On Sun, 1 Mar 2009, Terry Reedy wrote:
> John O'Hagan wrote:
> > Inspired by some recent threads here about using classes to extend the
> > behaviour of iterators, I'm trying to replace some some top-level
> > functions aimed at doing such things with a class.
> >
> > So far it's got a test for emp
En Mon, 02 Mar 2009 06:48:02 -0200, Lie Ryan escribió:
Gabriel Genellina wrote:
En Sun, 01 Mar 2009 15:51:07 -0200, Chris Rebert
escribió:
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 8:54 AM, Gabriel Genellina
wrote:
En Sun, 01 Mar 2009 13:20:28 -0200, John O'Hagan
escribió:
Inspired by some recent threads he
Gabriel Genellina wrote:
> En Sun, 01 Mar 2009 15:51:07 -0200, Chris Rebert
> escribió:
>> On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 8:54 AM, Gabriel Genellina
>> wrote:
>>> En Sun, 01 Mar 2009 13:20:28 -0200, John O'Hagan
>>>
>>> escribió:
>>>
Inspired by some recent threads here about using classes to exten
On Sun, 1 Mar 2009, Mark Tolonen wrote:
> "John O'Hagan" wrote in message
> news:200903011520.29405.resea...@johnohagan.com...
>
> > Inspired by some recent threads here about using classes to extend the
> > behaviour of iterators, I'm trying to replace some some top-level
> > functions
> > aimed
John O'Hagan wrote:
Inspired by some recent threads here about using classes to extend the
behaviour of iterators, I'm trying to replace some some top-level functions
aimed at doing such things with a class.
So far it's got a test for emptiness, a non-consuming peek-ahead method, and
an exten
En Sun, 01 Mar 2009 15:51:07 -0200, Chris Rebert
escribió:
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 8:54 AM, Gabriel Genellina
wrote:
En Sun, 01 Mar 2009 13:20:28 -0200, John O'Hagan
escribió:
Inspired by some recent threads here about using classes to extend the
behaviour of iterators, I'm trying to repl
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 8:54 AM, Gabriel Genellina
wrote:
> En Sun, 01 Mar 2009 13:20:28 -0200, John O'Hagan
> escribió:
>
>> Inspired by some recent threads here about using classes to extend the
>> behaviour of iterators, I'm trying to replace some some top-level
>> functions
>> aimed at doing s
En Sun, 01 Mar 2009 13:20:28 -0200, John O'Hagan
escribió:
Inspired by some recent threads here about using classes to extend the
behaviour of iterators, I'm trying to replace some some top-level
functions
aimed at doing such things with a class.
So far it's got a test for emptiness, a no
"John O'Hagan" wrote in message
news:200903011520.29405.resea...@johnohagan.com...
Inspired by some recent threads here about using classes to extend the
behaviour of iterators, I'm trying to replace some some top-level
functions
aimed at doing such things with a class.
So far it's got a te
Inspired by some recent threads here about using classes to extend the
behaviour of iterators, I'm trying to replace some some top-level functions
aimed at doing such things with a class.
So far it's got a test for emptiness, a non-consuming peek-ahead method, and
an extended next() which can r
10 matches
Mail list logo