Banibrata Dutta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As such 2.6 & 3.0 are also cooking, but from what I see on the mailing
> list, some of the features are a bit controversial. So if I start with
> 2.5 now, unless there are some break-thru preformance gains, or
> annoying defects fixed, I'd stick to i
2.5 seems the defacto standard now for a new user, NB: probably not
the standard for the common business productions. However are you on
Windows or *nix? *nix may ship a certain version, so for ease of use
it would be best to use that.
Personally I use 2.5 because it is a complete version, and the
On 5/6/08, Bruno Desthuilliers
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nick Craig-Wood a écrit :
> > Banibrata Dutta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > I've gone through the list of "language differences" between 2.3 / 2.4
> > > & 2.5 of CPython. I've spend around 2 weeks now, learning v2.5 of
> > > CPyt
Nick Craig-Wood a écrit :
Banibrata Dutta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've gone through the list of "language differences" between 2.3 / 2.4
& 2.5 of CPython. I've spend around 2 weeks now, learning v2.5 of
CPython, and I consider myself still very very newbie. So, unable to
take a call as to
Banibrata Dutta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've gone through the list of "language differences" between 2.3 / 2.4
> & 2.5 of CPython. I've spend around 2 weeks now, learning v2.5 of
> CPython, and I consider myself still very very newbie. So, unable to
> take a call as to how-important or des
Hi,
I've gone through the list of "language differences" between 2.3 / 2.4
& 2.5 of CPython. I've spend around 2 weeks now, learning v2.5 of
CPython, and I consider myself still very very newbie. So, unable to
take a call as to how-important or desirable the newer language
features are -- so wheth