On 11/20/2010 4:59 PM Steven D'Aprano said...
On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 08:59:30 +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
C'mon, Steven, you know the drill. If you want us to help you solve a
problem, don't start with “I want to use this behaviour that seems
loony, and I won't say why”. Instead, help us by telling u
Steven D'Aprano writes:
> I have a bunch of related functions and objects which are private to a
> module, with a single public function that acts as the API to those
> functions. I'd like to have these private functions in a namespace,
> separate from the rest of the module. Ignore the fact that
On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 08:59:30 +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
> C'mon, Steven, you know the drill. If you want us to help you solve a
> problem, don't start with “I want to use this behaviour that seems
> loony, and I won't say why”. Instead, help us by telling us what problem
> you're trying to solve.
W
Steven D'Aprano writes:
> I also understand that the usual way of getting this would be to
> return self.x or self.__class__.x from method, instead of x. Again,
> normally I would do this.
>
> But in this specific case I have reasons for wanting to avoid both of
> the normal behaviours. Do not ju
On 11/20/2010 6:59 AM Steven D'Aprano said...
I find myself having need of a class where the class scope is included in
the scope of methods in the class. A simple example from Python 3.1:
x = "outside"
class Magic:
x = "inside"
def method(self):
return x
I would like Magic
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>I find myself having need of a class where the class scope is included in
>the scope of methods in the class. A simple example from Python 3.1:
>
>x = "outside"
>
>class Magic:
>x = "inside"
>def method(self):
>return x
>
>
>I would like Magic().method() t
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> But in this specific case I have reasons for wanting to avoid both of
> the normal behaviours. Do not judge me, please accept that I have a
> good reason for wanting this, or at least allow me to shoot myself in
> the foot this way *wink*. In Python 3, is there some way t
I find myself having need of a class where the class scope is included in
the scope of methods in the class. A simple example from Python 3.1:
x = "outside"
class Magic:
x = "inside"
def method(self):
return x
I would like Magic().method() to return "inside" rather than "outsid
