I'm interested in making sh.py more accessible to help bring Python forward
in the area of shell scripting, so I'm interested in seeing if sh would be
suitable for the standard library. Is there any other interest in something
like this?
Pretty slick. My only concern is portability, are
On 2012-10-21 16:59:16 +, Dennis Lee Bieber said:
On Sun, 21 Oct 2012 07:41:52 -0600, Jason Friedman ja...@powerpull.net
declaimed the following in gmane.comp.python.general:
Pretty slick. My only concern is portability, are there other
examples of modules (excepting Win32) that work on
Hi,
I'm the author of sh.py, a subprocess module rewrite for Linux and OSX. It
serves as a powerful and intuitive interface to launching subprocesses
http://amoffat.github.com/sh/. It has been maintained on github
https://github.com/amoffat/sh for about 10 months and currently has about
25k
