On 2020-05-28 20:51:59 -0400, Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 5/28/2020 5:20 PM, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
[The final "security-only" releases are source-only]
> > This seems a rather odd policy to me.
>
> Not if one considers the intended users.
> Do you prefer we not make these releases?
No, of couse
On Friday, May 29, 2020 at 7:30:32 AM UTC-5, Eryk Sun wrote:
> On 5/28/20, Adam Preble wrote:
> Sometimes a user will open a script via "open with" and browse to
> python.exe or py.exe. This associates .py files with a new progid that
> doesn't pass the %* command-line arguments.
>
> The
On 5/28/20 3:20 PM, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
> On 2020-05-23 13:22:26 -0600, Mats Wichmann wrote:
>> On 5/23/20 12:23 AM, Adam Preble wrote:
>>> I wanted to update from 3.6.8 on Windows without necessarily moving
>>> on to 3.7+ (yet), so I thought I'd try 3.6.9 or 3.6.10.
>>>
>>> All I see for both
On 5/28/20, Adam Preble wrote:
>
> We had found what looked like a bug in the Python Launcher where it would
> eat command line arguments meant for the script. I would find some stuff
> missing from sys.argv in a script that just imports sys and prints out
> sys.argv if I ran it directly in
On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 3:15 PM Mike Dewhirst wrote:
>
> On 29/05/2020 12:26 pm, Chris Angelico wrote:
> > On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 11:57 AM Mike Dewhirst
> > wrote:
> >> I am an example
> >>
> >> I installed all the Pythons on my Windows 10 dev machine (locked into
> >> Windows by having
On 29/05/2020 2:59 pm, Dieter Maurer wrote:
Mike Dewhirst wrote at 2020-5-29 11:55 +1000:
On 29/05/2020 10:51 am, Terry Reedy wrote:
...
Source only releases only block Windows/Mac users who choose not to
upgrade to a released installer and who cannot or choose not to compile.
I am an example
On 29/05/2020 12:26 pm, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 11:57 AM Mike Dewhirst wrote:
I am an example
I installed all the Pythons on my Windows 10 dev machine (locked into
Windows by having clients) but I'm also locked into Python 3.6.9 on my
Ubuntu 18.04 production machines.
Mike Dewhirst wrote at 2020-5-29 11:55 +1000:
>On 29/05/2020 10:51 am, Terry Reedy wrote:
> ...
>> Source only releases only block Windows/Mac users who choose not to
>> upgrade to a released installer and who cannot or choose not to compile.
>
>I am an example
>
>I installed all the Pythons on my
On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 1:46 PM Adam Preble wrote:
> I'm now concerned about how long we have with 3.6 because people clearly
> want us to move on even beyond that. I look online and the official support
> window for it ends at the end of next year, but it looks like the real
> support window for
On Thursday, May 28, 2020 at 7:57:04 PM UTC-5, Terry Reedy wrote:
> The OP is so far choosing to not use an installer with those fixes. By
> not doing so, he is missing out on the maybe 2000 non-security fixes and
> some enhancements that likely would benefit him more than maybe 50
> mostly
On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 11:57 AM Mike Dewhirst wrote:
>
> I am an example
>
> I installed all the Pythons on my Windows 10 dev machine (locked into
> Windows by having clients) but I'm also locked into Python 3.6.9 on my
> Ubuntu 18.04 production machines.
Be careful of assuming too much here.
On 29/05/2020 10:51 am, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 5/28/2020 5:20 PM, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
On 2020-05-23 13:22:26 -0600, Mats Wichmann wrote:
On 5/23/20 12:23 AM, Adam Preble wrote:
I wanted to update from 3.6.8 on Windows without necessarily moving
on to 3.7+ (yet), so I thought I'd try 3.6.9
On 5/28/2020 5:20 PM, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
On 2020-05-23 13:22:26 -0600, Mats Wichmann wrote:
On 5/23/20 12:23 AM, Adam Preble wrote:
I wanted to update from 3.6.8 on Windows without necessarily moving
on to 3.7+ (yet), so I thought I'd try 3.6.9 or 3.6.10.
All I see for both are source
On 2020-05-23 13:22:26 -0600, Mats Wichmann wrote:
> On 5/23/20 12:23 AM, Adam Preble wrote:
> > I wanted to update from 3.6.8 on Windows without necessarily moving
> > on to 3.7+ (yet), so I thought I'd try 3.6.9 or 3.6.10.
> >
> > All I see for both are source archives:
[...]
>
> During the
On 5/23/20 12:23 AM, Adam Preble wrote:
> I wanted to update from 3.6.8 on Windows without necessarily moving on to
> 3.7+ (yet), so I thought I'd try 3.6.9 or 3.6.10.
>
> All I see for both are source archives:
>
> https://www.python.org/downloads/release/python-369/
>
And that there are no files for an installer.
Souvik flutter dev
On Sat, May 23, 2020, 4:04 PM Souvik Dutta wrote:
> If you take a look at this page then you will find out that 3.6.10 was not
> intended to be used in windows...
> https://www.python.org/downloads/windows/
>
> Souvik flutter dev
If you take a look at this page then you will find out that 3.6.10 was not
intended to be used in windows... https://www.python.org/downloads/windows/
Souvik flutter dev
On Sat, May 23, 2020, 11:55 AM Adam Preble wrote:
> I wanted to update from 3.6.8 on Windows without necessarily moving on
I wanted to update from 3.6.8 on Windows without necessarily moving on to 3.7+
(yet), so I thought I'd try 3.6.9 or 3.6.10.
All I see for both are source archives:
https://www.python.org/downloads/release/python-369/
https://www.python.org/downloads/release/python-3610/
So, uh, I
18 matches
Mail list logo