Thanks Tim and Gerard for recommending karrigell.
I just checked it out. It is indeed a nice package. However, I didn't find
it
easier to learn or use than CherryPy though. I read through CherryPy
tutorials
and have got a good idea how to use it. I also read Karrigell docs. The way
Karrigell
I just did some testing between CherryPy's web server and lighttpd.
My test was very simple and I used ab.exe for this purpose.
CherryPy web server can serve about 140 simple request / second, while
lighttpd can handle around 400 concurrent requests.
You haven't really said much about your
On 07/07/06, Jack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just did some testing between CherryPy's web server and lighttpd.
My test was very simple and I used ab.exe for this purpose.
CherryPy web server can serve about 140 simple request / second, while
lighttpd can handle around 400 concurrent requests.
Tim Williams wrote:
On 07/07/06, Jack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just did some testing between CherryPy's web server and lighttpd.
My test was very simple and I used ab.exe for this purpose.
CherryPy web server can serve about 140 simple request / second, while
lighttpd can handle around
On 7 Jul 2006 06:27:43 -0700, Gerard Flanagan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tim Williams wrote:
On 07/07/06, Jack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just did some testing between CherryPy's web server and lighttpd.
My test was very simple and I used ab.exe for this purpose.
CherryPy web server can
I wrote the last posting at late late night and I didn't know what I was
typing at that time ;-p
I didn't mean the test with CherryPy was not concurrent
connections, or the test with lighttpd was all concurrent
connections. I actually tried both concurrent (-c in ab command line)
and
Jack wrote:
I wrote the last posting at late late night and I didn't know what I was
typing at that time ;-p
I didn't mean the test with CherryPy was not concurrent
connections, or the test with lighttpd was all concurrent
connections. I actually tried both concurrent (-c in ab command line)
I will have to install lighttpd or other web servers.
If it is a Python web server, it would be nice to extend it by putting code
right into the web server. The performance should be better than FastCGI
because it removes the cost to send the requests/replies back and forth.
you'll need to
You are right. Load test can be complicated because of the various patterns
of web applications and usages. The simple tests I mentioned and conducted
just
give myself some idea about the performance. Given the same set up, some
numbers should be comparable and reveal some aspects on web servers'
Just thought I'd mention it. As stated in some posts I put on the list
in the last few days, I'm working on a FastCGI server for python. Of
course its not as fast as lighttpd, but I think it still has many
applications. I've currently got a *very* simple prototype, but I
expect the finished module
I'm using CherryPy 2.2.1.
I just ran benchmark.py multiple times. The fastest it got is 195 req/sec,
with
50 threads. Python was taking 50+% CPU when the test was running.
It would be good to know which version of CherryPy you are using. That
wiki page is talking about the CP 2.0 branch; 2.1
Basically I am trying to find a high performance web server. Since
Python is installed on all of the servers, It'll be great if the web
server is written in Python as well. Otherwise, I will have to install
lighttpd or other web servers.
Then the largest issue with Python-based web servers is
On Thu, 6 Jul 2006 09:36:25 -0700, Jack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Basically I am trying to find a high performance web server. Since
Python is installed on all of the servers, It'll be great if the web
server is written in Python as well. Otherwise, I will have to install
lighttpd or other web
Jack wrote:
I will have to install lighttpd or other web servers.
do that.
If all you need is a webserver there's little reason to have it in
python. Just use one of the several high quality open source webservers.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
To be honest, I'm not sure what kind of performance I can get even
with medusa or twisted. I assume it won't be as fast as servers
written in C/C++ and use async sockets, but should be much better than
multi-processed or multi-threaded servers in written in Python.
Not sure if anyone else has an
I will have to install lighttpd or other web servers.
do that.
If all you need is a webserver there's little reason to have it in
python. Just use one of the several high quality open source webservers.
lighttpd is a great web server. I just didn't want to bother download the
source,
I will have to install lighttpd or other web servers.
do that.
If all you need is a webserver there's little reason to have it in
python. Just use one of the several high quality open source webservers.
If it is a Python web server, it would be nice to extend it by putting code
right into
17 matches
Mail list logo
