andrew Z wrote:
> Yeah, lets start the war!
> // joking!
>
> But if i think about it... there are tons articles and flame wars about "a
> vs b".
> And yet, what if the question should be different:
>
> If you were to create the "ide" for your
Yeah, lets start the war!
// joking!
But if i think about it... there are tons articles and flame wars about "a
vs b".
And yet, what if the question should be different:
If you were to create the "ide" for yourself (think lego) , what are the
functions that you _use_ and like a lot?
--
https://m
