Re: Numarray newbie question

2005-03-31 Thread Colin J. Williams
ChinStrap wrote: I know there are probably alternatives for this with the standard library, but I think that would kill the speed I get with numarray: Say I have two 2-dimensional numarrays (x_mat and y_mat, say), and a function f(x,y) that I would like to evaluate at every index. Basically I want

Re: Numarray newbie question

2005-03-29 Thread ChinStrap
Are there no windows binaries for SciPy for python 2.4 yet? I try to run the installer and it complains that it can't find python 2.3. Besides that, vectorize is exactly what i want. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: Numarray newbie question

2005-03-29 Thread Robert Kern
ChinStrap wrote: Are there no windows binaries for SciPy for python 2.4 yet? I try to run the installer and it complains that it can't find python 2.3. No, not yet. Besides that, vectorize is exactly what i want. -- Robert Kern [EMAIL PROTECTED] In the fields of hell where the grass grows high

Re: Numarray newbie question

2005-03-29 Thread ChinStrap
Oh well. I am downloading all the things to build it, but in the mean time I just did: def get_y_mat(x_ind,y_ind): return self.y_min + y_ind*self.dy def get_x_mat(x_ind,y_ind): return self.x_min + x_ind*self.dx

Numarray newbie question

2005-03-28 Thread ChinStrap
I know there are probably alternatives for this with the standard library, but I think that would kill the speed I get with numarray: Say I have two 2-dimensional numarrays (x_mat and y_mat, say), and a function f(x,y) that I would like to evaluate at every index. Basically I want to be able to

Re: Numarray newbie question

2005-03-28 Thread Robert Kern
ChinStrap wrote: I know there are probably alternatives for this with the standard library, but I think that would kill the speed I get with numarray: Say I have two 2-dimensional numarrays (x_mat and y_mat, say), and a function f(x,y) that I would like to evaluate at every index. Basically I want