Thanks Tim and Gerard for recommending karrigell.
I just checked it out. It is indeed a nice package. However, I didn't find
it
easier to learn or use than CherryPy though. I read through CherryPy
tutorials
and have got a good idea how to use it. I also read Karrigell docs. The way
Karrigell use
I'm using CherryPy 2.2.1.
I just ran benchmark.py multiple times. The fastest it got is 195 req/sec,
with
50 threads. Python was taking 50+% CPU when the test was running.
> It would be good to know which version of CherryPy you are using. That
> wiki page is talking about the CP 2.0 branch; 2.1
Just thought I'd mention it. As stated in some posts I put on the list
in the last few days, I'm working on a FastCGI server for python. Of
course its not as fast as lighttpd, but I think it still has many
applications. I've currently got a *very* simple prototype, but I
expect the finished module
You are right. Load test can be complicated because of the various patterns
of web applications and usages. The simple tests I mentioned and conducted
just
give myself some idea about the performance. Given the same set up, some
numbers should be comparable and reveal some aspects on web servers'
> >> I will have to install lighttpd or other web servers.
> If it is a Python web server, it would be nice to extend it by putting code
> right into the web server. The performance should be better than FastCGI
> because it removes the cost to send the requests/replies back and forth.
you'll nee
Jack wrote:
> I wrote the last posting at late late night and I didn't know what I was
> typing at that time ;-p
>
> I didn't mean the test with CherryPy was not concurrent
> connections, or the test with lighttpd was all concurrent
> connections. I actually tried both concurrent (-c in ab command
I wrote the last posting at late late night and I didn't know what I was
typing at that time ;-p
I didn't mean the test with CherryPy was not concurrent
connections, or the test with lighttpd was all concurrent
connections. I actually tried both concurrent (-c in ab command line)
and non-concurren
On 7 Jul 2006 06:27:43 -0700, Gerard Flanagan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Tim Williams wrote:
> > On 07/07/06, Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I just did some testing between CherryPy's web server and lighttpd.
> > > My test was very simple and I used ab.exe for this purpose.
> > > CherryP
Tim Williams wrote:
> On 07/07/06, Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I just did some testing between CherryPy's web server and lighttpd.
> > My test was very simple and I used ab.exe for this purpose.
> > CherryPy web server can serve about 140 simple request / second, while
> > lighttpd can han
On 07/07/06, Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just did some testing between CherryPy's web server and lighttpd.
> My test was very simple and I used ab.exe for this purpose.
> CherryPy web server can serve about 140 simple request / second, while
> lighttpd can handle around 400 concurrent reque
I just did some testing between CherryPy's web server and lighttpd.
My test was very simple and I used ab.exe for this purpose.
CherryPy web server can serve about 140 simple request / second, while
lighttpd can handle around 400 concurrent requests.
> You haven't really said much about your requi
>> I will have to install lighttpd or other web servers.
>
> do that.
>
> If all you need is a webserver there's little reason to have it in
> python. Just use one of the several high quality open source webservers.
If it is a Python web server, it would be nice to extend it by putting code
right
>> I will have to install lighttpd or other web servers.
>
> do that.
>
> If all you need is a webserver there's little reason to have it in
> python. Just use one of the several high quality open source webservers.
lighttpd is a great web server. I just didn't want to bother download the
source,
To be honest, I'm not sure what kind of performance I can get even
with medusa or twisted. I assume it won't be as fast as servers
written in C/C++ and use async sockets, but should be much better than
multi-processed or multi-threaded servers in written in Python.
Not sure if anyone else has an i
Jack wrote:
> I will have to install lighttpd or other web servers.
do that.
If all you need is a webserver there's little reason to have it in
python. Just use one of the several high quality open source webservers.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Thu, 6 Jul 2006 09:36:25 -0700, Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Basically I am trying to find a high performance web server. Since
>Python is installed on all of the servers, It'll be great if the web
>server is written in Python as well. Otherwise, I will have to install
>lighttpd or other web
Basically I am trying to find a high performance web server. Since
Python is installed on all of the servers, It'll be great if the web
server is written in Python as well. Otherwise, I will have to install
lighttpd or other web servers.
Then the largest issue with Python-based web servers is perf
17 matches
Mail list logo
