>>45.9 mb
Yikes.
I keep all of my data files on a separate logical drive. I indexed only
that one. I'm going to try and figure a way to store the results of
os.walk(root) as a shelve, and then search it that way.
In the meantime, you might try the script we were playing with in the
previous thre
On my system, files.cache ended up being 45.9 Mb (800,000+ lines)!
Pretty fun script. I can imagine some interesting variations.
Thanks!
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
This script is COOL. It should be in the next cookbook. Maybe with some
tweaks and switches.
Thanks again.
Rick
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Adonis,
Cool! I'm on it.
Thanks again.
rpd
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
BartlebyScrivener wrote:
> How about one of these that works on Windows XP? I know there's no
> files.cache, but I wonder if your script could be combined with another
> function that would generate a list of paths on a Windows XP machine.
>
> Anyway, thanks for the script.
>
I wrote it on a Win
How about one of these that works on Windows XP? I know there's no
files.cache, but I wonder if your script could be combined with another
function that would generate a list of paths on a Windows XP machine.
Anyway, thanks for the script.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
mwt wrote:
> Is there a function in python that does what "locate" does in a bash
> shell?
>
> I know I could do it by using os.popen('locate'), but I'm curious if
> there's a Python "native" way to go about it. Only needs to work in
> Unix, but would be interesting if it was cross-platform.
>
>
Is there a function in python that does what "locate" does in a bash
shell?
I know I could do it by using os.popen('locate'), but I'm curious if
there's a Python "native" way to go about it. Only needs to work in
Unix, but would be interesting if it was cross-platform.
Thanks.
--
http://mail.p
