On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 7:36 PM, Johannes Bauer wrote:
> On 29.08.2016 17:59, Chris Angelico wrote:
>
>> Fair enough. If this were something that a lot of programs wanted,
>> then yeah, there'd be good value in stdlibbing it. Character encodings
>> ARE hard to get right, and
On 29.08.2016 17:59, Chris Angelico wrote:
> Fair enough. If this were something that a lot of programs wanted,
> then yeah, there'd be good value in stdlibbing it. Character encodings
> ARE hard to get right, and this kind of thing does warrant some help.
> But I think it's best not done in core
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 1:28 AM, Random832 wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2016, at 11:14, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> Please don't. :) This is something that belongs in the application;
>> it's somewhat hacky, and I don't see any benefit to it going into the
>> language. For one
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016, at 11:14, Chris Angelico wrote:
> Please don't. :) This is something that belongs in the application;
> it's somewhat hacky, and I don't see any benefit to it going into the
> language. For one thing, I could well imagine making the fallback
> encoding configurable (it isn't
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 12:38 AM, Random832 wrote:
> Directing this to python-list because it's really not on the topic of
> the idea being discussed.
>
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2016, at 05:37, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> Suppose I come to python-ideas and say "Hey, the MUD
Directing this to python-list because it's really not on the topic of
the idea being discussed.
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016, at 05:37, Chris Angelico wrote:
> Suppose I come to python-ideas and say "Hey, the MUD community would
> really benefit from a magic decoder that would use UTF-8 where
> possible,