On Jun 18, 5:25 am, Gabriel Genellina gagsl-...@yahoo.com.ar
wrote:
En Thu, 17 Jun 2010 07:12:23 -0300, Fuzzyman fuzzy...@gmail.com escribi�:
On Jun 17, 10:29 am, Gabriel Genellina gagsl-...@yahoo.com.ar
wrote:
En Thu, 17 Jun 2010 04:52:48 -0300, Alf P. Steinbach al...@start.no
En Wed, 16 Jun 2010 19:56:39 -0300, Ian Kelly ian.g.ke...@gmail.com
escribió:
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 3:38 PM, John Nagle na...@animats.com wrote:
That just leaves things in a state where even sys and import
are undefined.
Say what? It works fine for me.
import proxy_mod
proxy_mod.f()
* Gabriel Genellina, on 17.06.2010 09:25:
En Wed, 16 Jun 2010 19:56:39 -0300, Ian Kelly ian.g.ke...@gmail.com
escribió:
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 3:38 PM, John Nagle na...@animats.com wrote:
That just leaves things in a state where even sys and import
are undefined.
Say what? It works fine
En Thu, 17 Jun 2010 04:52:48 -0300, Alf P. Steinbach al...@start.no
escribió:
* Gabriel Genellina, on 17.06.2010 09:25:
En Wed, 16 Jun 2010 19:56:39 -0300, Ian Kelly ian.g.ke...@gmail.com
escribió:
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 3:38 PM, John Nagle na...@animats.com wrote:
That just leaves
On Jun 17, 10:29 am, Gabriel Genellina gagsl-...@yahoo.com.ar
wrote:
En Thu, 17 Jun 2010 04:52:48 -0300, Alf P. Steinbach al...@start.no
escribió:
But who would have thunk that Python *isn't dynamic enough*? :-)
Yep... There are other examples too (e.g. the print statement in 2.x
On 6/17/2010 12:25 AM, Gabriel Genellina wrote:
Note the fake.g(8) call: __setattr__ wasn't called.
If the OP wants to trace assignments to global variables, this becomes a
problem.
A function defined in a module holds a reference to the module's
__dict__ in its func_globals attribute. Getting
En Thu, 17 Jun 2010 07:12:23 -0300, Fuzzyman fuzzy...@gmail.com escribió:
On Jun 17, 10:29 am, Gabriel Genellina gagsl-...@yahoo.com.ar
wrote:
En Thu, 17 Jun 2010 04:52:48 -0300, Alf P. Steinbach al...@start.no
escribió:
But who would have thunk that Python *isn't dynamic enough*? :-)
En Thu, 17 Jun 2010 14:09:38 -0300, John Nagle na...@animats.com
escribió:
I'm trying out a proof of concept implementation for a new
approach to safe threading. It's somewhat similar in concept
to Alan Olsen's scheme. The basic difference is that once
the program goes multi-thread, code
On Jun 16, 7:25 am, John Nagle na...@animats.com wrote:
OK, working on this. I can make a module make itself into a
fake class, but can't yet do it to other modules from outside.
John Nagle
I think you can with something like
import module
There aren't any; modules do not follow the class object protocol. They
are simple types with a __dict__ (which you can't change, either, so no
replacing it with a dict that implements __setattr__).
You are wrong, my friend. :)
Modules follow the new style class and instance protocol. Modules
On 06/16/10 12:43, John Nagle wrote:
Is it possible to override __setattr__ of a module? I
want to capture changes to global variables for debug purposes.
None of the following seem to have any effect.
modu.__setattr__ = myfn
setattr(modu, __setattr__, myfn)
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 20:34:47 -0700, Michele Simionato wrote:
On Jun 16, 4:43 am, John Nagle na...@animats.com wrote:
Is it possible to override __setattr__ of a module? I
want to capture changes to global variables for debug purposes.
[...]
There is a dirty trick which involves fiddling
On 6/16/10 1:23 AM, Christian Heimes wrote:
There aren't any; modules do not follow the class object protocol. They
are simple types with a __dict__ (which you can't change, either, so no
replacing it with a dict that implements __setattr__).
You are wrong, my friend. :)
Modules follow
On 6/15/2010 8:34 PM, Michele Simionato wrote:
On Jun 16, 4:43 am, John Naglena...@animats.com wrote:
Is it possible to override __setattr__ of a module? I
want to capture changes to global variables for debug purposes.
None of the following seem to have any effect.
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 12:55 PM, John Nagle na...@animats.com wrote:
Note that there are now two copies of a, one bound to the module and
referenced in f, and a second bound to the class, and referenced by
x.a. Uh oh.
The problem here is that when def f... was defined, its reference
to a
On 6/16/2010 1:10 PM, Ian Kelly wrote:
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 12:55 PM, John Naglena...@animats.com wrote:
Note that there are now two copies of a, one bound to the module and
referenced in f, and a second bound to the class, and referenced by
x.a. Uh oh.
The problem here is that when def
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 3:38 PM, John Nagle na...@animats.com wrote:
That just leaves things in a state where even sys and import
are undefined.
Say what? It works fine for me.
import proxy_mod
proxy_mod.f()
1
proxy_mod.a = 2
setting a=2
proxy_mod.f()
2
proxy_mod.sys
module 'sys'
Is it possible to override __setattr__ of a module? I
want to capture changes to global variables for debug purposes.
None of the following seem to have any effect.
modu.__setattr__ = myfn
setattr(modu, __setattr__, myfn)
delattr(modu, __setattr__)
On Jun 16, 4:43 am, John Nagle na...@animats.com wrote:
Is it possible to override __setattr__ of a module? I
want to capture changes to global variables for debug purposes.
None of the following seem to have any effect.
modu.__setattr__ = myfn
setattr(modu,
On 6/15/2010 8:34 PM, Michele Simionato wrote:
On Jun 16, 4:43 am, John Naglena...@animats.com wrote:
Is it possible to override __setattr__ of a module? I
want to capture changes to global variables for debug purposes.
None of the following seem to have any effect.
On 6/15/10 9:16 PM, John Nagle wrote:
Cute, but it doesn't work in general. Faking a module as a
class fails when you simply call
x()
within the module.
Huh? Explain how it doesn't work? I've done it at least twice
(shamefully do I admit this) and it works fine. Real life code.
On 6/15/2010 9:33 PM, Stephen Hansen wrote:
On 6/15/10 9:16 PM, John Nagle wrote:
Cute, but it doesn't work in general. Faking a module as a
class fails when you simply call
x()
within the module.
Huh? Explain how it doesn't work? I've done it at least twice
(shamefully do I admit
On 6/15/10 10:25 PM, John Nagle wrote:
On 6/15/2010 9:33 PM, Stephen Hansen wrote:
Replacing the module with a class in sys.modules is really the only way
to fake the behavior.
OK, working on this. I can make a module make itself into a
fake class, but can't yet do it to other
23 matches
Mail list logo
