Where can I find a Python functionality like simulink ?
Stef,
I saw this at:
http://showmedo.com/videotutorials/video?name=743fromSeriesID=743
Ray
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Jul 27, 10:39 am, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 12:28 AM, Dotan Cohendotanco...@gmail.com wrote:
It is neither efficient or inefficient: it is just a distribution
tool, to deploy python software in a form familiar to most windows
users. It does not
Matlab, from The Mathworks, has a companion product called Simulink.
This allows the user to graphically build ‘algorithms’ in block form.
There is a similar Python function.
Where can I find a Python functionality like simulink ?
thanks,
Stef Mientki
--
Dotan Cohen dotanco...@gmail.com (DC) wrote:
DC Referring to this article:
DC
http://math-blog.com/2009/07/20/complex-algorithm-research-and-development-harder-than-many-think/
DC The author, who is specifically looking for math-related functions, writes:
DC
DC The dream algorithm RD tool
: Monday, July 27, 2009 11:18:20 AM
Subject: Re: Looking for a dream language: sounds like Python to me.
Dotan Cohen dotanco...@gmail.com (DC) wrote:
DC Referring to this article:
DC
http://math-blog.com/2009/07/20/complex-algorithm-research-and-development-harder-than-many-think/
DC The author
[corrected top posting]
Mohammad Tayseer wrote:
*From:* Piet van Oostrum p...@cs.uu.nl
*To:* python-list@python.org
*Sent:* Monday, July 27, 2009 11:18:20 AM
*Subject:* Re: Looking for a dream language: sounds like Python to me.
Dotan Cohen dotanco...@gmail.com mailto:dotanco...@gmail.com
Creating binaries is not the same as creating /fast, efficient/ binaries.
Py2Exe bundles it all together, but does not make it any faster.
How inefficient is py2exe. I was under the impression that it's really
not that bad.
--
Dotan Cohen
http://what-is-what.com
http://gibberish.co.il
--
On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 18:12:09 +0300, Dotan Cohen dotanco...@gmail.com wrote:
Creating binaries is not the same as creating /fast, efficient/ binaries.
Py2Exe bundles it all together, but does not make it any faster.
How inefficient is py2exe. I was under the impression that it's really
not
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 12:12 AM, Dotan Cohendotanco...@gmail.com wrote:
Creating binaries is not the same as creating /fast, efficient/ binaries.
Py2Exe bundles it all together, but does not make it any faster.
How inefficient is py2exe.
It is neither efficient or inefficient: it is just a
On 2009-07-27, Dotan Cohen dotanco...@gmail.com wrote:
Creating binaries is not the same as creating /fast, efficient/ binaries.
??Py2Exe bundles it all together, but does not make it any faster.
How inefficient is py2exe.
[Assuming that was a question.]
py2exe just bundles up the files
It is neither efficient or inefficient: it is just a distribution
tool, to deploy python software in a form familiar to most windows
users. It does not make it any faster than running the software under
a python prompt.
As much as I like python for scientific programming, I would say
python
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 12:28 AM, Dotan Cohendotanco...@gmail.com wrote:
It is neither efficient or inefficient: it is just a distribution
tool, to deploy python software in a form familiar to most windows
users. It does not make it any faster than running the software under
a python prompt.
Referring to this article:
http://math-blog.com/2009/07/20/complex-algorithm-research-and-development-harder-than-many-think/
The author, who is specifically looking for math-related functions, writes:
The dream algorithm RD tool would be similar to Matlab or Mathematica
but could be compiled to
13 matches
Mail list logo
