Michael Spencer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I agree: I use Thunderbird, and it works well. But I read NNTP
> newsgroups on several devices, and I would really like to have the
> read-status synchronized across them.
> Can anyone recommend a solution that also synchronizes post read
> status?
I
Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 11:36:44 -0800, Michael Spencer
>>
>> Can anyone recommend a solution that also synchronizes post read status? If
>> Google Reader or something like it handled NNTP, I imagine I'd use it to
>> achieve
>> this benefit.
>>
> Unlike email client
Ben Finney wrote:
>
> I'm not interested in learning some centralised web-application
> interface, and far prefer the discussion forum to be available by a
> standard *protocol*, that I can use my choice of *local client*
> application with.
>
I agree: I use Thunderbird, and it works well. But
On 30/11/2007, Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Dotan Cohen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On 29/11/2007, Dennis Lee Bieber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Regardless of what Google/Yahoo/M$/AOL want you to think,
> > > using a web-based mail client is typically the worst way t
On 2007-11-30, Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Most of the high-volume discussion lists I participate in are made
> available as NNTP forums via news.gmane.org. I find that immeasurably
> superior to any email interface, not least because I can use *any*
> NNTP client to manage my interact
"Dotan Cohen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 29/11/2007, Dennis Lee Bieber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Regardless of what Google/Yahoo/M$/AOL want you to think,
> > using a web-based mail client is typically the worst way to follow
> > mailing lists and/or news-groups; much better to
