Re: New Science Discovery: Perl Detractors Remain Idiots After A Decade

2012-03-12 Thread Seymour J.
In m0rrtp@spenarnc.xs4all.nl, on 03/12/2012 at 11:27 AM, Albert van der Horst alb...@spenarnc.xs4all.nl said: You're confused. No, s/h/it is just an acephalic troll with delusions of adequacy. left-associativity and right-associativity are computer languages concept and their definitions

Re: New Science Discovery: Perl Detractors Remain Idiots After A Decade

2012-03-12 Thread Raymond Wiker
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz spamt...@library.lspace.org.invalid writes: In m0rrtp@spenarnc.xs4all.nl, on 03/12/2012 at 11:27 AM, Albert van der Horst alb...@spenarnc.xs4all.nl said: You're confused. No, s/h/it is just an acephalic troll with delusions of adequacy. Another way to

Re: New Science Discovery: Perl Detractors Remain Idiots After A Decade!

2012-03-02 Thread Seymour J.
In OD44r.17949$vo2.12...@newsfe07.iad, on 03/02/2012 at 02:17 PM, Chiron chiron...@gmail.com said: What always gets me is how so many people criticized Sokal for doing it, Google for Omerta. It's common for whistle blowers to be chastised or even persecuted. I agree that the criticism of

Re: New Science Discovery: Perl Detractors Remain Idiots After A Decade!

2012-03-02 Thread Chiron
On Fri, 02 Mar 2012 10:53:30 -0500, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz wrote: In OD44r.17949$vo2.12...@newsfe07.iad, on 03/02/2012 at 02:17 PM, Chiron chiron...@gmail.com said: What always gets me is how so many people criticized Sokal for doing it, Google for Omerta. It's common for whistle