MRAB wrote:
...
> What are you using for the timestamp? Are you calling a function to
> read a timer?
For timestamp I used a static variable; to update the timestamp for
a dictionary I used
d->timestamp = ++global_dict_timestamp;
I'm using a single counter for all dicts so that when doi
Andrea Griffini wrote:
> Gabriel Genellina wrote:
> > At Saturday 9/12/2006 23:04, Andrea Griffini wrote:
> >
> >> I implemented that crazy idea and seems working... in its
> >> current hacked state can still pass the test suite (exluding
> >
> > What crazy idea? And what is this supposed to do?
>
Gabriel Genellina wrote:
> At Saturday 9/12/2006 23:04, Andrea Griffini wrote:
>
>> I implemented that crazy idea and seems working... in its
>> current hacked state can still pass the test suite (exluding
>
> What crazy idea? And what is this supposed to do?
>
The idea is to avoid looking up co
At Saturday 9/12/2006 23:04, Andrea Griffini wrote:
I implemented that crazy idea and seems working... in its
current hacked state can still pass the test suite (exluding
What crazy idea? And what is this supposed to do?
--
Gabriel Genellina
Softlab SRL
___
Hello,
I implemented that crazy idea and seems working... in its
current hacked state can still pass the test suite (exluding
the tests that don't like self generated output on stdout
from python) and the stats after the quicktest are IMO
impressing:
LOAD_GLOBAL = 13666473
globals miss = 58988
bu
