[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bengt Richter) writes:
>>I'm not sure exactly what you mean by "grabbing sublass inst d contens
>>directly", but if dict(d.items()) does it, the above class should do
>>it as well. Of course, *other* ways of initializing a dict won't work
>>for this class.
>>
> It's not initializ
On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 09:30:49 -0500, Mike Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bengt Richter) writes:
>> Has anyone found a way besides not deriving from dict?
>> Shouldn't there be a way?
>> TIA
>> (need this for what I hope is an improvement on the Larosa/Foord OrderedDict
>> ;-)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bengt Richter) writes:
> Has anyone found a way besides not deriving from dict?
> Shouldn't there be a way?
> TIA
> (need this for what I hope is an improvement on the Larosa/Foord OrderedDict
> ;-)
>
> I guess I can just document that you have to spell it dict(d.items()), but I
Has anyone found a way besides not deriving from dict?
Shouldn't there be a way?
TIA
(need this for what I hope is an improvement on the Larosa/Foord OrderedDict ;-)
I guess I can just document that you have to spell it dict(d.items()), but I'd
like to hide the internal shenanigans ;-)
Regards,
B
