Supported provider list (with example code) is now:
* Facebook
* Google
* Foursquare
* bitly
* GitHub
* StackExchange
* Instagram
Other providers may also be supported out of the box, but have been untested
thus far.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 1:38 AM, Demian Brecht demianbre...@gmail.com wrote:
Supported provider list (with example code) is now:
* Facebook
* Google
* Foursquare
* bitly
* GitHub
* StackExchange
* Instagram
Other providers may also be supported out of the box, but have been untested
...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 06, 2012 11:42 AM
To: Demian Brecht
Cc: comp.lang.pyt...@googlegroups.com; python-list@python.org
Subject: Re: OAuth 2.0 implementation
On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 1:38 AM, Demian Brecht demianbre...@gmail.com
wrote:
Supported provider list (with example code) is now
: Friday, July 06, 2012 11:42 AM
To: Demian Brecht
Cc: comp.lang.pyt...@googlegroups.com; python-list@python.org
Subject: Re: OAuth 2.0 implementation
On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 1:38 AM, Demian Brecht demianbre...@gmail.com
wrote:
Supported provider list (with example code) is now:
* Facebook
FWIW, this package has undergone a major overhaul (474 LOC down to much happier
66) and is available at https://github.com/demianbrecht/sanction. Also
available from PyPI.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 12:06 AM, Demian Brecht demianbre...@gmail.com wrote:
FWIW, this package has undergone a major overhaul (474 LOC down to much
happier 66) and is available at https://github.com/demianbrecht/sanction.
Also available from PyPI.
Thanks for this, I've now shared it on my
On Thursday, 5 July 2012 08:19:41 UTC-7, Alec Taylor wrote:
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 12:06 AM, Demian Brecht demianbre...@gmail.com wrote:
FWIW, this package has undergone a major overhaul (474 LOC down to much
happier 66) and is available at https://github.com/demianbrecht/sanction.
Also
On 28/03/2012 1:18 AM, Roy Smith wrote:
In article
7909491.0.1332826232743.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@pbim5,
Demian Brecht demianbre...@gmail.com wrote:
OAuth 2.0 is still in draft status (draft 25 is the current one I believe)
and yes, unfortunately every single server available at this
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Ben Finney ben+pyt...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
Demian Brecht demianbre...@gmail.com writes:
I'm getting close to an alpha release of an OAuth 2.0 implementation
(https://github.com/demianbrecht/py-sanction).
Thank you for doing this work.
As someone who uses
:11 AM, Ben Finney ben+pyt...@benfinney.id.au
wrote:
Demian Brecht demianbre...@gmail.com writes:
I'm getting close to an alpha release of an OAuth 2.0 implementation
(https://github.com/demianbrecht/py-sanction).
Thank you for doing this work.
As someone who uses OpenID, what can I
In article
7909491.0.1332826232743.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@pbim5,
Demian Brecht demianbre...@gmail.com wrote:
OAuth 2.0 is still in draft status (draft 25 is the current one I believe)
and yes, unfortunately every single server available at this point have
varying degrees of
On Tuesday, 27 March 2012 07:18:26 UTC-7, Roy Smith wrote:
In article
7909491.0.1332826232743.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@pbim5,
Demian Brecht demianbre...@gmail.com wrote:
OAuth 2.0 is still in draft status (draft 25 is the current one I believe)
and yes, unfortunately every
Hi all,
I'm getting close to an alpha release of an OAuth 2.0 implementation
(https://github.com/demianbrecht/py-sanction). High level features include:
* Support for multiple providers (protocol deviations). This didn't seem to be
supported by any library.
* Actually an OAuth 2.0
Demian Brecht demianbre...@gmail.com writes:
I'm getting close to an alpha release of an OAuth 2.0 implementation
(https://github.com/demianbrecht/py-sanction).
Thank you for doing this work.
As someone who uses OpenID, what can I read about why OAuth is better?
Everything I read is targeted
In article 87haxahh51@benfinney.id.au,
Ben Finney ben+pyt...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
Demian Brecht demianbre...@gmail.com writes:
I'm getting close to an alpha release of an OAuth 2.0 implementation
(https://github.com/demianbrecht/py-sanction).
Thank you for doing this work
Roy Smith r...@panix.com writes:
In article 87haxahh51@benfinney.id.au,
Ben Finney ben+pyt...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
As someone who uses OpenID, what can I read about why OAuth is better?
OpenID is for people who worry about things like how OpenID is different
from OAuth. Oauth is
In article 878vimhfdp@benfinney.id.au,
Ben Finney ben+pyt...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
Roy Smith r...@panix.com writes:
In article 87haxahh51@benfinney.id.au,
Ben Finney ben+pyt...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
As someone who uses OpenID, what can I read about why OAuth is better?
Roy Smith r...@panix.com writes:
In article 878vimhfdp@benfinney.id.au,
Ben Finney ben+pyt...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
So, if I want to be free to choose an identity provider I trust, and
it's not Facebook or Google or Twitter or other privacy-hostile
services, how does OAuth help me
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 12:24 AM, Ben Finney ben+pyt...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
Roy Smith r...@panix.com writes:
In article 878vimhfdp@benfinney.id.au,
Ben Finney ben+pyt...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
So, if I want to be free to choose an identity provider I trust, and
it's not Facebook or
On Monday, 26 March 2012 21:24:35 UTC-7, Ben Finney wrote:
Roy Smith r...@panix.com writes:
In article 878vimhfdp@benfinney.id.au,
Ben Finney ben+pyt...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
So, if I want to be free to choose an identity provider I trust, and
it's not Facebook or Google or
20 matches
Mail list logo
